Benghazi!! Benghazi!! Benghazi !!

[DriftingSand]

The American Psychiatric Association’s latest handbook — the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) . It is the handbook of mental health, and if you’re not in it, you are among the fortunate few. I beseech the DSM’s publishers to consider one additional entry, the seriousness of which will be apparent to anyone who watches Fox News: Benghazi Syndrome.

Benghazi Syndrome is a grave malady of the white christian party

In the end, it all comes down to an irrational and absolutely rabid dislike of Obama that so clouds judgment that utterly preposterous statements are uttered, usually within the precincts of the Fox News studios. This, as you might have guessed, is classic Benghazi Syndrome. There is no known cure.

If you had it your way ... anyone who disagrees with your skewed worldview would be "listed." You have Trotsky-syndrome.

 

[Edgetho]

obama, like all dimocraps, is the scum of the earth

 

[Geaux4it]

I like list as I keep one too.

It's all good

-Geaux

 

[blackhawk]

Denial, denial, denial the mantra for the Obama worshipers.

 

[Darkwind]

What are the FACTS that prove the video had nothing to do with the attack?

And by facts I mean facts

Where are the facts it did, other than the Whitehouse saying so?

-Geaux

I'll take that to mean that there are no facts. Why then are you claiming it as fact?

There were no views of the video prior to the White House making claim that it was this video.

No one with an iota of intelligence believes that this deliberate attack on one of our consulates was anything but a deliberate attack by terrorists on one of our consulates.

The belief that the video was the reason is one of the top 10 conspiracy theories of all time.

 

[Claudette]

dimocraps are the scum of the earth.

ALL of them.

Didja know? MoJo is STILL using the LIE that the attack against the Consulate was over a video --

Mother Jones STILL Pushing Benghazi Attack Was Protest About Video, Refuted By Facts And Obama’s Own Words

What are the FACTS that prove the video had nothing to do with the attack?

And by facts I mean facts

Do you really not KNOWN the video had nothing to do with the attack? Are you really that uninformed?

It is well known that there was no demonstration against the video outside of the American counsel buildings or anywhere in Libya. It is equally well known that the attack was coordinated and carried out by elements of AQ...and you do know that AQ likes to kill Americans...right? It has been stated by many who were there, that the video had nothing to do with the attack. It was a terrorist attack on the 9/11 anniversary.

It is amazing that some believe whatever the government tells them, as long as that government is headed by the political party they approve of.

When will Americans learn that big uncontrolled government can never be trusted, no matter party affiliation.

Yup and they had months of warnings about an attack. The warnings that the Brits and the Red Cross took to heart. They closed their operations and left Libya.

Our State Department did nothing after repeated requests for beefed up security and four good men died.

Nobody at State payed a price. No head rolled. No one was fired and Barry had no problem jetting off to his Vegas fundraise the next day. That pretty much shows anyone with half a brain cell where his priorities were and it sure wasn't about four dead men. One of them his ambassador. Yup. What a guy.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Where are the facts it did, other than the Whitehouse saying so?

-Geaux

I'll take that to mean that there are no facts. Why then are you claiming it as fact?

There were no views of the video prior to the White House making claim that it was this video.

No one with an iota of intelligence believes that this deliberate attack on one of our consulates was anything but a deliberate attack by terrorists on one of our consulates.

The belief that the video was the reason is one of the top 10 conspiracy theories of all time.

from reading the emails released in the FOIA

it is quite clear that the admin did not know

WTF was going on other then it was a big deal

and started shaping the story based on news reports

until it mutated into blaming a youtube video

 

[NYcarbineer]

Where are the facts it did, other than the Whitehouse saying so?

-Geaux

I'll take that to mean that there are no facts. Why then are you claiming it as fact?

There were no views of the video prior to the White House making claim that it was this video.

No one with an iota of intelligence believes that this deliberate attack on one of our consulates was anything but a deliberate attack by terrorists on one of our consulates.

The belief that the video was the reason is one of the top 10 conspiracy theories of all time.

Your post is devoid of facts proving that the attackers were not 'inspired' by the video.

You can't even identify the attackers, how can you state as fact what their motivation was?

 

[bedowin62]

I'll take that to mean that there are no facts. Why then are you claiming it as fact?

