Bernie calls for Free & Fair Brazil Elections: incumbent right wing authoritarian Jair Bolsonaro expected to contest results when he loses like Trump

[basquebromance]

Lula maintains large lead over Bolsonaro ahead of Brazil election ...look out!

Brazil election: Why it matters so much to the US

The US has been taking a keen interest in who Brazil picks as its next president. Why?

www.bbc.com

 

[themirrorthief]

Lula maintains large lead over Bolsonaro ahead of Brazil election ...look out!

Brazil election: Why it matters so much to the US

The US has been taking a keen interest in who Brazil picks as its next president. Why?

www.bbc.com

if trump lost,why is it liberals cant talk or think of anything else....at least they have the invisible man to lead biden around

 

[TheReaper]

Trump won you fucktard

The Stolen 2020 Election - Evidence

The 2020 United States election was stolen from Donald Trump. This page presents the evidence

terryobrien.online

The Stolen 2020 Election - Evidence

The 2020 United States election was stolen from Donald Trump. This page presents the evidence

terryobrien.online

 

[TheReaper]

The Stolen 2020 Election - Evidence

The 2020 United States election was stolen from Donald Trump. This page presents the evidence

terryobrien.online

On television and in the movies, circumstantial evidence is usually 'blown off' as near nothing. While direct evidence is portrayed as damning. Inference is the key as circumstantial evidence relies on inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact. In effect, circumstantial evidence allows for more than one interpretation and explanation of fact. All forensic evidence supplied on testimony by an expert witness is usually treated as circumstantial evidence.

Cases Won on Circumstantial Evidence

It requires the totality of circumstances to construct an inference, not the obviousness of the conclusion to establish circumstantial evidence. So, the majority of those convicted have been by a majority if not entirely by circumstantial evidence. Guilt or innocence is established by circumstantial evidence through reasoning. In most cases those who commit criminal acts tend to avoid conditions that would provide direct evidence. Criminal activities are generally done in secret, not openly. In the submission of circumstantial evidence, it depends on the attorney of either side to weave various bits and pieces into an understandable whole, or if defending to punch holes into the logical inference. If reasoning is the rational for establishing circumstantial evidence it is logical to expect reasoning to be used to refute it as well.

2020 Election

The totality of circumstances regarding the 2020 Election construct an inference that there was overwhelming fraud, and through reasoning, in a court of law, a prosecutor could convince a jury that the election was stolen.

Evidence

Throughout this page I will post various evidence, videos, documentaries, etc. Some are supportive, and some could prove all by themselves that the election was stolen. The totality of circumstantial evidence will allow us to come to the reasonable conclusion that the election was stolen.


THE EVIDENCE

1. The Documentary 2000 Mules

Website: https://node-3.2000mules.com - "Highly respected Dinesh D'Souza, working together with Catherine Engelbrecht of True the Vote, just released a trailer to their new movie, "2,000 Mules," that shows the world exactly how the 2020 Presidential Election was Rigged and Stolen. The movie exposes the lies of the Democrats, RINOs, and Fake News who say it was the "most secure election in history." It was, perhaps, the least secure in history. The ballot box was stuffed, and stuffed like never before—and it's all on video. Ballots were trafficked and sold in a massive operation in each Swing State. The evidence is so damning, what will the cowards who sat and did nothing about the stolen election say now? The way our votes were taken away is a disgrace to our Nation. It must be fixed" - Donald J. Trump

Using verified tracking technology, people carrying fake ballots were tracked leaving Democrat offices and going to ballot drop-off boxes to stuff them. The evidence is damning. According to Rasmussen Reports, the documentary, which investigates evidence of widespread cheating in the 2020 presidential election, is hitting home with voters who have seen the film. As of June 03, 2022, a Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey found that 77% of those Likely U.S. voters who have seen "2000 Mules" say the movie strengthened their conviction that there was systematic and widespread election fraud in the 2020 election. Only 19% of those who have seen the documentary say their belief in election fraud was weakened. As of June 03, 2022, only 15% of voters had seen "2000 Mules." Nineteen percent (19%) of Republicans, 14% of Democrats and 11% of voters not affiliated with either major party report having watched "2000 Mules." Awareness of the new documentary was much more widespread, with 41% of voters saying they've heard about "2000 Mules." That includes 50% of Republicans, 36% of Democrats and 38% of unaffiliated voters.

