Bernie is on the Senate floor posting pictures of Jeff Bezos' assets and demanding we stop giving him so much damn money

[LordBrownTrout]

It's sad that people will not address the point. I guess I am not surprised. It is not not making money, it's about being subsidized.

Tell us about subsidizing? Our govt had no problem giving him and big box store trillions over the last two years. Why do you think our govt allowed that to happen?

 

[Ropey]

Bernie used to say "Millionaires"...

...until the pos became one.

Bernie Sanders is saying 'millionaires' less often, one way his 2020 message has changed

New decade, new messaging? Bernie Sanders is saying 'millionaires' less often in his campaign for the presidential nomination, focusing instead on billionaires.

headtopics.com

 

[pknopp]

Tell us about subsidizing? Our govt had no problem giving him and big box store trillions over the last two years. Why do you think our govt allowed that to happen?

They bend over for the rich.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

They bend over for the rich.

They sure do and they do it in order to get trinkets from these large corporations. Whenever a congressman leaves the senate or congress, they're multimillionaires.

 

[pknopp]

They sure do and they do it in order to get trinkets from these large corporations. Whenever a congressman leaves the senate or congress, they're multimillionaires.

Some benefit. Others stick around until they keel over dead but the point here remains.

 

[Nostra]

Reading obviously is not your strong suit.

Bullshit response, but expected.

I read where what your handlers sent you claimed he is stealing from carriers because he has his own trucks, Moron.

You seem to be the one who can’t read past a headline.

 

[pknopp]

Bullshit response, but expected.

I read where what your handlers

Trump started this argument. It's one of the few instances he was right but like with most everything he didn't actually do anything about it.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Some benefit. Others stick around until they keel over dead but the point here remains.

They all benefit.

 

[hadit]

No small businesses were closed in Noel, Mo.

Guess the Republicans were running the place pretty well.

 

[Nostra]

Trump started this argument. It's one of the few instances he was right but like with most everything he didn't actually do anything about it.

Explain the economics of Bezos “stealing“ from Fed Ex, UPS and USPS by using his own trucks.

Be specific.

 

[pknopp]

Explain the economics of Bezos “stealing“ from Fed Ex, UPS and USPS by using his own trucks.

Be specific.

I do not have to address your made up scenarios.

 

[Nostra]

I do not have to address your made up scenarios.

I made nothing up, you lying sack of shit. You made that claim when you used a link that said this:

This network is not just for Amazon's internal use. The retailer has developed it to carry non-Amazon packages too. Morgan Stanley recently estimated that Amazon would carry 3.5 billion outside parcels in its network, stealing up to $100 billion in revenue from UPS, FedEx, and USPS.

Now, explain how that is “stealing”, then show us these subsidies you claimed he gets.

 

[FA_Q2]

Trump argued it as the link noted.

That does not bolster your point.

The fact Trump uttered it certainly does not make one think there is a higher chance of it being true...

 

[FA_Q2]

Posted. As I noted, even Trump condemned them.

If that is the best source of government 'subsidizing' Amazon, your case is really falling apart.

Outline how you think that Amazon is using tax payer monies through USPS....

 

[pknopp]

That does not bolster your point.

The fact Trump uttered it certainly does not make one think there is a higher chance of it being true...

Of course not. Facts do that. It's explained in the link and it's hardly the only example.

 

[pknopp]

If that is the best source of government 'subsidizing' Amazon, your case is really falling apart.

Outline how you think that Amazon is using tax payer monies through USPS....

It's one source. That you aren't even interested in that simply shows that you aren't interested.

 

[Nostra]

Of course not. Facts do that. It's explained in the link and it's hardly the only example.

What are these examples? So far you have zero from your shit source.

 

[FA_Q2]

Of course not. Facts do that. It's explained in the link and it's hardly the only example.

Yet you keep repeating it as though it does. And a blank link is irrelevant.

Explain how you think this is taxpayer subsidization of Amazon....

 

[Nostra]

It's one source. That you aren't even interested in that simply shows that you aren't interested.

Outline these subsidies. Be specific and give dollar figures for each.

 

[FA_Q2]

It's one source. That you aren't even interested in that simply shows that you aren't interested.

It is the one source you brought to the table.

Am I supposed to find your sources for you?