wamose
Diamond Member
Garland and his DOJ are absolutely corrupted. Garland investigating voter fraud is like any criminal investigating their own crime. Totally invalid. Garland is acting like Biden's personal attorney.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Garland and his DOJ are absolutely corrupted. Garland investigating voter fraud is like any criminal investigating their own crime."
Can you type a little louder, I can’t hear you?Don't mean shit to me whether you disagree or not. There is zero evidence of fraud.
THE FUCKING TRAITOR FUCKING LOST THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!!!
audit the fraudulent 2020 election results
the left has given great examples of this being acceptable.Translation...Dems stole it and are throwing a conniption fit over the audits.
Only Dems can contest an election and try to impeach a president for 4 straight years. If Reps dare contest a Dem win they are destroying the fabric of democracy. The double standards have become so blatant I call BS on the entire Dem party. They can go F themselves, to infinity.the left has given great examples of this being acceptable.
hillary still insists she won. go rag on her ass now.
A history of contested presidential elections, from Samuel Tilden to Al Gore
The elections of 1876, 1888, 1960 and 2000 were among the most contentious in American history.theconversation.comOpinion | Democrats Have Been Shameless About Your Presidential Vote Too (Published 2021)
After the 2000, 2004 and 2016 elections, they objected to counting electoral totals.www.nytimes.comFour Times the Results of a Presidential Election Were Contested
"Rigged" may not be the way to describe them, but there were definitely some shenanigans happeningwww.smithsonianmag.com
"You see here, you have a nice little store. It would be a shame if something was to happen to it, wouldn't it? Now, we can make sure nothing bad happens to your little store, so don't rock the boat too much, got it?Well, it seems they've made no move to get into state's business.
Rather, they are articulating a standard that if you are going to be shuffling completed ballots around the state, around the country, by unqualified, or at any rate, inexperienced actors.......well, then just know that there are specific laws protecting those ballots. So don't do something foolish. Lest you really do trigger a wider interest, a higher authority, to step in to protect the citizens.
But, in the meantime, ......... just be prudent and responsible.
That's the message, it seems to me, that the DOJ was offering.
Biden DOJ Steps In – Issues Guidelines Cautioning States Performing Audits of Election Results
28 Jul 2021 ~~ By Jim Hoft
Unreal! The Biden DOJ put out a warning to states who choose to audit the fraudulent 2020 election results!
First, they threatened Arizona. Now they’re threatening the rest of the country!
ABC News reported:
The Justice Department on Wednesday released guidance intended to caution states embarking on so-called post-election ‘audits’ of vote counts for the 2020 presidential election that they must not run afoul of federal voting laws.The guidance, previously previewed last month by Attorney General Merrick Garland in his policy address on voting rights, outlines federal statutes that the department says elections officials must adhere to during such “audits,” such as preserving all federal elections materials and making sure they’re not tampered with. “This document sets down a marker that says the Justice Department is concerned about this, and we will be following this closely,” a DOJ official told reporters on a media conference call Wednesday.The guidance echoes a warning sent by the department back in May to the Republican-run audit in Arizona, warning officials there that all election records must be preserved and expressing concern about the state handing over election materials to the private contractor group Cyber Ninjas… …DOJ officials on Wednesday declined to provide any update on the department’s review of the Arizona “audit.” But the guidance comes as Republicans in several other states have expressed interest or are already moving forward with similarly partisan reviews of the 2020 vote count in certain jurisdictions — despite lacking any evidence of widespread fraud. Here is the DOJ warning that is clearly unconstitutional. States have the right to control their elections — Not Merrick Garland or Joe Biden.
Comment:
Obviously Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrats in control of D.C. feel that they must control States and their rights of government. PMS/DSA Democrats forget that individual States allow the U.S. government to exist.
State legislatures have absolute authority over that. Either Merrick Garland is as demented as Joey Xi or hasn't yet realized he's gone full Biden. Never go full Biden.
Please Note:
Under the doctrine of states’ rights, the federal government is not allowed to interfere with the powers of the states reserved or implied to them by the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
PMS/DSA Democrats Communists have thought things through for themselves. Merrick Garland is already working on legal framework to fight "white terrorism" over January 6.What Are States' Rights?
States rights are the rights and power that fall to the states, rather than to the federal government, according to the Constitution.www.thoughtco.com
It means that Communists will instigate martial law over the next display of discontent, there will be a false Flag Operation if necessary and the audit, this little pastime of the peasants will be brought down from midair.
Actually we are not U.S. Citizens, but individual State citizens...
This can also be confirmed in the definitions section of Title 5 USC, Title 26 USC, and Title 1 USC.
"A US citizen is a piece of property. If you read any of those old court cases prior to the civil war where slavery was the issue, the debate was ALWAYS over property rights, therefore a US citizen, is a SLAVE.The Fourteenth Amendment defines what a US citizen is;“Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States,…..”The so-called Fourteenth Amendment criminally converts US citizenship completely upside down from what the founding fathers intended.“The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the “citizenship” to the agencies of government.”"Therefore comes the translation of Garland's blathering edict: - They're scared and afraid that the individual State audits will, I believe, uniformly show widespread and massive election fraud perpetrated by the PMS/DSA Democrat Commie Leftists.
Don't mean shit to me whether you disagree or not. There is zero evidence of fraud.
THE FUCKING TRAITOR FUCKING LOST THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!!!
"...we allow these crazed idiots get by with treason and overthrow of a leget (sic) government .......Democrats are evil or stupid ....... God gave us strong limb trees for a reason ...... SOME SHORT PIECES OF HEMP ROPE AND TIME TO BEG AT THE GALLOWS.
The audits have already been completed, and the votes counted. Enough already! Tump supporting repubs are trying to appease the grifter tump who was a loser who will not accept his loss. Instead, he is usurping our democracy with his Jan 6 insurrection and now bogus fraudit claims.Democrats say the election was clean and pure while acting like guilty cheaters. Why do they care if a state chooses to audit itself?
Shouldn't Democrats encourage more audits?
It is as plain as the nose on your face.Please type bolder, I can’t hear you.
Except, of course, there was no election fraud, as the highly partisan ninja group discovered.Garland is following the Democrat tradition of influencing outcomes to favor the party line. Holder and Lynch made that policy SOP. Garland is doing his best to cover up the election fraud that resulted in him having the AG job. That in itself is probably a conflict of interest.
That is not a 'reminder.'This thread came to mind when a day or two ago I saw an article about Kevin McCarthy's notice to the telecommunications companies notifying them not to comply with preservation requests for phone records belonging to individuals possibly connected to the January 6.
McCarthy said in a statement complying with the request would put Americans “in the crosshairs of a surveillance state,” claiming the companies would also be “in violation of federal law” and “subject to losing their ability to operate” in the U.S.
McCarthy added that if companies “still choose to violate federal law,” Republicans in Congress “will not forget” if they take the majority in 2022 and will “hold them fully accountable under the law.
I have no problem with any reminders of the law from either side.
McCarthy Warns Telecom Firms GOP ‘Will Not Forget’ If They Hand Over Records Of Alleged Jan. 6 Collaborators
The comment comes after Rep. Jim Banks, who was blocked from serving on the Jan. 6 panel, called to punish its members if the GOP takes the majority.www.forbes.com
You cannot support the one and be against the other without doublethink.