Biden and the DNC were targeting "radical, traditional, Catholics"

[Votto]

Russia gate is a lot of things to a lot of people.

Undoubtedly some people said things that were knowingly false.

So, you refuse to answer the question. Understood.

You don't want to say either way because you desperately want it to remain as truth but know it is a lie, much like how the FBI operated.

The FBI knew RussiaGate was a lie — but hid that truth

Evidence revealed by special counsel John Durham proves it beyond dispute.

nypost.com

The FBI knew the Trump-Russia collusion narrative was utter bunk even as it suggested otherwise to Congress, the courts and the public early in 2017. Evidence revealed by special counsel John Durham proves it beyond dispute.

At RealClearInvestigations, Paul Sperry lays out the case.

Declassified for Durham’s probe, a March 2017 memo prepared by Lisa Page for FBI head James Comey’s meeting with Congress’ “Gang of Eight” — the bipartisan House and Senate leaders who oversee the most classified stuff — was a total cook-up job.

It advised Comey to present accusations that Trump’s campaign chair Paul Manafort and foreign policy adviser Carter Page were working with the Russian government as coming from a confidential Russia-based source with real intel-community chops. In fact, the FBI had already established that the root source was US-based former Brookings flunky Igor Danchenko’s utterly speculative gossip with an ex-girlfriend and a Democratic Party hack.


That, plus publicly reported info, was all Christopher Steele (a retired British spy who doesn’t even speak Russian) ever had to back up his “dossier.” And the FBI knew it since at least January 2017, when it interviewed Danchenko.

Comey hid all this during his meetings, and after. Yet the public only learned it years later, once the Durham probe began.

The Comey meeting where he served up these nonsense stories prompted both House and Senate Intelligence committees to open probes. But that was hardly the only poisoned fruit.

FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, counterintelligence officer Peter Strzok, analyst Brian Auten and Justice attorney Kevin Clinesmith pretended the Danchenko “intel” was credible to get the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance court’s OK for wiretaps on Carter Page and dupe the Justice Department to keep granting approval for Trump campaign surveillance (which did not corroborate the wild claims). Again, all while they knew Danchenko had admitted it was baseless.


It was a purely political hit job from the start, by top members of the highest law- enforcement agency in the land, against a candidate-and-then-president they opposed. For all the justified anger at Trump over the Jan. 6 riot, this methodical and effective deception plot looks far more like an attempted coup.

Yet, other than losing their jobs, none of the plotters has paid any real price. Comey and Strzok both wrote best-sellers; McCabe even had his retirement benefits restored (after being fired for lying under oath) under the Biden administration.

Of course, most media have no interest in sharing the truth. They won Pulitzers and endless clicks from hyping Russiagate, using it to kneecap a president they despised.

At this point, it’s up to Durham to keep exposing this unprecedented abuse of power for nakedly personal partisan ends, though Congress may help out once Democrats no longer run it.

Until the plotters are held accountable, there actually is good reason to worry about the future of democracy in America.

 

[Votto]

Russia gate is a lot of things to a lot of people.

Undoubtedly some people said things that were knowingly false.

Lying to Congress, much like keeping known relevant truth hidden from them, is considered perjury.

Comey should be in jail.

Comey should have put away Hillary as Hillary told lie after lie

Again, lying to the FBI is jail worthy as we saw with General Flynn, even though Flynn was told his comments were off the record and it was only one claimed lie.



The FBI has zero credibility now.

Deal with it.

 

[Marener]

So, you refuse to answer the question. Understood.

You don't want to say either way because you desperately want it to remain as truth but know it is a lie, much like how the FBI operated.

The FBI knew RussiaGate was a lie — but hid that truth

Evidence revealed by special counsel John Durham proves it beyond dispute.

nypost.com

The FBI knew the Trump-Russia collusion narrative was utter bunk even as it suggested otherwise to Congress, the courts and the public early in 2017. Evidence revealed by special counsel John Durham proves it beyond dispute.

At RealClearInvestigations, Paul Sperry lays out the case.

Declassified for Durham’s probe, a March 2017 memo prepared by Lisa Page for FBI head James Comey’s meeting with Congress’ “Gang of Eight” — the bipartisan House and Senate leaders who oversee the most classified stuff — was a total cook-up job.

It advised Comey to present accusations that Trump’s campaign chair Paul Manafort and foreign policy adviser Carter Page were working with the Russian government as coming from a confidential Russia-based source with real intel-community chops. In fact, the FBI had already established that the root source was US-based former Brookings flunky Igor Danchenko’s utterly speculative gossip with an ex-girlfriend and a Democratic Party hack.