 

[TheReaper]

The Stolen 2020 Election - Evidence

The 2020 United States election was stolen from Donald Trump. This page presents the evidence

terryobrien.online

On television and in the movies, circumstantial evidence is usually 'blown off' as near nothing. While direct evidence is portrayed as damning. Inference is the key as circumstantial evidence relies on inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact. In effect, circumstantial evidence allows for more than one interpretation and explanation of fact. All forensic evidence supplied on testimony by an expert witness is usually treated as circumstantial evidence.

Cases Won on Circumstantial Evidence

It requires the totality of circumstances to construct an inference, not the obviousness of the conclusion to establish circumstantial evidence. So, the majority of those convicted have been by a majority if not entirely by circumstantial evidence. Guilt or innocence is established by circumstantial evidence through reasoning. In most cases those who commit criminal acts tend to avoid conditions that would provide direct evidence. Criminal activities are generally done in secret, not openly. In the submission of circumstantial evidence, it depends on the attorney of either side to weave various bits and pieces into an understandable whole, or if defending to punch holes into the logical inference. If reasoning is the rational for establishing circumstantial evidence it is logical to expect reasoning to be used to refute it as well.

2020 Election

The totality of circumstances regarding the 2020 Election construct an inference that there was overwhelming fraud, and through reasoning, in a court of law, a prosecutor could convince a jury that the election was stolen.

Evidence

Throughout this page I will post various evidence, videos, documentaries, etc. Some are supportive, and some could prove all by themselves that the election was stolen. The totality of circumstantial evidence will allow us to come to the reasonable conclusion that the election was stolen.


THE EVIDENCE

1. The Documentary 2000 Mules

Website: https://node-3.2000mules.com - "Highly respected Dinesh D'Souza, working together with Catherine Engelbrecht of True the Vote, just released a trailer to their new movie, "2,000 Mules," that shows the world exactly how the 2020 Presidential Election was Rigged and Stolen. The movie exposes the lies of the Democrats, RINOs, and Fake News who say it was the "most secure election in history." It was, perhaps, the least secure in history. The ballot box was stuffed, and stuffed like never before—and it's all on video. Ballots were trafficked and sold in a massive operation in each Swing State. The evidence is so damning, what will the cowards who sat and did nothing about the stolen election say now? The way our votes were taken away is a disgrace to our Nation. It must be fixed" - Donald J. Trump

Using verified tracking technology, people carrying fake ballots were tracked leaving Democrat offices and going to ballot drop-off boxes to stuff them. The evidence is damning. According to Rasmussen Reports, the documentary, which investigates evidence of widespread cheating in the 2020 presidential election, is hitting home with voters who have seen the film. As of June 03, 2022, a Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey found that 77% of those Likely U.S. voters who have seen "2000 Mules" say the movie strengthened their conviction that there was systematic and widespread election fraud in the 2020 election. Only 19% of those who have seen the documentary say their belief in election fraud was weakened. As of June 03, 2022, only 15% of voters had seen "2000 Mules." Nineteen percent (19%) of Republicans, 14% of Democrats and 11% of voters not affiliated with either major party report having watched "2000 Mules." Awareness of the new documentary was much more widespread, with 41% of voters saying they've heard about "2000 Mules." That includes 50% of Republicans, 36% of Democrats and 38% of unaffiliated voters.

