Beto: The Abbott campaign are instructing their supporters not to come to my rallies because we've been finding so much common ground

There is nothing anti-2nd Amendment about wanting gun ownership to be WELL REGULATED.
That’s just your dumbass not knowing what words mean or being able to read a sentence in English.

You’re wrong because of both, but even if your misinterpretation of a common use phrase from the 1700s was somehow correct, it wouldn’t matter due to the sentence structure.
 
There is nothing anti-2nd Amendment about wanting gun ownership to be WELL REGULATED.

It is....literally what the 2A says.

It appears to be those opposed to the actual language who are the REAL "anti-2A- ers.

You know, those that oppose strict regulation on firearms.
But any regulations will not effect criminals. Instead of making it harder for law abiding citizens to exercise their Constitution right make the punishment for using a firearm to commit a crime harsher. The 2nd Amendment also literally states "shall not be infringed".
 
I see Greg Abbott is lying about Beto defunding the police. Abbott is a failure and must be voted OUT. Vote Beto O’Rourke for Governor on November 8...Make Texas Big Again!


Liar. Beto has been hiding out for a month. He either has monkey pox or...

wanking beto.jpg
 
That’s just your dumbass not knowing what words mean or being able to read a sentence in English.

You’re wrong because of both, but even if your misinterpretation of a common use phrase from the 1700s was somehow correct, it wouldn’t matter due to the sentence structure.
Bullshit!
The Second Amendment was written for flintlock and blunderbuss!
It actually has ZERO application to 21st century weaponry.

It wasn't even until 2008 when a few conservative judges deviated from the actual intent of the Constitution and legislated from the bench deciding that the 2A applies to private citizens outside the context of a militia.

So don't confuse what a bunch of conservative justices in 2008 thought for what the framers of the Constitution intended.
 
Bullshit!
The Second Amendment was written for flintlock and blunderbuss!
It actually has ZERO application to 21st century weaponry.

It wasn't even until 2008 when a few conservative judges deviated from the actual intent of the Constitution and legislated from the bench deciding that the 2A applies to private citizens outside the context of a militia.

So don't confuse what a bunch of conservative justices in 2008 thought for what the framers of the Constitution intended.
Fine.

Then the first amendment cannot possibly protect any speech using telegram, telephone, or internet, Luddite moron.
 
Bullshit!
The Second Amendment was written for flintlock and blunderbuss!
It actually has ZERO application to 21st century weaponry.

It wasn't even until 2008 when a few conservative judges deviated from the actual intent of the Constitution and legislated from the bench deciding that the 2A applies to private citizens outside the context of a militia.

So don't confuse what a bunch of conservative justices in 2008 thought for what the framers of the Constitution intended.
Liar 1939 Supreme Court Case established that the 2nd protected military style firearms,
 
Fine.

Then the first amendment cannot possibly protect any speech using telegram, telephone, or internet, Luddite moron.
I didn't realize that anyone has ever been shot with a telephone.
Or that the First Amendment contains any clause specifying that telophone ownership and use must be "well regulated."

Hmmm.....
 
Bullshit!
The Second Amendment was written for flintlock and blunderbuss!
It actually has ZERO application to 21st century weaponry.

It wasn't even until 2008 when a few conservative judges deviated from the actual intent of the Constitution and legislated from the bench deciding that the 2A applies to private citizens outside the context of a militia.

So don't confuse what a bunch of conservative justices in 2008 thought for what the framers of the Constitution intended.


What won't be confused is your illiteracy for reality.

.
 
you did claim that the 2nd didn't apply to modern firearms
I also stated that the 2A provides a very specific set of circumstances, or parameters for gun ownership.

The First A separation of church and state and the free press is not the same as the Second Amendment.

Apples and oranges.
 

Forum List

Back
Top