dilloduck
Diamond Member
hell, they are more likely to vote for Obama.
only until the wind starts blowing in another direction. Since many in the money cartels aren't even Americans they can't vote. ( They just buy "stock" in Obama. )
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hell, they are more likely to vote for Obama.
Remember Reagan broke the air traffic controllers union? And before Reagan, we had 2 million illegals and now we have 12. Yes, Reagan started this. Reagan and his montra of less government. Reagan said the government wasn't the solution, it was the problem. Well if you don't believe in government, then you shouldn't govern.
Yea, we know you don't think Obama will fix anything. That's why you voted the way you did. Of course you are a skeptic. We all know that. Just watch.
Now please explain what you mean by this, "higher punitive and confiscatory taxes in the name of fairness.".
Of course the government spends too much. We spend more than the rest of the world on defense COMBINED!
But what I think you mean are social services. You want to gut the government of all the good it does because you don't approve of giving to poor inner cities, for example. But you defend the excessive defense spending, correct?
Since I know that our government is going to spend one way or the other, then I say I want my taxes to go to poor people and to fix America's infrastructure. Where as you want to feed the military industrial machine.
So I think you are making an argument against raising the top 1%'s taxes. Sure, if the government can find a way to stop spending a lot of money, then fine, cut the rich people's taxes. But until that day comes, America works best when you take the burden off of the middle class. That includes slapping what we spend onto the debt.
And the rich will get along fine even if we take away their unfair tax breaks. We'll give them incentives/tax breaks when they hire people. Not just give them the break and keep our fingers crossed.
Because isn't that what the bankers are doing? We gave them $350 billion and they aren't doing what they said they would do with the money.
So don't talk free markets when the banks need $750 billion of our tax dollars. That's not free.
Who have no party affiliation I might add !!!
only until the wind starts blowing in another direction. Since many in the money cartels aren't even Americans they can't vote. ( They just buy "stock" in Obama. )
The corporations that are sending jobs overseas are GOP.
The people who like illegals coming here and lowering wages are typically GOP.
The Defense companies like Haloburton and Blackwater that raped the treasury are gop.
Allowing corporations to pollute so they can save a buck is a GOP thing.
The corporations that are sending jobs overseas are GOP.
The people who like illegals coming here and lowering wages are typically GOP.
The Defense companies like Haloburton and Blackwater that raped the treasury are gop.
Tom Delay got into politics because of regulations that were imposed on his company.
He spent three years working for Redwood Chemical. This work was the source for his nickname "the Exterminator". In the 11 years DeLay ran the company, the IRS imposed tax liens on him three times for not paying payroll and income taxes.[2] The United States Environmental Protection Agency's ban on a certain pesticide that was used in extermination work led DeLay to oppose government regulation of businesses, a belief that he has carried with him throughout his political career.[3]
Allowing corporations to pollute so they can save a buck is a GOP thing.
Hardy har har. This is a greed thing, and the only color that matters in that world is green.
Money Cartels----not corporations----think bigger, dude !!
Hardy har har. This is a greed thing, and the only color that matters in that world is green.
And for awhile I thought oil was fucking the Big 3 but now I think the big three want out of Michigan and out of the unions too, so they are purposely bankrupting themselves.
Now if they can get $25 billion and prolong failure for a few more years, they'll go that route too. That's why I'm glad we're asking them for a business plan. I don't want to reward the Big 3 CEO's, but I do want to save auto manufacturing.
But the oil and car companies were in collusion with each other on CAFE standards. We could get 65 miles per gallon but then people would buy less gas and then they wouldn't buy the gas guzzling SUV's.
But even if the Big 3 succeed, they've already lowered wages. New people do not have the same benefits that the old timers do. And the Big 3 have cut pensions for retired salary and they keep charging retiree's more and more for their healthcare, etc.
And you are right, it's probably much bigger than I know/think. I do not suggest I know what the hell is going on. I can only tell you what it looks like to me, from where I sit.
But the days of asking us to make less when the CEO makes $20 million a year has got to be over. Unfortunately, it is not.
The only way to increase wages is for supply and demand/the economy to get better. Step one is get rid of the illegals.
I have a neighbor who lays brick. 3 whites, the rest mexicans. No insurance, $14 hr., no benefits. If the union gets sent home because of rain, they get paid. If my buddy gets sent home, he does not get paid. Get rid of the illegals doing that work! We used to do that work before they were allowed in!! And if companies can't find enough good help, they'll pay more. Yes it will cost the consumer more, but that's the breaks here in the good old USA!!! We don't have a slave labor class here, nor should we.