2. Pennsylvania court: Secretary of state lacked authority to change deadline 2 days before Election Day

Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar violated the law and allowed proof of identification for mail in ballots to be provided up until Nov. 12. State law said that voters have until six days after the election, which was Nov. 9. to cure problems regarding a lack of proof of identification. Had the law been followed, Trump would have won, and many illegitimate ballots would not have been counted as legitimate. Pennsylvania's court decided that the Secretary of state lacked authority to change deadline 2 days before Election Day. Furthermore, Trump expected the action from the Supreme Court regarding whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court acted properly in granting the three-day extension for accepting mail-in ballots, and SCOTUS dropped the ball, not for the first or last time. This is one of those evidences which alone prove that Donald Trump was actually elected president.

 

[TheReaper]

The Stolen 2020 Election - Evidence

The 2020 United States election was stolen from Donald Trump. This page presents the evidence

terryobrien.online

On television and in the movies, circumstantial evidence is usually 'blown off' as near nothing. While direct evidence is portrayed as damning. Inference is the key as circumstantial evidence relies on inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact. In effect, circumstantial evidence allows for more than one interpretation and explanation of fact. All forensic evidence supplied on testimony by an expert witness is usually treated as circumstantial evidence.

Cases Won on Circumstantial Evidence

It requires the totality of circumstances to construct an inference, not the obviousness of the conclusion to establish circumstantial evidence. So, the majority of those convicted have been by a majority if not entirely by circumstantial evidence. Guilt or innocence is established by circumstantial evidence through reasoning. In most cases those who commit criminal acts tend to avoid conditions that would provide direct evidence. Criminal activities are generally done in secret, not openly. In the submission of circumstantial evidence, it depends on the attorney of either side to weave various bits and pieces into an understandable whole, or if defending to punch holes into the logical inference. If reasoning is the rational for establishing circumstantial evidence it is logical to expect reasoning to be used to refute it as well.

2020 Election

The totality of circumstances regarding the 2020 Election construct an inference that there was overwhelming fraud, and through reasoning, in a court of law, a prosecutor could convince a jury that the election was stolen.

Evidence

Throughout this page I will post various evidence, videos, documentaries, etc. Some are supportive, and some could prove all by themselves that the election was stolen. The totality of circumstantial evidence will allow us to come to the reasonable conclusion that the election was stolen.


THE EVIDENCE

1. The Documentary 2000 Mules

Website: https://node-3.2000mules.com - "Highly respected Dinesh D'Souza, working together with Catherine Engelbrecht of True the Vote, just released a trailer to their new movie, "2,000 Mules," that shows the world exactly how the 2020 Presidential Election was Rigged and Stolen. The movie exposes the lies of the Democrats, RINOs, and Fake News who say it was the "most secure election in history." It was, perhaps, the least secure in history. The ballot box was stuffed, and stuffed like never before—and it's all on video. Ballots were trafficked and sold in a massive operation in each Swing State. The evidence is so damning, what will the cowards who sat and did nothing about the stolen election say now? The way our votes were taken away is a disgrace to our Nation. It must be fixed" - Donald J. Trump

Using verified tracking technology, people carrying fake ballots were tracked leaving Democrat offices and going to ballot drop-off boxes to stuff them. The evidence is damning. According to Rasmussen Reports, the documentary, which investigates evidence of widespread cheating in the 2020 presidential election, is hitting home with voters who have seen the film. As of June 03, 2022, a Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey found that 77% of those Likely U.S. voters who have seen "2000 Mules" say the movie strengthened their conviction that there was systematic and widespread election fraud in the 2020 election. Only 19% of those who have seen the documentary say their belief in election fraud was weakened. As of June 03, 2022, only 15% of voters had seen "2000 Mules." Nineteen percent (19%) of Republicans, 14% of Democrats and 11% of voters not affiliated with either major party report having watched "2000 Mules." Awareness of the new documentary was much more widespread, with 41% of voters saying they've heard about "2000 Mules." That includes 50% of Republicans, 36% of Democrats and 38% of unaffiliated voters.

