Biblical truth has been branded as hate

Only those who thought grabbing women by the ***** was immoral.
I think people who falsely scream “fascist!!” and “racist!!” on a murdered man’s grave are immoral.
 
He said they allowed it. That’s consent.
He said he didn't even have to ask. That's without consent.

I suppose YHWH allows that, it seems to allow most patriarchal behaviour.
 
Then maybe they shouldn't shove them in everyone's faces in public. :dunno:
They don't need to do that for evangenitals to obsess over their private parts.

See, you're doing it now.
 
We should be able to use our religious beliefs as well since they are part of what establishes morality. No one is forced to worship anything, in any way, which is what a theocracy does.
The morality that leads to the bombing of imaginary nuclear weapons?
 
I think people who falsely scream “fascist!!” and “racist!!” on a murdered man’s grave are immoral.
I think Kirk was a racist hate monger. Perhaps Satan can do something with him while he's there. A bit of sensitivity training maybe.
If Satan can even be persuaded to take him in.
 
Last edited:

This why Charlie had to die

I’ve seen unbelievers circulate memes and half-quotes trying to paint him as harsh or hateful. But when you look at the full conversations, the truth is clear: Charlie’s goal wasn’t to win arguments at all costs — it was to point people back to God’s word.

That’s the real lesson for us. The world will twist, clip, and distort, but what matters is faithfulness before the Lord.
"We’ve reached a point in culture where entire sections of scripture are now considered “hate speech.” If you affirm God’s design for marriage, gender, or life in the womb, you risk being censored, mocked, or even punished."


The Left can't wait to outlaw "hate speech" and then define what exactly that entails.

I dare say that had Charley gone to Europe or even Canada, or anywhere else on this planet other than the United States of America, he would have been jailed for hate speech, or worse.

Explain:


 
He said he didn't even have to ask. That's without consent.

I suppose YHWH allows that, it seems to allow most patriarchal behaviour.
He said “they let you.” That’s consent.

And what about what Biden did? And what Obama did? I noticed you skipped right over real sexual assault.
 
I think Kirk was a racist hate monger. Perhaps Satan can do something with him while he's there. A bit of sensitivity training maybe.
If Satan can even be persuaded to take him in.
What did he ever say that was racist, other than he’s for merit-based hiring and admissions?

Maybe YOU need a bit of sensitivity training. Decent people don’t go around demonizing murder victims.
 
Anything that comes from the stone age and promotes tribalism and hatred of people as the bible clearly does is hate. Hate is defined by the reality that going back to such concepts is destructive to our society and will hurt people. People that are doing nothing besides living their lives.

Such will hurt gays
Such will hurt trans
Such will hurt People of color
Such will hurt people that have a different view or belief system

Such is very stone age and should be labeled as hate. Frankly I say you hate because your ideals will end up killing or hurting people that do nothing wrong besides live differently then your pointless book.
 

This why Charlie had to die

I’ve seen unbelievers circulate memes and half-quotes trying to paint him as harsh or hateful. But when you look at the full conversations, the truth is clear: Charlie’s goal wasn’t to win arguments at all costs — it was to point people back to God’s word.

That’s the real lesson for us. The world will twist, clip, and distort, but what matters is faithfulness before the Lord.
"We’ve reached a point in culture where entire sections of scripture are now considered “hate speech.” If you affirm God’s design for marriage, gender, or life in the womb, you risk being censored, mocked, or even punished."


The Left can't wait to outlaw "hate speech" and then define what exactly that entails.

I dare say that had Charley gone to Europe or even Canada, or anywhere else on this planet other than the United States of America, he would have been jailed for hate speech, or worse.

It is not truth. Just fairy tales.

putin .15 ut.gif
 
Anything that comes from the stone age and promotes tribalism and hatred of people as the bible clearly does is hate.
You present a current narrative based on bibliolatry that has been passed down now for almost three millenia.
The problem: Christians today must believe the Bible as a whole, is the "Infallible Word of God", therefore, everything between Genesis and Revelation must be true, correct and adhered.

This narrative removes all critical thought around "The Bible".

First, the Bible never says of itself that it is the "Word of God", is infallible, perfect, literal representation of God, creation, history, etc. Jesus himself, never claimed that to be a believer of himself that: A Bible is coming that is infallible, perfect, literal representation of God, creation, history, and will define what it means to be a Christian. In fact, Christianity grew, for almost three centuries before the RCC decided that they needed to codified the letters of the NT and then marry them with Jewish scripture, incorrectly.

With the forming of "The Bible" we have then for centuries and centuries tried to understand why the OT god and the NT representation of God through Jesus are two completely different representations. I purpose that the ancient Israelites misappropriated and incorrectly anthropomorphized God by applying attributes, commands, war victories to God that is outside of God's character.

Jesus, if God incarnate, is the true representation of God. I would then purpose that the OT, for Christians, is only of value from a historical perspective and context, and not necessary for the establishment of what is required to be Christian. Once Jesus fulfilled the old covenant, a new covenant was created not between God and Nation, but between God and the individual. Paul explicitly understood this and is evident in his writings to many of the gentile churches.

Therefore, your representation of the God of hate, is usurped by the true representation of God through the crucified God and his Son Jesus Christ. Jesus is love and I would agree that Christians today should express love to their neighbor, regardless of sex, race, anything.

Oh, BTW, all scripture is well after the stone age.
 
15th post
Anything that comes from the stone age and promotes tribalism and hatred of people as the bible clearly does is hate. Hate is defined by the reality that going back to such concepts is destructive to our society and will hurt people. People that are doing nothing besides living their lives.

Such will hurt gays
Such will hurt trans
Such will hurt People of color
Such will hurt people that have a different view or belief system

Such is very stone age and should be labeled as hate. Frankly I say you hate because your ideals will end up killing or hurting people that do nothing wrong besides live differently then your pointless book.
You mean the type of hate that causes leftists to yell “Death to Jews!!”…. and demean Charlie Kirk with lies about “facist!!” that contributed to his murder…. and burn and riot for months on end, killing 30 people….and compare Trump to Hitler?

The hate that emanates from the Left for people who disagree with them is off the charts.
 
Anyone who is trying to inflict their religious beliefs onto everyone else is a theocrat, yes.

This really isn't hard to understand. If you want to.

.
tell us who are the leaders in DC doing what you just claimed .
 
Back
Top Bottom