There were no views of the video prior to the White House making claim that it was this video.

No one with an iota of intelligence believes that this deliberate attack on one of our consulates was anything but a deliberate attack by terrorists on one of our consulates.

The belief that the video was the reason is one of the top 10 conspiracy theories of all time.

Your post is devoid of facts proving that the attackers were not 'inspired' by the video.

You can't even identify the attackers, how can you state as fact what their motivation was?

IT IS A COVER-UP


you need to relax; you have zero facts yourself.
the investigation is uncovering the truth

just be quiet while Republicans do the heavy lifting ok?

 

[tinydancer]

Show the video

 

[NYcarbineer]

I'll take that to mean that there are no facts. Why then are you claiming it as fact?

There were no views of the video prior to the White House making claim that it was this video.

No one with an iota of intelligence believes that this deliberate attack on one of our consulates was anything but a deliberate attack by terrorists on one of our consulates.

The belief that the video was the reason is one of the top 10 conspiracy theories of all time.

from reading the emails released in the FOIA

it is quite clear that the admin did not know

WTF was going on other then it was a big deal

and started shaping the story based on news reports

until it mutated into blaming a youtube video

There were reports from the scene of attackers citing their outrage over the video.

You people, as usual, have conveniently ignored those reports.

 

[bedowin62]

There were no views of the video prior to the White House making claim that it was this video.

No one with an iota of intelligence believes that this deliberate attack on one of our consulates was anything but a deliberate attack by terrorists on one of our consulates.

The belief that the video was the reason is one of the top 10 conspiracy theories of all time.

from reading the emails released in the FOIA

it is quite clear that the admin did not know

WTF was going on other then it was a big deal

and started shaping the story based on news reports

until it mutated into blaming a youtube video

There were reports from the scene of attackers citing their outrage over the video.

You people, as usual, have conveniently ignored those reports.

sure dork; because people outraged over a video are usually able to express their displeasure with sustained and accurate MORTAR FIRE.
I ALWAYS bring my mortars down to the demonstration dont you?

you're a joke

 

[Dot Com]

This is what the people want!!! Not tax reform, not immigration reform, BOTH of which would be a boon to the economy but more Repub show trials (Pssst- the show trials aren't free either deficit hawks )

 

[jon_berzerk]

There were no views of the video prior to the White House making claim that it was this video.

No one with an iota of intelligence believes that this deliberate attack on one of our consulates was anything but a deliberate attack by terrorists on one of our consulates.

The belief that the video was the reason is one of the top 10 conspiracy theories of all time.

from reading the emails released in the FOIA

it is quite clear that the admin did not know

WTF was going on other then it was a big deal

and started shaping the story based on news reports

until it mutated into blaming a youtube video

There were reports from the scene of attackers citing their outrage over the video.

You people, as usual, have conveniently ignored those reports.

actually that is false

 

[NYcarbineer]

There were no views of the video prior to the White House making claim that it was this video.

No one with an iota of intelligence believes that this deliberate attack on one of our consulates was anything but a deliberate attack by terrorists on one of our consulates.

The belief that the video was the reason is one of the top 10 conspiracy theories of all time.

Your post is devoid of facts proving that the attackers were not 'inspired' by the video.

You can't even identify the attackers, how can you state as fact what their motivation was?

IT IS A COVER-UP


you need to relax; you have zero facts yourself.
the investigation is uncovering the truth

just be quiet while Republicans do the heavy lifting ok?

No one knows why the attackers attacked, but people like you are pretending you know.

That is lying. To state as fact something that cannot be shown to be factual is a lie.

Your indictment of the administration is based on a lie.

 

[bedowin62]

Your post is devoid of facts proving that the attackers were not 'inspired' by the video.

You can't even identify the attackers, how can you state as fact what their motivation was?

IT IS A COVER-UP


you need to relax; you have zero facts yourself.
the investigation is uncovering the truth

just be quiet while Republicans do the heavy lifting ok?

No one knows why the attackers attacked, but people like you are pretending you know.

That is lying. To state as fact something that cannot be shown to be factual is a lie.

Your indictment of the administration is based on a lie.

thats why an investigation is warranted

you're making a fool of yourself as usual
the only reason you oppose an investigation is because deep in your heart you know it is a cover-up going on

 

[paperview]

Where are the facts it did, other than the Whitehouse saying so?

