Biden regrets exiting the race

If smug twatburger Hillary Clinton would have made a final run through Blue Wall states, she would have won.

Stupid evil c-word bitch did not….and she lost.

It was not PUTIN.

SHOUDDA WOUDDA COUDDA is for losers like Hillary.
 
Last edited:
Harris wasn't the problem. Had Biden withdrawn in 2023, she'd have had enough time to build a campaign and a following. She did far better than Biden would have done, had he stayed in the race.

The biggest problem with Biden staying as long as he did is that the best argument against Trump was neutered- that he's too old and not in command of his mental faculties. Kind of hard to make that argument when you held onto Biden as long as you did.

I think that you can make the argument that America was too racist/misogynistic to elect a black woman, but that's a reflection on the American people, not Harris, who was a perfectly fine candidate.

But the biggest problem was that Biden was unable to get out there and match Trump's media presence. Trump could falsely scream all day the economy was terrible and immigrants are going to kill us all, but if no one is out there countering that, that argument wins the day.

As Woody Allen once observed, "90% of success is just showing up."
Harris was ALL the problem - Colored/Woman/and nothing to show for in regards to a solid political experience - required for a US President. - the moment she got nominated for the job - it was Cristal clear to me, The human scumbag will win.

Even with a one year election run and more - the above mentioned factors/hurdles could not have been taken by her - see even a White Woman with loads of political experience and a big name - loosing out to a human scumbag in 2016.

The right choice by the Democrats should have been, to concentrate onto a winning running-mate, - who in-turn could have simply replaced a senile politician in e.g. a televised political-show, and within month after the election.
 
If smug twatburger Hillary Clinton would have made a final run through Blue Wall states, she would have won.

Stupid evil c-word bitch did not….and she lost.

It was not PUTIN.

SHOUDDA WOUDDA COUDDA is for losers like Hillary.

So it's Hillary's fault that you voted for Trump and Trump is going to fuck things up?

Talk about your victim blaming.

Trump isn't even back in yet, and you are trying to divert blame.
 
Mac1958 is a pompous ass who thinks he's the smartest guy in the room.
like when he said.....The egos of politicians are something most people couldn't imagine?......of course mac can imagine it....
 
If smug twatburger Hillary Clinton would have made a final run through Blue Wall states, she would have won.

Stupid evil c-word bitch did not….and she lost.

It was not PUTIN.

SHOUDDA WOUDDA COUDDA is for losers like Hillary.
Nope. She largely overcame Putin’s interference.

It was Comey she couldn’t overcome
 
..... Leninist groupies know you represent the receding leg of the intelligence bell curve yet you insist on inflicting your regressive politico-religious ideologies on others.
Replace "Leninist" or Lefty/Libs with MAGA nitwit's - and you got it ALL correct - for ALL radical political factions.
 
Harris was ALL the problem - Colored/Woman/and nothing to show for in regards to a solid political experience - required for a US President. - the moment she got nominated for the job - it was Cristal clear to me, The human scumbag will win.

She had solid experience.

4 years as Veep
4 years in the Senate
6 years as attorney General
7 years as district attorney.

Probably more experience than Trump had (never elected to political office), or Obama (4 years as senator, 7 in the state legislature) or Bush (six years as a governor)

Now, if you are saying a black woman should have MORE experience than these MEN, that's a different argument. Not a very good one, but a different argument.


Even with a one year election run and more - the above mentioned factors/hurdles could not have been taken by her - see even a White Woman with loads of political experience and a big name - loosing out to a human scumbag in 2016.

I'm not sure why you think Misogyny is a good thing. It isn't.

The right choice by the Democrats should have been, to concentrate onto a winning running-mate, - who in-turn could have simply replaced a senile politician in e.g. a televised political-show, and within month after the election.

Not really.

Let's review the two times that an incumbent president dropped out during a race.

1968 with LBJ and 1952 with Harry Truman.

LBJ is a particularly telling example. He dropped out after losing New Hampshire. A lot earlier than Biden did. He was succeeded by Hubert Humphrey, who barely lost to Richard Nixon (a human scumbag, by your standards.)

