Big Fail for J6 Unarmed "Insurrection" Gaslighters: 65% of All Voters Believe Undercover Agents Provoked the J6 Capitol Riot - Rasmussen

[munkle]

No one is believing your gaslighting BS LOL. 99% peaceful protest. Violence did not start until cops starting throwing flash-bangs into crowd just sipping on their Starbucks.



Starting with Ray Epps..

 

[Sixties Fan]

No one is believing your gaslighting BS LOL. 99% peaceful protest. Violence did not start until cops starting throwing flash-bangs into crowd just sipping on their Starbucks.



Starting with Ray Epps..

[ Only fake news lovers believe in Rasmussen ]


Nor did it make much difference whether the polls were branded as Rasmussen Reports surveys, or instead, were commissioned for Fox News by its subsidiary Pulse Opinion Research. (Both sets of surveys used an essentially identical methodology.) Polls branded as Rasmussen Reports missed by an average of 5.9 points and had a 3.9 point bias. The polls it commissioned on behalf of Fox News had a 5.1 point error, and a 3.6 point bias.

Rasmussen’s polls have come under heavy criticism throughout this election cycle, including from FiveThirtyEight. We have critiqued the firm for its cavalier attitude toward polling convention. Rasmussen, for instance, generally conducts all of its interviews during a single, 4-hour window; speaks with the first person it reaches on the phone rather than using a random selection process; does not call cellphones; does not call back respondents whom it misses initially; and uses a computer script rather than live interviewers to conduct its surveys. These are cost-saving measures which contribute to very low response rates and may lead to biased samples.

Rasmussen also weights their surveys based on preordained assumptions about the party identification of voters in each state, a relatively unusual practice that many polling firms consider dubious since party identification (unlike characteristics like age and gender) is often quite fluid.

Rasmussen’s polls — after a poor debut in 2000 in which they picked the wrong winner in 7 key states in that year’s Presidential race — nevertheless had performed quite strongly in in 2004 and 2006. And they were about average in 2008. But their polls were poor this year.

Rasmussen Polls Were Biased and Inaccurate; Quinnipiac, SurveyUSA Performed Strongly

A look at the accuracy of polling firms finds that Rasmussen Reports – whose polls were used regularly by Fox – often showed bias toward Republican candidates.

archive.nytimes.com

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

[ Only fake news lovers believe in Rasmussen ]


Nor did it make much difference whether the polls were branded as Rasmussen Reports surveys, or instead, were commissioned for Fox News by its subsidiary Pulse Opinion Research. (Both sets of surveys used an essentially identical methodology.) Polls branded as Rasmussen Reports missed by an average of 5.9 points and had a 3.9 point bias. The polls it commissioned on behalf of Fox News had a 5.1 point error, and a 3.6 point bias.

Rasmussen’s polls have come under heavy criticism throughout this election cycle, including from FiveThirtyEight. We have critiqued the firm for its cavalier attitude toward polling convention. Rasmussen, for instance, generally conducts all of its interviews during a single, 4-hour window; speaks with the first person it reaches on the phone rather than using a random selection process; does not call cellphones; does not call back respondents whom it misses initially; and uses a computer script rather than live interviewers to conduct its surveys. These are cost-saving measures which contribute to very low response rates and may lead to biased samples.

Rasmussen also weights their surveys based on preordained assumptions about the party identification of voters in each state, a relatively unusual practice that many polling firms consider dubious since party identification (unlike characteristics like age and gender) is often quite fluid.

Rasmussen’s polls — after a poor debut in 2000 in which they picked the wrong winner in 7 key states in that year’s Presidential race — nevertheless had performed quite strongly in in 2004 and 2006. And they were about average in 2008. But their polls were poor this year.

Rasmussen Polls Were Biased and Inaccurate; Quinnipiac, SurveyUSA Performed Strongly

A look at the accuracy of polling firms finds that Rasmussen Reports – whose polls were used regularly by Fox – often showed bias toward Republican candidates.

archive.nytimes.com

.




Thanks for your thought provoking post.

.

 

[otto105]

No one is believing your gaslighting BS LOL. 99% peaceful protest. Violence did not start until cops starting throwing flash-bangs into crowd just sipping on their Starbucks.



Starting with Ray Epps..

Fucking hilarious fuckup




Geezsus you fuckups can’t accept your actions and be accountable like you say that you do.



Awesome

 

[munkle]

Fucking hilarious fuckup




Geezsus you fuckups can’t accept your actions and be accountable like you say that you do.



Awesome

Ray Epps?

 

[busybee01]

No one is believing your gaslighting BS LOL. 99% peaceful protest. Violence did not start until cops starting throwing flash-bangs into crowd just sipping on their Starbucks.



Starting with Ray Epps..

Rasmussen is fake news and fake polling.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Rasmussen is fake news and fake polling.

.


All news and polling are fake news and fake polling.



.

 

[otto105]

Ray Epps?

Ray Epps led the Insurrection?



Hilarious




Own it national socialist.