Biden administration pressured Amazon to ban books.

[Nostra]

Book banning? Where have we seen that before? Oh yea, Nazi Germany.

Someone needs to educate this administration on the First Amendment.

Biden Admin Pressured Amazon to Suppress Books It Didn’t Like​

“Is the [Biden] Admin asking us to remove books”?​

What’s the difference between books and any other kind of speech? Books have an emotional quality to them.

Delete someone’s post and it can be called enforcing community guidelines, but burn a book and suddenly you’re a Nazi. Speech is still speech, but the idea of going after books in particular summons all sorts of historical references from the Muslim destruction of the Library of Alexandria to book-burning rallies in Berlin.

It’s why the Left was able to mobilize so much opposition by accusing school boards and parents of trying to “ban books” by keeping pornographic books out of schools.

Still every prior form of political censorship was defended by leftists, why not go after books on Amazon?

Tyler O’Neil at the Daily Signal reports that the Biden team saw no apparent difference between targeting books on Amazon and any other forms of social media censorship that it was pushing.

Andrew Slavitt, then a senior adviser on Biden’s COVID-19 response team, had previously asked, “Who can we talk to about the high levels of propaganda and misinformation and disinformation [on] Amazon?”

And by “talk to”, they meant get rid of.

In one email produced through a House Judiciary Committee subopena had an Amazon employee asking, “Is the [Biden] Admin asking us to remove books”?
After the March 9 meeting at the White House, Amazon staff strategized how to respond to a negative story that Buzzfeed would publish discussing “COVID-19 related books for sale on Amazon.” Staff noted that they were “feeling pressure from the White House Taskforce” on the issue of books “related to vaccine misinformation.”

The resulting compromise instead settled for shadowbanning the books.

In this discussion, a staffer noted that “we did enable Do Not Promote for anti-vax books whose primary purpose is to persuade readers vaccines are unsafe or ineffective on 3/9, and will review additional handling options for these books with you, [redacted], and [redacted] on 3/19.”
That March 9 decision to change Amazon’s algorithm to avoid promoting “anti-vax books” appears to have happened after the meeting with White House staff.

Biden Admin Pressured Amazon to Suppress Books It Didn't Like | Frontpage Mag

“Is the [Biden] Admin asking us to remove books”?

www.frontpagemag.com

 

[Votto]

Book banning? Where have we seen that before? Oh yea, Nazi Germany.

Someone needs to educate this administration on the First Amendment.

Biden Admin Pressured Amazon to Suppress Books It Didn’t Like​

“Is the [Biden] Admin asking us to remove books”?​

What’s the difference between books and any other kind of speech? Books have an emotional quality to them.

Delete someone’s post and it can be called enforcing community guidelines, but burn a book and suddenly you’re a Nazi. Speech is still speech, but the idea of going after books in particular summons all sorts of historical references from the Muslim destruction of the Library of Alexandria to book-burning rallies in Berlin.

It’s why the Left was able to mobilize so much opposition by accusing school boards and parents of trying to “ban books” by keeping pornographic books out of schools.

Still every prior form of political censorship was defended by leftists, why not go after books on Amazon?

Tyler O’Neil at the Daily Signal reports that the Biden team saw no apparent difference between targeting books on Amazon and any other forms of social media censorship that it was pushing.


And by “talk to”, they meant get rid of.


The resulting compromise instead settled for shadowbanning the books.

Biden Admin Pressured Amazon to Suppress Books It Didn't Like | Frontpage Mag

“Is the [Biden] Admin asking us to remove books”?

www.frontpagemag.com

Yea, but MAGA bans porn for kids in schools. and genital mutilation.

Just helping the Left with their talking points.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Yea, but MAGA bans porn for kids in schools. and genital mutilation.

Just helping the Left with their talking points.

Republicans want to ban books from elementary school libraries that detail oral sex and tell little kids they can be girls if they were born boys.

Liberals want to ban books from adults that go against their Covid 19 narrative.

Apples to lugnuts comparison. I agree.

 

[Votto]

Republicans want to ban books from elementary school libraries that detail oral sex and tell little kids they can be girls if they were born boys.

Liberals want to ban books that go against their Covid 19 narrative.

Apples to lugnuts comparison.

But how on earth are toddlers expected to have safe sex without such instruction?

Think man!!!

 

[Independent thinker]

Book banning? Where have we seen that before? Oh yea, Nazi Germany.

Someone needs to educate this administration on the First Amendment.

Biden Admin Pressured Amazon to Suppress Books It Didn’t Like​

“Is the [Biden] Admin asking us to remove books”?​

What’s the difference between books and any other kind of speech? Books have an emotional quality to them.