Same thing with Harry Truman. He dropped out, was replaced by Adlai Stevenson, who lost handily to Eisenhower.

Nixon (the first time), Humphrey, Mondale, and Gore were all "winning" running mates, but they all flubbed it when they came up to bat themselves.

The ideal time for Biden to have dropped out was in 2022. He didn't do that, and we got the result that we will all regret.
 
Harris was ALL the problem - Colored/Woman/and nothing to show for in regards to a solid political experience - required for a US President. - the moment she got nominated for the job - it was Cristal clear to me, The human scumbag will win.

Come on man, be realistic. "Nothing" beside:
  • Getting elected DA in a very large city,
  • Getting elected to State Attorney General for the largest state in the union (by population),
  • Getting elected as Senator for the largest state in the union (by population),
  • 4 Years as Vice President of the United States.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not a Harris supporter, I think Binden screwed the pouch last fall.

But to say she had "nothing" is kind of our there.

WW
 
She had solid experience.

4 years as Veep
4 years in the Senate
6 years as attorney General
7 years as district attorney.

Probably more experience than Trump had (never elected to political office), or Obama (4 years as senator, 7 in the state legislature) or Bush (six years as a governor)

Now, if you are saying a black woman should have MORE experience than these MEN, that's a different argument. Not a very good one, but a different argument.




I'm not sure why you think Misogyny is a good thing. It isn't.



Not really.

Let's review the two times that an incumbent president dropped out during a race.

1968 with LBJ and 1952 with Harry Truman.

LBJ is a particularly telling example. He dropped out after losing New Hampshire. A lot earlier than Biden did. He was succeeded by Hubert Humphrey, who barely lost to Richard Nixon (a human scumbag, by your standards.)

Same thing with Harry Truman. He dropped out, was replaced by Adlai Stevenson, who lost handily to Eisenhower.

Nixon (the first time), Humphrey, Mondale, and Gore were all "winning" running mates, but they all flubbed it when they came up to bat themselves.

The ideal time for Biden to have dropped out was in 2022. He didn't do that, and we got the result that we will all regret.
Harris, like Hillary was a weak candidate....Period.

The bottom line is that Democrats think American's are stupid...And they still haven't learned...
 
Biden said he was talking about the Governors race for Maccu Piccu
 
Harris, like Hillary was a weak candidate....Period.

The bottom line is that Democrats think American's are stupid...And they still haven't learned...
Because they were women?
 
Because they were women?
No, they were weak because they were....I think America would elect a female President, if she actually had the chops to win....Neither of those two did....One was a highly corrupt individual, and the other was dumb as a door knob that couldn't put a sentence together without launching into incoherent babble....
 
She had solid experience.

4 years as Veep
4 years in the Senate
6 years as attorney General
7 years as district attorney.

Probably more experience than Trump had (never elected to political office), or Obama (4 years as senator, 7 in the state legislature) or Bush (six years as a governor)

Now, if you are saying a black woman should have MORE experience than these MEN, that's a different argument. Not a very good one, but a different argument.




I'm not sure why you think Misogyny is a good thing. It isn't.



Not really.

Let's review the two times that an incumbent president dropped out during a race.

1968 with LBJ and 1952 with Harry Truman.

LBJ is a particularly telling example. He dropped out after losing New Hampshire. A lot earlier than Biden did. He was succeeded by Hubert Humphrey, who barely lost to Richard Nixon (a human scumbag, by your standards.)

Same thing with Harry Truman. He dropped out, was replaced by Adlai Stevenson, who lost handily to Eisenhower.

Nixon (the first time), Humphrey, Mondale, and Gore were all "winning" running mates, but they all flubbed it when they came up to bat themselves.

The ideal time for Biden to have dropped out was in 2022. He didn't do that, and we got the result that we will all regret.
To nominate a WOMAN and especially a COLORED WOMAN - with additionally no economic and foreign affairs political experience whatsoever, nor any relevant Senate/Congress function is about the dumbest thing one can do in the USA. No matter if she candidates for 5 month or 4 years.

