Biden is giving the 2nd highest civilian award to the leaders of the Jan. 6 congressional committee

I didn't absolve Pelosi. She possbily could've had more forsight about potential violence, could have been proactively pushing for more security. But thats not some nefarious intent, thats just oversight and it doesn doesn't change historically significans facts of what happened on J6.

So again, what findings of the J6 committee do you think were not truthful?
Of course it was intent. FBI "assets" inciting a crowd was no accident.

So again, a partisan, dem controlled "committee" found what it was intended to find.
 
Every ******* one.

Wrong. The correct answer is NONE.

Trump was convicted on 34 counts of falsifying bussiness records in the first degree, in a court of law, by a jury of peers Trump's lawyers vetted.

The rest of the criminal charges against him were never refuted on merrit in the court of law and are the cases are now suspended because he won 2024 eleciton.


Whaen you say "every ******* one", you are saying a blatant counterfactual.
 
Trump was "seeing"?
Well then..........WHY didn't Trump request any NG troops?
After all, it was "Peaceful", right?

One) There was no request.
Two) Pelosi has no authority to call for or decline a NG request.

No he didn't, he never made a request.
Trump offered the National Guard. Nancy Pelosi and Muriel Bowser declined that offer. Why?
 
Wrong. The correct answer is NONE.

Trump was convicted on 34 counts of falsifying bussiness records in the court of law, by a jury of peers Trump's lawyers vetted.

The rest of the criminal charges against him were never refuted on merrit in the court of law and are the cases are now suspended because he won 2024 eleciton.
Did you not know that the silly New York Clown Show orchestrated by Alvin Bragg had nothing to do with Jan. 6?

You're having another emotional meltdown.
 
Of course it was intent. FBI "assets" inciting a crowd was no accident.

Again, where is evidence that FBI assets were inciting someone?

FBI having someone in the crowd informing them of whats happening is VERY different from FBI leading an attack on congress. So where is evidence for that?

I keep asking and you keep not providing it - would YOU take yourself seriously?
 
The whole was a set up ....
Wrong. The correct answer is NONE.

Trump was convicted on 34 counts of falsifying bussiness records in the first degree, in a court of law, by a jury of peers Trump's lawyers vetted.

The rest of the criminal charges against him were never refuted on merrit in the court of law and are the cases are now suspended because he won 2024 eleciton.


Whaen you say "every ******* one", you are saying a blatant counterfactual.
His "peers" are leftist trump-hating new York nutjobs... In spite of all of that Trump is the next president get over it fool
 
Again, where is evidence that FBI assets were inciting someone?

FBI having someone in the crowd informing them of whats happening is VERY different from FBI leading an attack on congress. So where is evidence for that?

I keep asking and you keep not providing it - would YOU take yourself seriously?
Ray Epps. You were given that name before and you hoped to deny and sidestep.
 
Still nothing about the bomb at the DNC 🤔

 
Wrong. The correct answer is NONE.

Trump was convicted on 34 counts of falsifying bussiness records in the first degree, in a court of law, by a jury of peers Trump's lawyers vetted.

The rest of the criminal charges against him were never refuted on merrit in the court of law and are the cases are now suspended because he won 2024 eleciton.


Whaen you say "every ******* one", you are saying a blatant counterfactual.
It was a New York trial...on charges brought by a far left prosecutor who promised to "get" Trump...presided over by a judge who contributed his own money to an anti-Trump group...and who's jury was chosen from a jury pool that was overwhelmingly Democratic! How is that in any way "just"? That verdict will be thrown out when it's appealed to a higher court because it was a farce from beginning to end.
 
Wrong. The correct answer is NONE.

Trump was convicted on 34 counts of falsifying bussiness records in the first degree, in a court of law, by a jury of peers Trump's lawyers vetted.

The rest of the criminal charges against him were never refuted on merrit in the court of law and are the cases are now suspended because he won 2024 eleciton.


Whaen you say "every ******* one", you are saying a blatant counterfactual.
**** YOU and your SOVIET LAWFARE BULLSHIT.
It's all GARBAGE, just like you and the rest of the demented avenger subverted demoralized Stalinist Marxist Leninist zombie ASSHOLES.

Now spaz out about it. DANCE MOTHER ******.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
:dev3:
 
Did you not know that the silly New York Clown Show orchestrated by Alvin Bragg had nothing to do with Jan. 6?

You're having another emotional meltdown.
You need to read better, his comment was not about J6 specifically, but general prosecution of Trump.

But even it is was just about J6 he is still wrong - there has not been any repudiation of criminal charges against Trump on their merrits in a court of law.

The cases were legitimate and strong on the merits, even according to Trump's own Attorney General.
 
**** YOU and your SOVIET LAWFARE BULLSHIT.
It's all GARBAGE, just like you and the rest of the demented avenger subverted demoralized Stalinist Marxist Leninist zombie ASSHOLES.

Now spaz out about it. DANCE MOTHER ******.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
:dev3:

Belive me, I don't mind you shitting yourself in public like this.

Push you just a little on facts and you are instantly reduced to a muttering animal.
 
You need to read better, his comment was not about J6 specifically, but general prosecution of Trump.

But even it is was ju8st about J6 he is still wrong - there has not been any repudiation of criminal charges against Trump on their merrits in a court of law.
You need to pay attention. Trying to vilify Trump because your TDS overwhelms you is your excuse for introducing the Bragg, New York Clown Show that has nothing to do with Jan 6.
 
You need to read better, his comment was not about J6 specifically, but general prosecution of Trump.

But even it is was just about J6 he is still wrong - there has not been any repudiation of criminal charges against Trump on their merrits in a court of law.

The cases were legitimate and strong on the merits, even according to Trump's own Attorney General.
The illegally appointed special prosecutor couldn’t get the cases to trial because they were bogus

Then you all had to pick the most corrupt lawyer in GA to even try and bring a case

It was pathetic and tossed out of court
 
15th post
You need to pay attention. Trying to vilify Trump because your TDS overwhelms you is your excuse for introducing the Bragg, New York Clown Show that has nothing to do with Jan 6.
I suggest you read the intirety of my post before replying, here again is the second part of what I've said:

But even it is was just about J6 he is still wrong - there has not been any repudiation of criminal charges against Trump on their merrits in a court of law.
 
It was pathetic and tossed out of court

It was never tossed on the merrits, you are lying.

The only thing that happened to halt it was Trump getting re-elected.
 
Back
Top Bottom