Oh bullshit! The citizens of Fulton County didn't decide to indict Donald Trump...that was a decision made by an ambitious District Attorney who thought she could become a political force if she was the one who took down Trump. (Gee, Fani...how's that working out for you! lol)You keep your hopes up.
Excuses excuses. You think it's easy to bring a rico case against a former President and 14 other co-defendants? It just happens just like that? Also in case you're ignorant the citizens of Fulton County decided to indict Trump. Democracy is important but so is justice and your right to vote isn't hindered by Trump facing criminal justice. You can still vote, even if Trump is convicted.
Charging candidates with bullshit charges to effect the outcome of an election is very subversive.
You stupid moron, the decision went to two seperate grand juries. Do you know who sits on juries, Dumb Dumb?
Joe your ignorance of how virus's work is epic! If you'll remember, Trump wanted to shut down travel from China at the onset of Covid. Do you remember how you on the left attacked him for being a racist over that? If you remember Nancy Pelosi told people that it was perfectly safe to go out in public at the start of the pandemic. So did Chuck Schumer. What policy of Trump's even APPROACHES the level of "dumbass" that Andrew Cuomo putting Covid infected patients back in nursing homes?
Obviously it isn't easy if you're a corrupt DA. Willis really fucked the dog on this one...lolYou keep your hopes up.
Excuses excuses. You think it's easy to bring a rico case against a former President and 14 other co-defendants? It just happens just like that? Also in case you're ignorant the citizens of Fulton County decided to indict Trump. Democracy is important but so is justice and your right to vote isn't hindered by Trump facing criminal justice. You can still vote, even if Trump is convicted.
You can indict a ham sammich.
You mean "if" the trial starts?
Then why can't you dipshits get one for Biden? Are you dumber than a ham sandwich? There there.
Jurists that are told that they can trust that the evidence presented to them is being presented by a District Attorney that is above reproach? One that would NEVER lie?
Because Biden is too fucked in the head to stand trial and because there's a DOJ rule prohibiting indicting a sitting president.Then why can't you dipshits get one for Biden? Are you dumber than a ham sandwich? There there.
"The evil will become ensnared in their own deceit". Proverbs: 12:13
You can't indict a sitting President. You can impeach them.Then why can't you dipshits get one for Biden? Are you dumber than a ham sandwich? There there.
Jurists are presented evidence if you have evidence that there was something wrong with Fani's evidence then present that.
I agree. It would be.
You get dumber by the post, Curried! Grand Jury hearings are secret. The only people that know what goes on behind those locked doors are the jury members and the prosecution. It's one of the reasons that DA's are held to a high standard. They wield immense power to indict people...power that can be abused. That's the reason why Willis and Wade should never wield that kind of power again...they have no problem lying.
It is in this case. Good thing this case is pretty much gone tits up
Unfortunately that is a fundamental weakness in any scenario.
I respectfully disagree but if your scenario actually takes place, I will accept it.