Even the human scumbag is viewed/judged upon as an economic "expert" by his crowd and as a foreign-affairs "expert" - see all the posts here on USMB. I haven't seen or can recall any post from a democrat supporter, who propagated this in view of Harris. Only that she might be the lesser Weevil of the two.

And who the heck in the USA or the rest of the world - had ever heard about Harris before her nomination?
Even this nutcase from Alaska or the China hater Pelosi - were far better known, even globally.
 
Replace "Leninist" or Lefty/Libs with MAGA nitwit's - and you got it ALL correct - for ALL radical political factions.
Replace ''waste of bandwidth" with a post from Krusty - you have all the spam you need.
 
To nominate a WOMAN and especially a COLORED WOMAN - with additionally no economic and foreign affairs political experience whatsoever, nor any relevant Senate/Congress function is about the dumbest thing one can do in the USA. No matter if she candidates for 5 month or 4 years.

Even the human scumbag is viewed/judged upon as an economic "expert" by his crowd and as a foreign-affairs "expert" - see all the posts here on USMB. I haven't seen or can recall any post from a democrat supporter, who propagated this in view of Harris. Only that she might be the lesser Weevil of the two.

And who the heck in the USA or the rest of the world - had ever heard about Harris before her nomination?
Even this nutcase from Alaska or the China hater Pelosi - were far better known, even globally.

At least she knows what a woman is
 
Come on man, be realistic. "Nothing" beside:
  • Getting elected DA in a very large city,
  • Getting elected to State Attorney General for the largest state in the union (by population),
  • Getting elected as Senator for the largest state in the union (by population),
  • 4 Years as Vice President of the United States.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not a Harris supporter, I think Binden screwed the pouch last fall.

But to say she had "nothing" is kind of our there.

WW
Sorry - IMO that simply doesn't hold for "qualification"
And which Republican or MAGA, or even a Democrat in e.g. Texas or Florida cares about some Californian DA or State Attorney General?

Additionally she had made absolutely no noticeable impact on whatever political issue as Vice. - maybe also thanks to Biden.

So Harris as a presidential candidate was an absolute no go, from the very beginning - Just my opinion.
 
Harris wasn't the problem. Had Biden withdrawn in 2023, she'd have had enough time to build a campaign and a following. She did far better than Biden would have done, had he stayed in the race.

The biggest problem with Biden staying as long as he did is that the best argument against Trump was neutered- that he's too old and not in command of his mental faculties. Kind of hard to make that argument when you held onto Biden as long as you did.

I think that you can make the argument that America was too racist/misogynistic to elect a black woman, but that's a reflection on the American people, not Harris, who was a perfectly fine candidate.

But the biggest problem was that Biden was unable to get out there and match Trump's media presence. Trump could falsely scream all day the economy was terrible and immigrants are going to kill us all, but if no one is out there countering that, that argument wins the day.

As Woody Allen once observed, "90% of success is just showing up."
Keep shaming Americans as being Racist and/or Misogynistic when you people don’t get your outcomes. It’s working wonders. I guess Obama was fortunate enough to get voted President when America was not feeling racist but when he saw the numbers, he tried to shame Black men into not being misogynistic. How’d that work out?

Americans who chose lower gas prices and egg prices and not to have their unrealized capital gains taxed all of the sudden took on the look of racists and misogynists.
 
Keep shaming Americans as being Racist and/or Misogynistic when you people don’t get your outcomes. It’s working wonders. I guess Obama was fortunate enough to get voted President when America was not feeling racist but when he saw the numbers, he tried to shame Black men into not being misogynistic. How’d that work out?

Americans who chose lower gas prices and egg prices and not to have their unrealized capital gains taxed all of the sudden took on the look of racists and misogynists.

Obama got elected because Bush had fucked up the economy and our position in the world that the GOP couldn't make a credible argument.

If you voted to put Trump back in because eggs were too expensive, you are going to be in for a shock.

 
Back
Top Bottom