3. Conflicting Data

The claim is that Biden won 81+m votes, but despite this they lost house seats in the bluest of areas like New York and California. How could the biggest win in history not affect the down ballot races and not translate anywhere close to Biden's votes?

Trump won African-American majority counties 9% to Biden's 8%, he won Hispanic-majority counties by 39% to Biden's 19%, and Trump set GOP records with minority voters not seen since the 1960's. How are these things possible with Bidens massive win?

Trump INCREASED his votes between elections, by over 10.5m, which is second or third historically, and that almost never happens. Obama lost close to 4-5 million and was re-elected.

How did Biden win the most amount of votes ever on record, yet win the election with the fewest amount of counties won, also a record?

How did Trump lose the election, while carrying 99% of all Bellwether counties by an average of a 16-point margin? That many Bellwether counties being wrong on an election outcome is a statistical anomaly not ever seen on record.

Referring to the beginning of this page, the totality of this evidence is reaching a point where we can make a reasonable inference.

 

[TheReaper]

The Stolen 2020 Election - Evidence

The 2020 United States election was stolen from Donald Trump. This page presents the evidence

terryobrien.online

On television and in the movies, circumstantial evidence is usually 'blown off' as near nothing. While direct evidence is portrayed as damning. Inference is the key as circumstantial evidence relies on inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact. In effect, circumstantial evidence allows for more than one interpretation and explanation of fact. All forensic evidence supplied on testimony by an expert witness is usually treated as circumstantial evidence.

Cases Won on Circumstantial Evidence

It requires the totality of circumstances to construct an inference, not the obviousness of the conclusion to establish circumstantial evidence. So, the majority of those convicted have been by a majority if not entirely by circumstantial evidence. Guilt or innocence is established by circumstantial evidence through reasoning. In most cases those who commit criminal acts tend to avoid conditions that would provide direct evidence. Criminal activities are generally done in secret, not openly. In the submission of circumstantial evidence, it depends on the attorney of either side to weave various bits and pieces into an understandable whole, or if defending to punch holes into the logical inference. If reasoning is the rational for establishing circumstantial evidence it is logical to expect reasoning to be used to refute it as well.

2020 Election

The totality of circumstances regarding the 2020 Election construct an inference that there was overwhelming fraud, and through reasoning, in a court of law, a prosecutor could convince a jury that the election was stolen.

Evidence

Throughout this page I will post various evidence, videos, documentaries, etc. Some are supportive, and some could prove all by themselves that the election was stolen. The totality of circumstantial evidence will allow us to come to the reasonable conclusion that the election was stolen.


THE EVIDENCE

1. The Documentary 2000 Mules

Website: https://node-3.2000mules.com - "Highly respected Dinesh D'Souza, working together with Catherine Engelbrecht of True the Vote, just released a trailer to their new movie, "2,000 Mules," that shows the world exactly how the 2020 Presidential Election was Rigged and Stolen. The movie exposes the lies of the Democrats, RINOs, and Fake News who say it was the "most secure election in history." It was, perhaps, the least secure in history. The ballot box was stuffed, and stuffed like never before—and it's all on video. Ballots were trafficked and sold in a massive operation in each Swing State. The evidence is so damning, what will the cowards who sat and did nothing about the stolen election say now? The way our votes were taken away is a disgrace to our Nation. It must be fixed" - Donald J. Trump

Using verified tracking technology, people carrying fake ballots were tracked leaving Democrat offices and going to ballot drop-off boxes to stuff them. The evidence is damning. According to Rasmussen Reports, the documentary, which investigates evidence of widespread cheating in the 2020 presidential election, is hitting home with voters who have seen the film. As of June 03, 2022, a Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey found that 77% of those Likely U.S. voters who have seen "2000 Mules" say the movie strengthened their conviction that there was systematic and widespread election fraud in the 2020 election. Only 19% of those who have seen the documentary say their belief in election fraud was weakened. As of June 03, 2022, only 15% of voters had seen "2000 Mules." Nineteen percent (19%) of Republicans, 14% of Democrats and 11% of voters not affiliated with either major party report having watched "2000 Mules." Awareness of the new documentary was much more widespread, with 41% of voters saying they've heard about "2000 Mules." That includes 50% of Republicans, 36% of Democrats and 38% of unaffiliated voters.

