Biden is giving the 2nd highest civilian award to the leaders of the Jan. 6 congressional committee

[AntonToo]

Then you all had to pick the most corrupt lawyer in GA to even try and bring a case

You obviously don't even understand the crimnal cases involving Trump's J6 antics.

GA case had to do just with Trump's GA attempts to overturn the election result in that state.

Special prosecutor Smith had separate criminal charges against Trump:

https://www.justice.gov/storage/US_v_Trump_23_cr_257.pdf

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Zero evidence that Trump offered the National Guard?

YES.

 

[Hollie]

I suggest you read the intirety of my post before replying, here again is the second part of what I've said:

But even it is was just about J6 he is still wrong - there has not been any repudiation of criminal charges against Trump on their merrits in a court of law.

I suggest you emerge from your coma and understand that your juvenile, "but...but.....but even if", totally unrelated is just a desperate attempt to sidestep and deflect.

 

[Hollie]

You obviously don't even understand the crimnal cases involving Trump's J6 antics.

GA case had to do just with Trump's GA attempts to overturn the election result in that state.

Special prosecutor Smith had separate criminal charges against Trump:

Timeline: Special counsel's probe into Trump's efforts to overturn 2020 election

Here's a look at how special counsel Jack Smith's investigation into former President Donald Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election results has unfolded.

abcnews.go.com

Isn't this the same Jack Smith case that is sidelined by Jack Smith?

Redirect Notice

www.google.com

 

[AntonToo]

Zero evidence that Trump offered the National Guard?

YES.

Doesn't even matter if he did, it can't refute the fact that he watched his MAGAtards violently breach the capitol and refused to try to interfere, as even as Republicans were screaming at him to finally tell them to stop.

He blatantly violated his oath of office and his illegal scheming to overturn 2020 election make his motivations crystal clear.

 

[AntonToo]

Isn't this the same Jack Smith case that is sidelined by Jack Smith?

Redirect Notice

www.google.com

Of course it is, he can't continue a case against a sitting president according to the DOJ guidelines.

Smith said exactly that in his statement explaining why he is halting the case.

 

[Hollie]

Doesn't even matter if he did, it can't refute the fact that he watched his MAGAtards violently breach the capitol and refused to try to interfere, as even as Republicans were screaming at him to finally tell them to stop.

Your opinions don't matter. Trump called for peaceful protests.

Pelosi and mayor Bowser refused the National Guard as the FBI assets incited the mob.

Pelosi watched as her leftturds incited riots.

 

[Hollie]

Of course it is, he can't continue a case against a sitting president according to the DOJ guidelines.

Smith said exactly that in his statement explaining why he is halting the case.

Trump is not a sitting president. There are no DOJ guidelines regarding the case. The DOJ does not make laws.

 

[AntonToo]

Your opinions don't matter. Trump called for peaceful protests.

Thats bullshit - he also said FIGHT LIKE HELL OR WE ARE NOT GOING TO HAVE A COUNTRY, so just on what he told them it's a mixed bag at best.

But aside from what he said at the rally we also have HIS ACTIONS DURING THE ATTACK - he refused to attempt to stop his MAGAs while they were violently breaching the capitol. He didn't tell them to stop, he didn't tell them to leave as even Republicans were screaming at him to do.

Trump was bi-partisanly IMPEACHED for this blatant abandonment of his oath of office. And even McCarthy who didn't vote to impeach was proposing a censure for Trump's actions.

 

[Hollie]

Thats bullshit - he also said FIGHT LIKE HELL OR WE ARE NOT GOING TO HAVE A COUNTRY, so just on what he told them it's a mixed bag at best.

But aside from what he said at the rally we also have HIS ACTIONS DURING THE ATTACK - he refused to attempt to stop his MAGAs while they were violently breaking into the capitol. He didn't tell them to stop, he didn't tell them to leave as even Republicans were screaming at him to do.

Your emotional meltdown is funny.

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/trump-calls-for-peace-tells-protesters-to-go-home-idUSKBN29B2UT/

 

[Nostra]

I'm to the left of Bernie. I don't have a party.

There is a reason people to the left of commie Bernie can’t form a party. You are complete nutbags.

 

[struth]

It was never tossed on the merrits, you are lying.

The only thing that happened to halt it was Trump getting re-elected.

Yes it was, they couldn’t get their accusations to trial because the entire thing was illegal political prosecution

 

[struth]

You obviously don't even understand the crimnal cases involving Trump's J6 antics.

GA case had to do just with Trump's GA attempts to overturn the election result in that state.

Special prosecutor Smith had separate criminal charges against Trump:

https://www.justice.gov/storage/US_v_Trump_23_cr_257.pdf

I do. It was all a sad political prosecution with corrupt officials that abused their offices to keep power

 

[Jroc]

Belive me, I don't mind you shitting yourself in public like this.

Push you just a little on facts and you are instantly reduced to a muttering animal.

Who's going to be the next president in 17 days? who's the one that's laughing?.. it ain't you fool

 

[AntonToo]

Your emotional meltdown is funny.

You being unable to refute even a word of what I've said, while calling me emotional is not funny, it's sad.

 

[AntonToo]

Who's going to be the next president in 17 days? who's the one that's laughing?.. it ain't you fool

How does that make that poster's emotional muttering of nonsense any less embarassing?

It's doesn't, you are simply deflecting.

 

[AntonToo]

I do. It was all a sad political prosecution with corrupt officials that abused their offices to keep power

Oh well now that you throw out yet another silly, baseless assertion everything is different.

Right.

 

[Jroc]

How does that make that poster's emotional muttering of nonsense any less embarassing?

It's doesn't, you are simply deflecting.

It makes your crying and whining useless .... Because the people rejected your fake narrative... Deal with it

 

[AntonToo]

It makes your crying and whining useless .... Because the people rejected your fake narrative... Deal with it

Thats not a substantive refute of anything.

I've asked what wasn't truthful on J6 committee's historic findings - not a single on of you assertive fools was able to make a coherent explaination.

Thats the buttom line.

 

[Hollie]

You being unable to refute even a word of what I've said, while calling me emotional is not funny, it's sad.

Another of your emotional meltdowns.

Your claim that Trump incited riots and didn't act to subdue the protestors was refuted.

Learn to lose gracefully.