Biden calls Republicans "semi" fascist

[Red Front]

To be precise, it's the idea of making America great that they call fascist. Not really fascist, but something really really bad. Making America Great Again is something they will fight to the death to stop.

Now do you understand why they hate us and Trump so much?

You can't make America Great, if you fail to invest heavily in infrastructure and in its working class.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Communism is the future, it's coming to a theater near you.

It's never worked...so no you brain dead, flamer

 

[Donald H]

Communism is the future, it's coming to a theater near you.

At the least, more socially acceptable government would rise out of the defeat of fascism.

But has fascism ever been defeated and stopped in it's tracks when it has achieved a foothold equivalent of what Trump has already achieved?

Are there countries recorded in history in which the prospective dictator was stopped by a bullet?

 

[struth]

Plantation owners were capitalist. The Slaves were not only inexpensive labor, but after the international slave trade was banned by Congress, Slaves, and their babies, became more of a commodity and a profit center for the Plantations, not really part of Southern society.

no they were not capitalist. Adam Smith discussed this at length, slavery runs counter to capitalism.

A capitalist wants to maximize profits, you don’t do that with a unhappy workforce.

slavery is a leftist concept, slaves work for the plantation or state, have no ownership and work solely for the good of the collective..state/plantation.

that why the dems were confederates ans the south was dominated by dems for much of the 19th and 20th century

this too is why we see the modern dem party attempting to created more and more dependent people, and attacks the working class wirh massive inflation, interest rates, and taxes

 

[struth]

We're moving towards techno-feudalism, if we fail to socialize and democratize production ASAP.

why would you want to take away an individuals ability to own the means of production and give it to the state? that will take away why democracy is in product, because people would not longer be able to vote with their pocket books, and instead be forced to take whatever the state produces for them

 

[Red Front]

At the least, more socially acceptable government would rise out of the defeat of fascism.

But has fascism ever been defeated and stopped in it's tracks when it has achieved a foothold equivalent of what Trump has already achieved?

Are there countries recorded in history in which the prospective dictator was stopped by a bullet?

Advanced technology will lead to massive unemployment due to the loss of wage labor, and that will force society to adopt a socialized and more democratized system of production, not based on profits or market share.

 

[Donald H]

Capitalism obviously can’t completely destroy it, individuals are still going to have their own opinions…but as we have seen in this country it’s the greatest vehicle to over come it

and yes capitalism has been overtake by coups…we have seen tyrantical leftist regime destroy nations by taking over…and we are seeing that today here…that’s why 75 percent of the population sees the current regime taking us in the wrong direction

You could be just attempting to enhance the fear of communism in the minds of the people.

There's no other rational reason why you continue to lead the topic away from the fascism that's Trump's goal.

 

[Donald H]

Advanced technology will lead to massive unemployment due to the loss of wage labor, and that will force society to adopt a socialized and more democratized system of production, not based on profits or market share.

Yes, I know but the lack of employment opportunity is still on the horizon. The immediate solution is imagined as fascism in America. Socialism is pretty obviously the only way forward in the 21st. century. Some can even imagine 'communism' due to China's huge success with a modified style of communism.

We can't move on to 'socially responsible' government right now. That's as unlikely in America as it was in Germany during Hitler's rise to power.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

You could be just attempting to enhance the fear of communism in the minds of the people.

There's no other rational reason why you continue to lead the topic away from the fascism that's Trump's goal.

Good grief, you're fcking batshit, dude

 

[Red Front]

why would you want to take away an individuals ability to own the means of production and give it to the state? that will take away why democracy is in product, because people would not longer be able to vote with their pocket books, and instead be forced to take whatever the state produces for them

A socialist state is an initial tool used by communists to reach communism, which is a stateless society, without socioeconomic classes or the need for money. Socialism is the process that leads to communism. Marx called the socialist state "the dictatorship of the proletariat". That "dictatorship" serves the interests of the working class, and can be democratic. The central planning of the economy is always in cooperation with worker-cooperatives of each industry and that interaction and relationship between the state's central planning department and the democratically run worker-cooperatives of each industry, produces everything we need. Today thanks to advanced technology, we will have an even better socialism than we did in the last century.

Ever heard of "product obsolescence"? Google it. There's a lot of that in capitalism. The individual consumer doesn't have much influence over the market unless he or she boycotts a company with thousands, maybe millions of other consumers. That's very difficult and most working-class people don't have the time or resources to become political or economic activists. Advanced technology will give us two options:

MODERN FEUDALISM VS MODERN SOCIALISM

I'll go with socialism. ​

 

[EvilCat Breath]

At the least, more socially acceptable government would rise out of the defeat of fascism.

But has fascism ever been defeated and stopped in it's tracks when it has achieved a foothold equivalent of what Trump has already achieved?

Are there countries recorded in history in which the prospective dictator was stopped by a bullet?

This is what I like to hear. Is it acceptable to stop a fascist dictator with a bullet? Would you mind the democrat dictator stopped with a bullet? That's what we are boiling toward and I could not be happier about it.

 

[Red Front]

Yes, I know but the lack of employment opportunity is still on the horizon. The immediate solution is imagined as fascism in America. Socialism is pretty obviously the only way forward in the 21st. century. Some can even imagine 'communism' due to China's huge success with a modified style of communism.

We can't move on to 'socially responsible' government right now. That's as unlikely in America as it was in Germany during Hitler's rise to power.