4. Additional Data

We discovered a website with so much data and evidence on it that we decided not to attempt to disseminate it. Instead, we will allow you the reader to analyze it: CLICK HERE and be ready to be amazed.

It is titled "Election fraud and irregularities in 2020 Presidential elections". What is interesting about this site is that the authors are not Trump supporters at all. They are simply people who do not like fraud. Here are some highlights:

• Introduction
• The integrity of election is the key factor that provides political stability of the country
• The outsize role of mail-in ballots in 2020 Presidential elections
• History of election fraud in the USA
• Evidence of fraud in 2020 elections
• What types of election fraud we observe and should concentrate on
• There is no alternative to paper ballots and hand counting under video surveillance directly at voting places with the certification of results by both parties observers
• Further delegitimization of neoliberal oligarchy rule
• Known Red Flags
• The evidence

 

[TheReaper]

5. Video titled, "Scientific Proof of 2020 Election Fraud by Mike Lindell, featuring Dr. Douglas G Frank"

Dr. Douglas G. Frank has approximately sixty peer-reviewed scientific publications, including feature and cover articles in the leading scientific journals in the world (Science, Nature, Naturwissenschaften). During his graduate and postdoctoral work he discovered and developed a new type of microscopy capable of producing three-dimensional images of molecules resting on metal surfaces. This gave him international credibility in the area of Low Energy Electron Diffraction (LEED) and Auger electron spectroscopy and microscopy, and his work is prominently featured in college textbooks and handbooks on the subjects.

Dr. Frank left university academics in 1996, and began consulting, developing, and manufacturing surface analytical devices for national defense (DARPA) and various industries, especially the cleaning products industry and bowling ball manufacturers, where his custom electronics, software, inventions, and products continue to be widely used as industrial standards. Much of his work is protected by non-disclosure agreements.

During the 1990s, Dr. Frank helped to establish The Schilling School for Gifted Children in Cincinnati, Ohio. Schilling is a K-12 school for extraordinarily gifted youngsters, and Dr. Frank continues to teach a couple of their most advanced math and science classes each year, and continues to serve as the Math and Science Department chair. He earned a Ph.D. in Surface Electroanalytical Chemistry from the University of Cincinnati in 1990.

 

[basquebromance]

5. Video titled, "Scientific Proof of 2020 Election Fraud by Mike Lindell, featuring Dr. Douglas G Frank"

Dr. Douglas G. Frank has approximately sixty peer-reviewed scientific publications, including feature and cover articles in the leading scientific journals in the world (Science, Nature, Naturwissenschaften). During his graduate and postdoctoral work he discovered and developed a new type of microscopy capable of producing three-dimensional images of molecules resting on metal surfaces. This gave him international credibility in the area of Low Energy Electron Diffraction (LEED) and Auger electron spectroscopy and microscopy, and his work is prominently featured in college textbooks and handbooks on the subjects.

Dr. Frank left university academics in 1996, and began consulting, developing, and manufacturing surface analytical devices for national defense (DARPA) and various industries, especially the cleaning products industry and bowling ball manufacturers, where his custom electronics, software, inventions, and products continue to be widely used as industrial standards. Much of his work is protected by non-disclosure agreements.

During the 1990s, Dr. Frank helped to establish The Schilling School for Gifted Children in Cincinnati, Ohio. Schilling is a K-12 school for extraordinarily gifted youngsters, and Dr. Frank continues to teach a couple of their most advanced math and science classes each year, and continues to serve as the Math and Science Department chair. He earned a Ph.D. in Surface Electroanalytical Chemistry from the University of Cincinnati in 1990.

happy to debate you later today about Trump losing and getting his butt kicked in 2020...busy now