His company is an outsourced labor company that the union company subcontracts. The company itself charges the same as a union employee would make, only no healthcare. So my buddy makes $14, the company he works for gets $8 hr. for his work, and the main company doesn't pay healthcare to the outsourced company. In the end, the employees suffer. Unacceptable.
1.
5. You arrogant bastard. All of us are where we are because we want to be here? You arrogant fuck! Clearly you make $100k and so you can be such an arrogant fucker.
Bankers--financial policy makers--lending institutions--- Federal reserves---cmon think big and think global.
You are defending the people/corporations/politicians who are working hard to lower your worth. Corporate profits are not more important than the American middle class. It's what makes America great. Do you think profits are more important than your standard of living? What do you do?
5. You arrogant bastard. All of us are where we are because we want to be here? You arrogant fuck! Clearly you make $100k and so you can be such an arrogant fucker.
The notion that you are (or aren't) responsible for you position in life is not that radical and not a right or left issue. It's a human nature issue. People tend to give themselves credit for their successes and blame others for their failures.
I really encourage to take step back and think about this in a different manner. This have and have not thing is not rich vs. poor thing or a right vs. left thing. It is predominantly a result of human behavior and a change in our cultural atitude.
What's the matter boo boo did I hit a nerve?
You don't want to take the credit for where you are in your life?
It's someone else's, some "rich" person's fault not yours right?
And yes I do make over 100K but I will bet I risked more than you and worked longer and harder than you to get it. But you think that if I want to keep what I earn because I risked every dime I had to open a business I am somehow arrogant?
How about you? You lazy fuck wanting to take money other people earned so you can feel better about yourself and your government because you didn't have the stones to risk it all on your own?
So yes asshole you are exactly where YOU want to be and it's no ones fault but your own if you don't like it.
Sorry to pick on this one as well but it's one of those nerve touching issues. I DON'T make 100k a year or anywhere even close to that. The notion that you are (or aren't) responsible for you position in life is not that radical and not a right or left issue. It's a human nature issue. People tend to give themselves credit for their successes and blame others for their failures.
I really encourage to take step back and think about this in a different manner. This have and have not thing is not rich vs. poor thing or a right vs. left thing. It is predominantly a result of human behavior and a change in our cultural atitude.
We don't all start out in the same place, dude. I started out in a 3,000 sq ft. home on a farm, in an area with no crime, with two parents who taught me to work hard and save my money, and a dad who did very well working very hard in a small business that he started and ran for more than 30 years.
I was given the opportunity to attend good schools all my life, to eat good food, to have a stable home life, to have good medical care, and to go to college.
My hand of cards was stacked.
And, I've spent the last almost 20 years working with poor inner city kids who grow up with a dad in prison, mom addicted to crack, in shitty schools, in filthy homes where meals are hit/miss and gnereally unhealthy, living in a crime-infested neighborhood where it is dangerous to go outside after dark. Kids who've never been to the dentist in their life, who will never be given a hand in paying for college tuition. In the card game of life, these kids got nothing in their hand.
I agree, a lot of success in life is due to hard work, personal motivation, being thrifty, all of that.
But, we don't all start out with the same hand in the card game of life. To pretend otherwise is simply self-deception.
If the playing field in the U.S. were flat and equitable, then we could all make these claims. And yeah, I've seen plenty of people throw away their lives through making bad choices. But don't ever kid yourself and think that life is fair, because it sure as hell isn't.
We don't all start out in the same place, dude. I started out in a 3,000 sq ft. home on a farm, in an area with no crime, with two parents who taught me to work hard and save my money, and a dad who did very well working very hard in a small business that he started and ran for more than 30 years.
I was given the opportunity to attend good schools all my life, to eat good food, to have a stable home life, to have good medical care, and to go to college.
My hand of cards was stacked.
And, I've spent the last almost 20 years working with poor inner city kids who grow up with a dad in prison, mom addicted to crack, in shitty schools, in filthy homes where meals are hit/miss and gnereally unhealthy, living in a crime-infested neighborhood where it is dangerous to go outside after dark. Kids who've never been to the dentist in their life, who will never be given a hand in paying for college tuition. In the card game of life, these kids got nothing in their hand.
I agree, a lot of success in life is due to hard work, personal motivation, being thrifty, all of that.
But, we don't all start out with the same hand in the card game of life. To pretend otherwise is simply self-deception.
If the playing field in the U.S. were flat and equitable, then we could all make these claims. And yeah, I've seen plenty of people throw away their lives through making bad choices. But don't ever kid yourself and think that life is fair, because it sure as hell isn't.