That, plus publicly reported info, was all Christopher Steele (a retired British spy who doesn’t even speak Russian) ever had to back up his “dossier.” And the FBI knew it since at least January 2017, when it interviewed Danchenko.

Comey hid all this during his meetings, and after. Yet the public only learned it years later, once the Durham probe began.

The Comey meeting where he served up these nonsense stories prompted both House and Senate Intelligence committees to open probes. But that was hardly the only poisoned fruit.

FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, counterintelligence officer Peter Strzok, analyst Brian Auten and Justice attorney Kevin Clinesmith pretended the Danchenko “intel” was credible to get the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance court’s OK for wiretaps on Carter Page and dupe the Justice Department to keep granting approval for Trump campaign surveillance (which did not corroborate the wild claims). Again, all while they knew Danchenko had admitted it was baseless.


It was a purely political hit job from the start, by top members of the highest law- enforcement agency in the land, against a candidate-and-then-president they opposed. For all the justified anger at Trump over the Jan. 6 riot, this methodical and effective deception plot looks far more like an attempted coup.

Yet, other than losing their jobs, none of the plotters has paid any real price. Comey and Strzok both wrote best-sellers; McCabe even had his retirement benefits restored (after being fired for lying under oath) under the Biden administration.

Of course, most media have no interest in sharing the truth. They won Pulitzers and endless clicks from hyping Russiagate, using it to kneecap a president they despised.

At this point, it’s up to Durham to keep exposing this unprecedented abuse of power for nakedly personal partisan ends, though Congress may help out once Democrats no longer run it.

Until the plotters are held accountable, there actually is good reason to worry about the future of democracy in America.

Durham is full of shit. He took two people to court to accuse them of lying to the FBI and completely failed.

Even Durham’s own report acknowledges that the emails they hacked out of Russian intelligence were probably fabrications.

The idea the FBI was acting politically in investigating the campaign is a hoax.

 

[Marener]

Lying to Congress, much like keeping known relevant truth hidden from them, is considered perjury.

Comey should be in jail.

Why should Comey be in jail? Did he lie? What lie did he tell?

 

[1srelluc]

LOL....They might have done better to look into that bunch of Mormons with all the cool toys in my AO......But they all vote dem.

 

[Mashmont]

Scandal exposed: The FBI's Catholic witch hunt just got even uglier | Blaze Media

This was one of the most despicable violations of the civil liberties of innocent Americans conducted by the federal government in modern times.

www.theblaze.com

First of all, how can one be radically traditional?



And of course, we all know what this means. This means Catholics who actively oppose abortion on demand, just like the radically traditional SCOTUS overturned Roe vs. Wade, isn't that right democrats?

On July 22, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) released a new interim staff report on former President Joe Biden's Catholic spy ring.

Thanks to FBI Director Kash Patel, some of the information is new. And when pieced together with what we already knew, the picture that emerges is one of an FBI that went off the rails. Christopher Wray, who led the FBI under Biden, bears much of the blame.

The FBI was apparently focused on “radical-traditionalist Catholics.” Who are these people? According to the FBI’s own internal review of this matter, “investigators found that many FBI employees could not even define the meaning of ‘radical-traditionalist Catholic’ when preparing, editing, or reviewing” the Richmond Field Office memorandum that authorized the probe.

In other words, the FBI decided that these Catholics were a problem, even though agents were unable to explain who they are. FBI agents were convinced that the so-called rad-trads were “linked” to "racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists."

Now where the "violent" part of all this fits in would be fascinating?

Anyone here threatened by violent radically traditional Catholics?

It is just one more example of how the DNC has gone off the rails into some sort of PC fascistic abyss of moral rot as they weaponize government against law abiding citizens and ignore the crime on the street all around you.

He considered himself a traditional catholic. Have you thanked the FBI for arresting a radical violent individual and saving lives?

Infiltrating the Far Right

The threat from domestic terrorism is rising, but, with Republicans decrying the “deep state,” the F.B.I. is cautious about investigating far-right groups. Vigilantes are leaping into the fray.

www.newyorker.com

Several months after his release, Lopez joined a house of worship belonging to the Society of St. Pius X, a sect that broke away from the Catholic Church in opposition to Vatican II reforms. The Anti-Defamation League, citing the sect’s long history of statements about Jews and Judaism, has called it “mired in antisemitism.” (The society’s Web page denies that it espouses “racial hatred” toward Jews.) On social media, Lopez posted that he was delighted to have found a church that wasn’t “totally kiked.”

