Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That assembly is on public property, not at the homes of justices.The part where the first amendment says the government can’t infringe on your free speech or the right to peacefully assemble.
As long as you democrats can threaten violence on your target all is well I guess.
Hate speech is protected. Threatening justices isn’t.
Is peacefully protesting on a sidewalk protected by the first amendment? I think it is.
They were not on a sidewalk, moron!Hate speech is protected. Threatening justices isn’t.
Is peacefully protesting on a sidewalk protected by the first amendment? I think it is.
Intent can be ascertained by actions.
Let me see if I understand you correctly: the federal government, with teams of lawyers at it's disposal, enacted 18 USC 1507 years ago but little Golfing Gator of USMB fame declares that it is unenforceable?
And you have been a legal scholar since when?
That assembly is on public property, not at the homes of justices.
You must be one of those who believe it is perfectly legal to scream "Fire!" in a crowded theater.
You also probably believe that it is perfectly legal to scream "Theater!" in a crowded firehouse!
No, but he has been an idiot since joining the Marines. If he hadn't become one, they would have kicked him out!Intent can be ascertained by actions.
Let me see if I understand you correctly: the federal government, with teams of lawyers at it's disposal, enacted 18 USC 1507 years ago but little Golfing Gator of USMB fame declares that it is unenforceable?
And you have been a legal scholar since when?
Probably zero, because no libtards were stupid enough to try!How many times has it been enforced since it was written all those years ago?
Seems like that’s going to be the hard part since it’s not being prosecuted.Then get yourself arrested and challenge it.
I don't know and that is irrelevant.How many times has it been enforced since it was written all those years ago?
They were not on a sidewalk, moron!
They were not on the fucking sidewalk, dipshit!Why? As long as they remain on a public sidewalk, it fair for judges to harass whoever they want at their homes.
It has everything to do with the first amendment.Moron, it has NOTHING to do with the 1st Amendment!
They were not on the fucking sidewalk, dipshit!
It's contained in that right of privacy all the pro-choice people say is written in the Constitution.Great, so explain your logic for why the First Amendment protects protesting justices from a public sidewalk outside of a courthouse but the First Amendment doesn't protect protesting justices from a public sidewalk outside of their residence...
The 1st Amendment has legal restrictions. You are just too stupid to realize it.It has everything to do with the first amendment.
I don't know and that is irrelevant.
It's contained in that right of privacy all the pro-choice people say is written in the Constitution.
Weak even for you.This will blow your little mind, but the Govt makes all sorts of unenforceable rules and laws
Commie. We don’t need state approval to speak.The 1st Amendment has legal restrictions. You are just too stupid to realize it.
