Bible History

Jesus was a Jew and the Messiah expected by the Jews was an anointed warrior king like David who would vanquish the enemies of the Jews. Jesus didn't fulfill any of those expectations.
He did the best he could----he organized against the money-changers in the Temple Court Yard-----they were Roman shills.
The big enemy at that time was ROME
 
See what I mean. You were mistaken about original sin and humans being sinful. Yet, you continue babbling the untruth.

Since I pointed it out, now you're resorting to your childish whining.
the 1st century religious itinerant was the reaffirmation of liberation theology - from the oppressors, persecutors and victimizers of the innocent - short lived and persecuted till the 4th century when the crucifiers wrote their book to institutionalize their crime of wanton deprivation.
.
they wrote their bible for their and your purpose in mind - those afraid to manage their own way to the Everlasting than accomplishing the feat themselves - and in doing so try and drag everyone else with them to a dark and final conclusion to a withered and depleted spirit.

how many 2nd chances do you deserve, bond.
 
As many stones as Breezewood throws, he must be free from sin.

Which is hard to believe based upon his behaviors on this forum.
.
you imagine stones where there are non rather than defend your false religion ^, same for bond et all then incessantly argue using your unaccredited 4th century bible misconceptions in disregard for recorded history and histories true renderings of the desert religions.
 
The Bible doesn't prove anything. It's like looking at Harry Potter and saying that people in the 20th Century could perform magic.
The Bible isn't a science book, but science backs up the Bible. Nothing backs up Harry Potter and evolution (w/o natural selection). There is no abiogenesis, aliens (life on other planets or space bodies) or life from non-life. It's YOU and the atheists who believe in those the Harry Potter fantasies.
 
The Bible isn't a science book, but science backs up the Bible. Nothing backs up Harry Potter and evolution (w/o natural selection). There is no abiogenesis, aliens (life on other planets or space bodies) or life from non-life. It's YOU and the atheists who believe in those the Harry Potter fantasies.

Where does the Bible back up science?
 
.
you imagine stones where there are non rather than defend your false religion ^, same for bond et all then incessantly argue using your unaccredited 4th century bible misconceptions in disregard for recorded history and histories true renderings of the desert religions.
You are WRONG once more. The Bible has been accredited. As for 4th century, you are wrong in that those were the manuscripts.
 
Where does the Bible back up science?
The most recent that was discussed here was the incredible complexity and replication of DNA. It convinced one famous atheist to change his mind -- Is God Real?.

My turn. What science do atheists have to disprove God?
 
.
you imagine stones where there are non rather than defend your false religion ^, same for bond et all then incessantly argue using your unaccredited 4th century bible misconceptions in disregard for recorded history and histories true renderings of the desert religions.
No. The stones are real. You intentionally make it personal.
 
Go ahead and disprove it:auiqs.jpg:.
That's it? How does science back up walking on water, parting of the Red Sea etc?
Those are miracles. Those parts take faith to believe. Anyway, if you're just going to toss away DNA and such, then you don't know much science. How can I convince an ignorant using science? That's impossible.
 
Here is another example of an ignorant here. He admitted he doesn't know how the universe, Earth and spacetime started. I gave him my theory of how how it started based on the Bible. God created electromagntism and used its powers in the EMS (electromagnetic spectrum). The Bible states God separated the light and dark which started time as 24-hour days and nights. With that creation, we have space, time and all the energy the universe will ever need.
 
One would need FAITH to believe in God or no god/gods.


What does that mean to you?

Its a large collection of writings over time by sometimes anonymous authors. It was redacted and amended under king Omri when he sought to reunite Judah and Israel....

The OT is full of poetry, ancient myths from the Canaanites... borrowed stories from Egypt and Sumer.

Its didactic literature never intended as history.
 
That's it? How does science back up walking on water, parting of the Red Sea etc?
More bashing the Bible and Christianity, eh? The same you do on every religion thread, day in and day out. While calling yourself a Christian. Give it a rest.
 
More bashing the Bible and Christianity, eh? The same you do on every religion thread, day in and day out. While calling yourself a Christian. Give it a rest.

Not bashing Christianity at all. Do you understand the meaning of didactic literature?
 

Forum List

Back
Top