China is a bad joke when it comes to its "communism". Horrible example. I consider the US and Western Europe more "socialist" than China. I say this as an anti-imperialist. I have no love for Western imperialism and I'm against all of the saber-rattling and dragon poking by the United States but nonetheless, I admit China is far from Marxism. I like the DPRK much more than China. I love the DPRK/"North Korea". If the sanctions were lifted it would flourish and become more democratic.

 

[struth]

A socialist state is an initial tool used by communists to reach communism, which is a stateless society, without socioeconomic classes or the need for money. Socialism is the process that leads to communism. Marx called the socialist state "the dictatorship of the proletariat". That "dictatorship" serves the interests of the working class, and can be democratic. The central planning of the economy is always in cooperation with worker-cooperatives of each industry and that interaction and relationship between the state's central planning department and the democratically run worker-cooperatives of each industry, produces everything we need. Today thanks to advanced technology, we will have an even better socialism than we did in the last century.

Ever heard of "product obsolescence"? Google it. There's a lot of that in capitalism. The individual consumer doesn't have much influence over the market unless he or she boycotts a company with thousands, maybe millions of other consumers. That's very difficult and most working-class people don't have the time or resources to become political or economic activists. Advanced technology will give us two options:

MODERN FEUDALISM VS MODERN SOCIALISM

I'll go with socialism. ​

communism never happens because the tyrants don’t give up their power when they have socialism

 

[struth]

China is a bad joke when it comes to its "communism". Horrible example. I consider the US and Western Europe more "socialist" than China. I say this as an anti-imperialist. I have no love for Western imperialism and I'm against all of the saber-rattling and dragon poking by the United States but nonetheless, I admit China is far from Marxism.

how is the US more socialist then China?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

how is the US more socialist then China?

You're dealing with a whack job

 

[BlindBoo]

That's valid to serve to strengthen the argument on why fascism is being so widely accepted. It's conducive to racism.

I don't think so. Most of the flock don't realize what they are being sold.

 

[Magnus]

Biden is once again campaigning with lies and hate mongering and fear mongering
He is calling the Republicans "semi" fascist and a threat to our "democracy"
Fascists do things like using the FBI as their political weapon.
Fascists do things like using hate and fear as their campaign tools.
Fascists do things like using race, religion and region to divide people
Fascists do things like relentlessly lying and using propaganda and censorship.
Fascists do things like using violence as a campaign tool like the Democrats do.
Biden is wrong once again and he is lying once again.
It's the Dems who are the true fascists.

Biden slams Republican platform as ‘semi-fascism’ at campaign rally

In his first campaign-style event, President Biden on Thursday made the argument to vote for Democrats by slamming the Republican platform as “semi-fascism.”

www.washingtontimes.com

MSN

Biden gets fiery in speech, accuses GOP of turning to 'semi-fascism'

President Biden accused Republicans of turning toward 'semi-fascism' during a speech Thursday evening. The Washington Post's Matt Viser joins Morning Joe to discuss.

news.yahoo.com

How dare Biden say that? They are "full" fascists

 

[BlindBoo]

no they were not capitalist. Adam Smith discussed this at length, slavery runs counter to capitalism.

A capitalist wants to maximize profits, you don’t do that with a unhappy workforce.

slavery is a leftist concept, slaves work for the plantation or state, have no ownership and work solely for the good of the collective..state/plantation.

that why the dems were confederates ans the south was dominated by dems for much of the 19th and 20th century

this too is why we see the modern dem party attempting to created more and more dependent people, and attacks the working class wirh massive inflation, interest rates, and taxes

Slaves were capital.

Slavery in the new world evolved from the slavery practiced in Europe since at least Roman times and has been part of the human condition since there has been a human condition.

Your poli-spin is stupid.

 

[struth]

Slaves were capital.

Slavery in the new world evolved from the slavery practiced in Europe since at least Roman times and has been part of the human condition since there has been a human condition.

Your poli-spin is stupid.

ok, so do you know the difference between capital and capitalism? apparently not

there was capital in a monarchy, there is capitalism in socialism, there is capital in fascism

capital isn’t capitalism they mean two different things


gosh you aren’t bright

 

[Red Front]

communism never happens because the tyrants don’t give up their power when they have socialism

Genuine communism occurs when the individual consumer has complete control over the means of production:

​

That is decades, maybe even a century away. Atomic precision manufacturing machines will allow consumers to produce everything they consume without anyone else's help or input. People will become fully independent and the state will become superfluous. Human relationships will be 100% voluntary. Land or being in one place long-term, will be seen as a burden because you carry with you all of the technology that produces everything hence no need to remain in one place unless you want to. You become a spacefarer with your family, or seafarer, or an earthfarer/landfarer, living and traveling on a ship or giant RV. Don't like the authoritarian nature of the leaders of your community? Leave, big deal. Now it's difficult to "leave" and relocate, but in the future, people will just leave and go somewhere else. They'll start a new colony or community somewhere else, maybe in an asteroid, near Pluto.

Socialism is now like a flower growing in a field of weeds that want to strangle it. Capitalism didn't replace chattel slavery and feudalism overnight, it took centuries. Socialism won't replace capitalism in one single swoop or revolution, it will take some time. We're now getting very close to the material conditions that are ripe for socialism. Advanced technology will eliminate wage labor and that's essentially the end of capitalism and the beginning of the socialist age.