Delete someone’s post and it can be called enforcing community guidelines, but burn a book and suddenly you’re a Nazi. Speech is still speech, but the idea of going after books in particular summons all sorts of historical references from the Muslim destruction of the Library of Alexandria to book-burning rallies in Berlin.

It’s why the Left was able to mobilize so much opposition by accusing school boards and parents of trying to “ban books” by keeping pornographic books out of schools.

Still every prior form of political censorship was defended by leftists, why not go after books on Amazon?

Tyler O’Neil at the Daily Signal reports that the Biden team saw no apparent difference between targeting books on Amazon and any other forms of social media censorship that it was pushing.


And by “talk to”, they meant get rid of.


The resulting compromise instead settled for shadowbanning the books.

Biden Admin Pressured Amazon to Suppress Books It Didn't Like | Frontpage Mag

“Is the [Biden] Admin asking us to remove books”?

www.frontpagemag.com

And here I thought it was Republicans banning books according to the left.

 

[Augustine_]

Book banning? Where have we seen that before? Oh yea, Nazi Germany.

Someone needs to educate this administration on the First Amendment.

Biden Admin Pressured Amazon to Suppress Books It Didn’t Like​

“Is the [Biden] Admin asking us to remove books”?​

What’s the difference between books and any other kind of speech? Books have an emotional quality to them.

Delete someone’s post and it can be called enforcing community guidelines, but burn a book and suddenly you’re a Nazi. Speech is still speech, but the idea of going after books in particular summons all sorts of historical references from the Muslim destruction of the Library of Alexandria to book-burning rallies in Berlin.

It’s why the Left was able to mobilize so much opposition by accusing school boards and parents of trying to “ban books” by keeping pornographic books out of schools.

Still every prior form of political censorship was defended by leftists, why not go after books on Amazon?

Tyler O’Neil at the Daily Signal reports that the Biden team saw no apparent difference between targeting books on Amazon and any other forms of social media censorship that it was pushing.


And by “talk to”, they meant get rid of.


The resulting compromise instead settled for shadowbanning the books.

Biden Admin Pressured Amazon to Suppress Books It Didn't Like | Frontpage Mag

“Is the [Biden] Admin asking us to remove books”?

www.frontpagemag.com

Lol that is some quality fake ass news, snowflake

 

[Nostra]

Lol that is some quality fake ass news, snowflake

I note you have nothing to dispute the facts in the OP.

Dismissed, Simp.

 

[Augustine_]

I note you have nothing to dispute the facts in the OP.

Dismissed, Simp.

You forgot to include any facts in the OP, tiny flake

 

[Nostra]

You forgot to include any facts in the OP, tiny flake

Still nothing. Try harder, Troll.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Book banning? Where have we seen that before? Oh yea, Nazi Germany.

Someone needs to educate this administration on the First Amendment.

Biden Admin Pressured Amazon to Suppress Books It Didn’t Like​

“Is the [Biden] Admin asking us to remove books”?​

What’s the difference between books and any other kind of speech? Books have an emotional quality to them.

Delete someone’s post and it can be called enforcing community guidelines, but burn a book and suddenly you’re a Nazi. Speech is still speech, but the idea of going after books in particular summons all sorts of historical references from the Muslim destruction of the Library of Alexandria to book-burning rallies in Berlin.

It’s why the Left was able to mobilize so much opposition by accusing school boards and parents of trying to “ban books” by keeping pornographic books out of schools.

Still every prior form of political censorship was defended by leftists, why not go after books on Amazon?

Tyler O’Neil at the Daily Signal reports that the Biden team saw no apparent difference between targeting books on Amazon and any other forms of social media censorship that it was pushing.


And by “talk to”, they meant get rid of.


The resulting compromise instead settled for shadowbanning the books.

Biden Admin Pressured Amazon to Suppress Books It Didn't Like | Frontpage Mag

“Is the [Biden] Admin asking us to remove books”?

www.frontpagemag.com

Hearsay and conjecture.

 

[Nostra]

Hearsay and conjecture.

Huh? These were the people being contacted by Tater's administration, Stupid.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Huh? These were the people being contacted by Tater's administration, Stupid.

Who is the staffer? Is this an out of court statement?

"In this discussion, a staffer noted that “we did enable Do Not Promote for anti-vax books whose primary purpose is to persuade readers vaccines are unsafe or ineffective on 3/9, and will review additional handling options for these books with you, [redacted], and [redacted] on 3/19.”

Who said this? Is it an out of court statement.

“Is the [Biden] Admin asking us to remove books”?

This is conjecture.

And by “talk to”, they meant get rid of.

This is conjecture.

"It’s why the Left was able to mobilize so much opposition by accusing school boards and parents of trying to “ban books” by keeping pornographic books out of schools."

Add to that a complete lack of context on quoted statements and what you have here amounts to nothing but propaganda.