Oldestyle
Diamond Member
Capital share has nothing to do with tax burden. As usual you're talking out of your ass and looking like a complete buffoon in the process! What's your education level? I'm guessing a GED?yes, i do. nuances dear right winger. capital share and tax burden are not unrelated in the statement. context must mean something. but, then you are a right winger who loves to sacrifice the End to the Means.So you don't have a clue what the term capital share means...do you? LOL Why do you do that? You're just talking nonsense and it's obvious you don't know what most of the terms you use mean!I am not one who only has diversion instead of valid arguments. Answer the question.Ah, Daniel? What are you referring to when you talk about "fair capital share"? Do you know what the term capital share denotes?What is obvious is that right wingers are clueless and Causeless about economics and only have red herrings and straw men for their arguments.Does anyone understand what you post, Daniel? Do YOU? Most of the time, quite frankly, it's gibberish. You remind me of students I've had that thought if they filled their work with big words and confused prose that it would obscure the fact that they didn't know what they were talking about.Nothing the clueless and Causeless right wing can understand, apparently.Has Daniel ever really answered a question put to him in this string? With something that even vaguely resembled a cogent thought?
Raise the minimum wage until the Poor pay their fair capital share of the tax burden. It should be easy for anyone but right wingers to understand.
According to some studies the minimum wage should be eighteen dollars an hour after accounting for inflation.