Thinker101
Diamond Member
- Mar 25, 2017
- 26,283
- 17,575
- 1,415
Sure...and who would be paying those real taxes?
Biden to announce executive actions on guns
- Thread starter Quasar44
- Start date
Sure...and who would be paying those real taxes?
Rigby5
Diamond Member
No president has the authority to ban things.
Only congress has that authority.
All a president is supposed to do is enforce what Congress enacts.
pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 82,944
- 33,709
- 2,250
Tax Capital Gains at the same rate as regular income.
NoBueno
VIP Member
Do you know the difference between a clip and a magazine?
InspectorDetector
Platinum Member
- Mar 3, 2021
- 911
- 1,061
- 898
Indeed. No President makes "laws". That's what the worthless Congress is supposed to do. Now, let's say that tomorrow the House passes a "gun confiscation" law. That moron Pelosi sends it to the Senate and say (what the hell) and THEY pass it. It goes to dementia Joe's desk and HE signs it. Then it (temporarily) becomes "law".
The next day it goes to the SCOTUS where they deem the law unconstitutional. So much for that.
That's what checks and balances are for......
Quasar44
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #30
There is no USSC , anymore
Indeed. No President makes "laws". That's what the worthless Congress is supposed to do. Now, let's say that tomorrow the House passes a "gun confiscation" law. That moron Pelosi sends it to the Senate and say (what the hell) and THEY pass it. It goes to dementia Joe's desk and HE signs it. Then it (temporarily) becomes "law".
The next day it goes to the SCOTUS where they deem the law unconstitutional. So much for that.
That's what checks and balances are for......
LOL....assault looking weapons....LOL....
White House confirms Biden will sign executive order on gun control | Blaze Media
President Joe Biden will sign executive order on gun control, according to White House press secretary. Biden admnistraiton may take action against 3D-printed ghost guns and imported firearms.www.theblaze.com
This is the only thing I agree with xiden on and raising the taxes on corporations
We agree on only 2 issues
He is going to ban 3D printed guns and ghost kits
What he needs to do is ban any large mags over 7 rounds and all Assault looking weapons
They also should have federal laws that only restrict guns to your home
Big Scary Bang Bangs.
InspectorDetector
Platinum Member
- Mar 3, 2021
- 911
- 1,061
- 898
Of course. A "clip" is a set of rounds that are bound to a "clip" and placed into the weapon (a M1 Garand is a great example) for firing. When the rounds have been used - the clip is ejected and a new clip pushed in.
A "magazine" holds the number of rounds (7-10-15 whatever) and the shells are fed into the weapon by the Bolt and the extractor. When they have been used, you must eject the magazine and insert a new magazine.
Just that simple. I know, I cringe every time I hear someone say a AR15 "Clip".....hurts the ears.................
Canon Shooter
Diamond Member
- Jan 7, 2020
- 17,673
- 14,526
- 2,288
This is why idiots on the left should never be in charge of anything having to do with the 2nd Amendment.
Right here you admit to wanting to ban a gun not for the damage that it can inflict but, rather, on how scary it looks.
What you're saying is that you would not insist on banning this rifle, which is commonly referred to as a "ranch gun":
But you would absolutely want to ban this gun, the AR-15, based solely its looks:
What dipshits like you fail to realize is that, operationally, they are the exact same weapon. They each fire a .223 round with the same muzzle velocity. They inflict the same level of damage. And, before you whine about the magazine on the AR-15, understand that high capacity magazines are readily available for the ranch gun.
Wanting to ban something because of how it looks is beyond stupid...
InspectorDetector
Platinum Member
- Mar 3, 2021
- 911
- 1,061
- 898
There is no USSC , anymore
Indeed. No President makes "laws". That's what the worthless Congress is supposed to do. Now, let's say that tomorrow the House passes a "gun confiscation" law. That moron Pelosi sends it to the Senate and say (what the hell) and THEY pass it. It goes to dementia Joe's desk and HE signs it. Then it (temporarily) becomes "law".
The next day it goes to the SCOTUS where they deem the law unconstitutional. So much for that.
That's what checks and balances are for......
Well, there are a bunch of old farts that occupy the seats.......
InspectorDetector
Platinum Member
- Mar 3, 2021
- 911
- 1,061
- 898
This is why idiots on the left should never be in charge of anything having to do with the 2nd Amendment.
Right here you admit to wanting to ban a gun not for the damage that it can inflict but, rather, on how scary it looks.
What you're saying is that you would not insist on banning this rifle, which is commonly referred to as a "ranch gun":
But you would absolutely want to ban this gun, the AR-15, based solely its looks:
What dipshits like you fail to realize is that, operationally, they are the exact same weapon. They each fire a .223 round with the same muzzle velocity. They inflict the same level of damage. And, before you whine about the magazine on the AR-15, understand that high capacity magazines are readily available for the ranch gun.
Wanting to ban something because of how it looks is beyond stupid...
HAHA........ I can do more damage with my 7mm bolt action Mauser at long range than I ever could with the "monstrous" AR-15.........and yeah, those idiots would ban the AR-15 while leaving the ranch rifle alone - even though they are basically the exact same gun...
Yeah....but the black one looks scarier.
This is why idiots on the left should never be in charge of anything having to do with the 2nd Amendment.
Right here you admit to wanting to ban a gun not for the damage that it can inflict but, rather, on how scary it looks.
What you're saying is that you would not insist on banning this rifle, which is commonly referred to as a "ranch gun":
But you would absolutely want to ban this gun, the AR-15, based solely its looks:
What dipshits like you fail to realize is that, operationally, they are the exact same weapon. They each fire a .223 round with the same muzzle velocity. They inflict the same level of damage. And, before you whine about the magazine on the AR-15, understand that high capacity magazines are readily available for the ranch gun.
Wanting to ban something because of how it looks is beyond stupid...
- Jan 27, 2017
- 22,217
- 28,252
- 2,415
Yeah....but the black one looks scarier.
This is why idiots on the left should never be in charge of anything having to do with the 2nd Amendment.
Right here you admit to wanting to ban a gun not for the damage that it can inflict but, rather, on how scary it looks.
What you're saying is that you would not insist on banning this rifle, which is commonly referred to as a "ranch gun":
But you would absolutely want to ban this gun, the AR-15, based solely its looks:
What dipshits like you fail to realize is that, operationally, they are the exact same weapon. They each fire a .223 round with the same muzzle velocity. They inflict the same level of damage. And, before you whine about the magazine on the AR-15, understand that high capacity magazines are readily available for the ranch gun.
Wanting to ban something because of how it looks is beyond stupid...
That;s racist!!
Thinker101
Diamond Member
- Mar 25, 2017
- 26,283
- 17,575
- 1,415
Yep, that ought to boost investments...dumbass.
pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 82,944
- 33,709
- 2,250
Why do we not care about the investment options of the ditch digger paying more in taxes?
Thinker101
Diamond Member
- Mar 25, 2017
- 26,283
- 17,575
- 1,415
WTF, you want to tax their investments. You've got to be the dumbest person on this board.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
Soros Group Behind Court Order Blocking Trump’s Deportation of Violent Illegals- Started by Mack The Finger
- Replies: 1
-
Ukraine has a new motorcycle attack unit that rushes gun-toting troops into battle on off-road bikes
- Started by Doc7505
- Replies: 0
-
-