The F.B.I. placed an informant in the church, who reported that Lopez was attempting to enlist congregants in violent schemes. That November, Lopez bought a truck, declared online that he planned to use it in an attack, and posted a photograph of a mass shooter. Only then did agents raid his bedroom. They found firearm components, a stockpile of ammunition, and eight Molotov cocktails mixed using a form of napalm. A crucifix and a rosary hung over a Nazi flag on his wall. Lopez pleaded guilty to possession of a destructive device and has been sentenced to eighteen months in prison. In all likelihood, the F.B.I. averted a massacre.

A crazy person can call themselves anything. But no Catholic organization endorses the views of this insane man

 

[Blaster]

Young people are flocking to the Catholic religion.

 

[Donald H]

The FBI knew the Trump-Russia collusion narrative was utter bunk even as it suggested otherwise to Congress, the courts and the public early in 2017. Evidence revealed by special counsel John Durham proves it beyond dispute.

Bth the US and Russia interfere in each other's politics in the interest of promoting the most desirble candidaate. That's a given!

The difference with Trump is that he actively participated in Russia's efforts.

 

[Blaster]

Bth the US and Russia interfere in each other's politics.

The difference with Trump is that he actively participated in Russia's efforts.

Nonsense.

 

[Marener]

A crazy person can call themselves anything. But no Catholic organization endorses the views of this insane man

Many in the catholic church were happy to help the FBI’s investigation. A priest refused to talk with them and that made the FBI suspicious.

 

[Votto]

A crazy person can call themselves anything. But no Catholic organization endorses the views of this insane man

Every self respecting Christian would condemn such behavior, but ironically many democrat Congressmen cannot even bring themselves to condemn 10/7, where women and children were targeted for extermination.

Very telling.

 

[Votto]

Durham is full of shit. He took two people to court to accuse them of lying to the FBI and completely failed.

Even Durham’s own report acknowledges that the emails they hacked out of Russian intelligence were probably fabrications.

The idea the FBI was acting politically in investigating the campaign is a hoax.

The gig is up, the FBI is a joke

Deal with it.

 

[Marener]

The gig is up, the FBI is a joke

Deal with it.

In your mind, maybe but that’s because you believe hoaxes.

The fascist violent catholic was not a hoax. It was a bad dude that the FBI arrested before he could commit acts of violence primarily against Jewish people.

Let’s hear you say that the FBI shouldn’t be trying to prevent antisemitic violence. Go ahead.

 

[Votto]

In your mind, maybe but that’s because you believe hoaxes.

The fascist violent catholic was not a hoax. It was a bad dude that the FBI arrested before he could commit acts of violence primarily against Jewish people.

Let’s hear you say that the FBI shouldn’t be trying to prevent antisemitic violence. Go ahead.

When you start manufacturing and/or helping to hide hoaxes, they all tend to get blurry eyed.

Comey is a proven partisan hack idiot.

 

[Marener]

When you start manufacturing and/or helping to hide hoaxes, they all tend to get blurry eyed.

You guys ******* love hoaxes. What are you talking about?

 

[Independent thinker]

Scandal exposed: The FBI's Catholic witch hunt just got even uglier | Blaze Media

This was one of the most despicable violations of the civil liberties of innocent Americans conducted by the federal government in modern times.

www.theblaze.com

First of all, how can one be radically traditional?



And of course, we all know what this means. This means Catholics who actively oppose abortion on demand, just like the radically traditional SCOTUS overturned Roe vs. Wade, isn't that right democrats?

On July 22, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) released a new interim staff report on former President Joe Biden's Catholic spy ring.

Thanks to FBI Director Kash Patel, some of the information is new. And when pieced together with what we already knew, the picture that emerges is one of an FBI that went off the rails. Christopher Wray, who led the FBI under Biden, bears much of the blame.

The FBI was apparently focused on “radical-traditionalist Catholics.” Who are these people? According to the FBI’s own internal review of this matter, “investigators found that many FBI employees could not even define the meaning of ‘radical-traditionalist Catholic’ when preparing, editing, or reviewing” the Richmond Field Office memorandum that authorized the probe.

In other words, the FBI decided that these Catholics were a problem, even though agents were unable to explain who they are. FBI agents were convinced that the so-called rad-trads were “linked” to "racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists."

Now where the "violent" part of all this fits in would be fascinating?

Anyone here threatened by violent radically traditional Catholics?

It is just one more example of how the DNC has gone off the rails into some sort of PC fascistic abyss of moral rot as they weaponize government against law abiding citizens and ignore the crime on the street all around you.

It's always been funny (not really) that Catholic parents are investigated for being terrorists while we need to seek tolerance and inclusion with radical Islamists.