Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Try the crochet forum, Cherry girl.
Your understanding is nonsense when it comes to October 7.Oh, now "law" and "order" are nonsense words. Okay.![]()
You support mass murder. Pitiful, pitiful.No wonder you think fact is the same as opinion. lol
They are words. And they have meaning. You are using them in a nonsensical manner. Do please explain to me what the difference is between "law" and "order"; what criteria you apply to each; under which circumstance each is relevant; and how all this makes sense in the context of the rights of States.Oh, now "law" and "order" are nonsense words. Okay.![]()
You support mass murder.My understanding of Oct 7? I never even discussed it, Cherry Zafry. Don't you have a pie to bake?
Seriously?! I have to explain the difference between law versus order?They are words. And they have meaning. You are using them in a nonsensical manner. Do please explain to me what the difference is between "law" and "order"; what criteria you apply to each; under which circumstance each is relevant; and how all this makes sense in the context of the rights of States.
Certainly, you do in the context of our discussion, while also noting that "order" has multiple and broad definitions. For example, you seem to be setting the category of "contracts" (treaties, agreements, charters, accords) outside the parameters of "law". You claim that States have no "rights" because the concept of "law" does not apply to States. Defend those positions.Seriously?! I have to explain the difference between law versus order?
Truly, I despair at the lack of intellectual discourse, critical thinking, requirement for evidence, and the inability to express concepts or defend arguments.Hondo does not understand words.
Defend them to who? Someone who doesn't even understand 4th grade basics like fact versus opinion? lolCertainly, you do in the context of our discussion, while also noting that "order" has multiple and broad definitions. For example, you seem to be setting the category of "contracts" (treaties, agreements, charters, accords) outside the parameters of "law". You claim that States have no "rights" because the concept of "law" does not apply to States. Defend those positions.
Lol. You think your perception of an internet vid is fact. But keep up your internet lawyering, shill.Truly, I despair at the lack of intellectual discourse, critical thinking, requirement for evidence, and the inability to express concepts or defend arguments.
You are unable or refuse to articulate what you mean by "order" and how you differentiate it from "law". You might at the least give me the charity of letting me know if you intend the verb or the noun.Defend them to who? Someone who doesn't even understand 4th grade basics like fact versus opinion? lol
You claim you are for the rights of indigenous people, but apparently, only in the abstract. You have no problem enforcing order that trumps law. Defend that.
There's a new invention. It's called a dictionary. If you want to discuss something, then you come knowing basics.You are unable or refuse to articulate what you mean by "order" and how you differentiate it from "law". You might at the least give me the charity of letting me know if you intend the verb or the noun.
And again, please refer back to the original claim, which is that States have no rights in law, but have rights in "order".
Ok, Chess Pigeon Cherry.Shusa is spanked Hondo very hard.

The Palestinian freedom fighters weren't the murderers flying those Apache helicopters that slaughtered a thousand Jews on October 7Do you ignore that the Hams fighters committed a mass murder raid on October 7.