Biden Denies RFK Jr. Secret Service Protection For The THIRD Time

What an A-hole Biden is. RFK Jr. has already had his house broken into by an intruder. There's no doubt that Biden wants RFK Jr. eliminated because the recent polls show him pulling 17% of the vote away from him in swing states. If I remember correctly, when Obama ran Bush gave him Secret Service protection within 3 months. RFK Jr. deserves it. There's no doubt another Sirhan Sirhan is out there wanting to bump off another Kennedy.

That's just petty, mean, spiteful, and inexcusable conduct on Biden's part. He doesn't want to give RFK Jr.'s campaign any semblance of legitimacy, so he won't even grant him Secret Service protection, even though Kennedy has received death threats, even though an armed man was arrested at one of his rallies a few months ago, and even though an intruder was caught trying to break into his home.
 
That's just petty, mean, spiteful, and inexcusable conduct on Biden's part. He doesn't want to give RFK Jr.'s campaign any semblance of legitimacy, so he won't even grant him Secret Service protection, even though Kennedy has received death threats, even though an armed man was arrested at one of his rallies a few months ago, and even though an intruder was caught trying to break into his home.
rfk's "campaign" has no legitimacy. it is yet another repub "dirty trick."
 
rfk's "campaign" has no legitimacy. it is yet another repub "dirty trick."
You guys did not officially thank Ross Perot in 1992 and 1996. Many now think that was a dirty trick. RFK is a left-wing politician. Just not as far left as Joe's handlers. The ones we do not see.
 
What a blind, rabid partisan you must be. FYI, RFK Jr. is polling in double digits in many states, according to many polls (LINK).
and those poll respondents will be voting for trump, not rfk, no matter what biden does. hate to lose them, but they need to listen to the guy and look at who he is on stage with : bannon, stone, and the pillow guy.
 
you first. i'm sure dear leader has a small flaw or 2?
Of course. A big one. His continued support of the jab. Might cost him the election.

Now back to your issues - What didn't you like about Biden and the Thomas confirmation?

Which bankruptcy bill are you talking about? The one he supported in 2005 that stripped student loan holders of bankruptcy protection or the Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment and Technical Corrections Act he signed in 2022?

Explain where this ongoing insurrection and violent armed insurgents roaming around is happening. We are all alarmed by the news.

By saying "unable to establish order on the border", are you saying you want him to stop illegal border crossings? If so, then we agree.

I will assume, by their omission from your list, that you are good with his foreign policy, economic policy, and his use of federal agencies for things like censor and intimidation.
 
That's just petty, mean, spiteful, and inexcusable conduct on Biden's part. He doesn't want to give RFK Jr.'s campaign any semblance of legitimacy, so he won't even grant him Secret Service protection, even though Kennedy has received death threats, even though an armed man was arrested at one of his rallies a few months ago, and even though an intruder was caught trying to break into his home.
He is a mean, spiteful asshole. Totally on brand.
 
Of course. A big one. His continued support of the jab. Might cost him the election.

Now back to your issues - What didn't you like about Biden and the Thomas confirmation?

Which bankruptcy bill are you talking about? The one he supported in 2005 that stripped student loan holders of bankruptcy protection or the Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment and Technical Corrections Act he signed in 2022?

Explain where this ongoing insurrection and violent armed insurgents roaming around is happening. We are all alarmed by the news.

By saying "unable to establish order on the border", are you saying you want him to stop illegal border crossings? If so, then we agree.

I will assume, by their omission from your list, that you are good with his foreign policy, economic policy, and his use of federal agencies for things like censor and intimidation.
i am referring to the 2005 bill. the one that protects the too big to fail lenders, and reduces protections for consumers. just in time for a great recession.

i have not been censored or intimidated. neither have you. wouldn't the most flacid commie dictator enforce a gag order?
 
and those poll respondents will be voting for trump, not rfk, no matter what biden does. hate to lose them, but they need to listen to the guy and look at who he is on stage with : bannon, stone, and the pillow guy.
Your extreme partisan spin on those polls has nothing to do with the fact that Biden is acting in a petty, dishonorable manner by not authorizing Secret Service protection for RFK Jr.

