Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 120,683
- 126,626
- 3,645
ONE weapon was a couple of blocks FROM the insurrection, a number of weapons were 5 miles from the insurrection.
but none were AT THE INSURRECTION
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ONE weapon was a couple of blocks FROM the insurrection, a number of weapons were 5 miles from the insurrection.
but none were AT THE INSURRECTION
moron
they weren't insurrectionists til they got to the insurrection.
Enrique Tarrio: spent that day in jail on a different chargeFirst that's not what the law says.
Example: Zacarias Moussaoui convicted of the 9-11 hijackings, even though he wasn't anywhere near the scene of the crime.
A hijacker doesn't have to be at the hijacking, to be guilty of hijacking, and thus adjudicated a hijacker.moron
they weren't insurrectionists til they got to the insurrection.
A hijacker doesn't have to be at the hijacking, to be guilty of hijacking, and thus adjudicated a hijacker.
An insurrectionist doesn't have to be at the insurrection, to be guilty of insurrection, and thus adjudicated an insurrectionist.
That's the law.
You said claiming the insurrectionists has AR-15's was "pulled out of my ass"
Well, not only did they have AR-15's they had an entire arsenal stashed 20 minutes from the Capitol.
Rhodes even regretted that he didn't call for his proud boys to bring the guns to the Capitol.
Well this is stupid.You used the word 'insurrectionists' implying that they had the weapons while carrying on an 'insurrection', which they clearly did not.
Actually the guy with the pickup truck was carrying a pistol and a revolver around Washington DC that morning. Including walking to the rally.You used the word 'insurrectionists' implying that they had the weapons while carrying on an 'insurrection', which they clearly did not.
I'm sure many of the people in the crowd that day had weapons, just not on their person. It was a stupid hill to make a stand on, meaningless.
An example. Three guys rob a bank. Only one of them has a gun, and only two of them enter the bank. The third is the get-away driver. If they get caught, all three are charged with armed bank robbery.Well this is stupid.
We call them insurrectionists, because they violently attempted to overthrow an election, and thus a government.
Spare me the whiny tantrum, I won't read it.
And rightfully so.An example. Three guys rob a bank. Only one of them has a gun, and only two of them enter the bank. The third is the get-away driver. If they get caught, all three are charged with armed bank robbery.
Even though two weren't armed, and one didn't go in the bank.
But that's the law.
the driver is usually charged as an accessory after the fact.And rightfully so.
Furthermore, they don't get a pass just because they are morons and failures, and the bank robbery doesn't succeed.
Charges for aiding felonies are also felonies.the driver is usually charged as an accessory after the fact.
Absolutely wrong.the driver is usually charged as an accessory after the fact.
Aiding and abetting is punishable the same as carrying out the original crime.Charges for aiding felonies are also felonies.
Why, thank you Faun. Very kind. Enjoy the cruise.Glad you landed safely.
Actually the guy with the pickup truck was carrying a pistol and a revolver around Washington DC that morning. Including walking to the rally.
So he was armed, and dangerous.

Who was at the head of a violent mob. Whoever came through that window/door was getting shot. The Trumper sissies, in a surprise to nobody, let it be her.Not as dangerous as a so called protector that shot and killed an unarmed woman,![]()
18 U.S. Code § 3 - Accessory after the fact
U.S. Code
Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.
Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years.
I remember saying that.assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.