FYI, the majority of RFK Jr.'s donations are coming from people who did not donate to presidential campaigns in 2016 or 2020.

Has it occurred to you that maybe, just maybe, much of Kennedy's support is coming from people who are fed up with Trump and Biden and their parties?
 
Your extreme partisan spin on those polls has nothing to do with the fact that Biden is acting in a petty, dishonorable manner by not authorizing Secret Service protection for RFK Jr.

FYI, the majority of RFK Jr.'s donations are coming from people who did not donate to presidential campaigns in 2016 or 2020.

Has it occurred to you that maybe, just maybe, much of Kennedy's support is coming from people who are fed up with Trump and Biden and their parties?
as am i. rfk is not making a case it should be him.
 
What an A-hole Biden is. RFK Jr. has already had his house broken into by an intruder. There's no doubt that Biden wants RFK Jr. eliminated because the recent polls show him pulling 17% of the vote away from him in swing states. If I remember correctly, when Obama ran Bush gave him Secret Service protection within 3 months. RFK Jr. deserves it. There's no doubt another Sirhan Sirhan is out there wanting to bump off another Kennedy.


Obama/Biden are Satanic
 
as am i. rfk is not making a case it should be him.
But any third-party candidate who is polling in double-digits in many states and who has been threatened should be given Secret Service protection. Even if his polling numbers were much lower, he would still deserve such protection. Biden's refusal to grant it is petty and inexcusable.
 
But any third-party candidate who is polling in double-digits in many states and who has been threatened should be given Secret Service protection. Even if his polling numbers were much lower, he would still deserve such protection. Biden's refusal to grant it is petty and inexcusable.
should be protected and funded for protection by congress are not the same.

i wouldn't want biden to become as arrogant as his predecessor, you?
 
President Biden has no say in which candidates get SS protection.

Secret Service protection has been extended to candidates for president — and not just presidents themselves — since a law was enacted in 1968, following the assassination of Kennedy’s father during his presidential campaign. According to Secret Service guidance published for the 2020 election, “major presidential and vice presidential candidates” are “eligible” for protection.

But the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security has wide latitude to decide who qualifies and why, after consultation with an advisory committee. The committee is comprised of high-level members of the government including the speaker of the House, the House minority leader, the Senate majority leader, the Senate minority leader and one additional member chosen by the committee.

from: How the government decides when (and which) presidential candidates get Secret Service
 
President Biden has no say in which candidates get SS protection.

Secret Service protection has been extended to candidates for president — and not just presidents themselves — since a law was enacted in 1968, following the assassination of Kennedy’s father during his presidential campaign. According to Secret Service guidance published for the 2020 election, “major presidential and vice presidential candidates” are “eligible” for protection.

But the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security has wide latitude to decide who qualifies and why, after consultation with an advisory committee. The committee is comprised of high-level members of the government including the speaker of the House, the House minority leader, the Senate majority leader, the Senate minority leader and one additional member chosen by the committee.

from: How the government decides when (and which) presidential candidates get Secret Service
a little more complicated than i thought, but still, not something that can be just given. and to a democrat? next every wacky vanity candidate the repubs have will be suing because they did not have secret service chauffeurs and the rest of the perks that a dekocrat got.l
 
Why should he get SS protection? Should every single person who flies to run for POTUS get SS protection?
Sure. . . if they are polling above 5%

RFK Jr. gets zero protection from secret service as panel approves officers for Nikki Haley: Rising​


RFK Jr. Gets ZERO PROTECTION From Secret Service as Panel APPROVES Officers For Nikki Haley: Rising​




RFK Jr. decries 'double standards' after panel votes to approve Secret Service for Nikki Haley Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas personally denied Kennedy's request for protection.

 
Sure. . . if they are polling above 5%

RFK Jr. gets zero protection from secret service as panel approves officers for Nikki Haley: Rising​


RFK Jr. Gets ZERO PROTECTION From Secret Service as Panel APPROVES Officers For Nikki Haley: Rising​




RFK Jr. decries 'double standards' after panel votes to approve Secret Service for Nikki Haley Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas personally denied Kennedy's request for protection.


haley, who opposes trump, probably needs the protection more than his dem running god does.
 

Forum List

Back
Top