-Geaux

I'll take that to mean that there are no facts. Why then are you claiming it as fact?

There were no views of the video prior to the White House making claim that it was this video.

No one with an iota of intelligence believes that this deliberate attack on one of our consulates was anything but a deliberate attack by terrorists on one of our consulates.

The belief that the video was the reason is one of the top 10 conspiracy theories of all time.

It was being broadcast on T.V's in the Middle East. What was happening earlier in the day in Egypt? The whole damn world was watching that.

To remind again:

"Then, on Sept. 8, a popular Islamist preacher lit the fuse by screening a clip of the video on the ultraconservative Egyptian satellite channel El Nas. American diplomats in Cairo raised the alarm in Washington about a growing backlash, including calls for a protest outside their embassy."

You can't go by just "youtube views" -- they were showing clips of it on Middle Eastern TV's.

Also, too:

"But Islamists in Benghazi were watching. Egyptian satellite networks like El Nas and El Rahma were widely available in Benghazi.

“It is Friday morning viewing,” popular on the day of prayer, said one young Benghazi Islamist who turned up at the compound during the attack, speaking on the condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals.

By Sept. 9, a popular eastern Libyan Facebook page had denounced the film. On the morning of Sept. 11, even some secular political activists were posting calls online for a protest that Friday, three days away.

Hussein Abu Hamida, the acting chief of Benghazi’s informal police force, saw the growing furor and feared new violence against Western interests." -From the NYT account

Also, the Grand Mafti had issued calls days before for protests about the film.

 

[bedowin62]

I'll take that to mean that there are no facts. Why then are you claiming it as fact?

There were no views of the video prior to the White House making claim that it was this video.

No one with an iota of intelligence believes that this deliberate attack on one of our consulates was anything but a deliberate attack by terrorists on one of our consulates.

The belief that the video was the reason is one of the top 10 conspiracy theories of all time.

It was being broadcast on T.V's in the Middle East. What was happening earlier in the day in Egypt? The whole damn world was watching that.

To remind again:

"Then, on Sept. 8, a popular Islamist preacher lit the fuse by screening a clip of the video on the ultraconservative Egyptian satellite channel El Nas. American diplomats in Cairo raised the alarm in Washington about a growing backlash, including calls for a protest outside their embassy."

You can't go by just "youtube views" -- they were showing clips of it on Middle Eastern TV's.

Also, too:

"But Islamists in Benghazi were watching. Egyptian satellite networks like El Nas and El Rahma were widely available in Benghazi.

“It is Friday morning viewing,” popular on the day of prayer, said one young Benghazi Islamist who turned up at the compound during the attack, speaking on the condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals.

By Sept. 9, a popular eastern Libyan Facebook page had denounced the film. On the morning of Sept. 11, even some secular political activists were posting calls online for a protest that Friday, three days away.

Hussein Abu Hamida, the acting chief of Benghazi’s informal police force, saw the growing furor and feared new violence against Western interests." -From the NYT account

Also, the Grand Mafti had issued calls days before for protests about the film.

regular folk expressing outrage over a video dont lay down MORTAR FIRE when they're demonstrating

 

[jon_berzerk]

Your post is devoid of facts proving that the attackers were not 'inspired' by the video.

You can't even identify the attackers, how can you state as fact what their motivation was?

IT IS A COVER-UP


you need to relax; you have zero facts yourself.
the investigation is uncovering the truth

just be quiet while Republicans do the heavy lifting ok?

No one knows why the attackers attacked, but people like you are pretending you know.

That is lying. To state as fact something that cannot be shown to be factual is a lie.

Your indictment of the administration is based on a lie.

which attack

the first one on the mission

or the one several hours later on the cia annex building

 

[paperview]

Headline news the same day that email was sent.

Sep 14, 2012 10:11AM ET / Global <-------

A Map of Muslim Protests Around the World

Reuters / Google Maps

If you can't keep track of all the Muslim protests erupting across the globe, you're not alone. The uproar over a 14-minute anti-Islam YouTube video has sparked furious protests from Somalia to Egypt to Sudan to Tunisia to Libya to Bangladesh to Indonesia to Pakistan. With new reports of protests surfacing every minute, we've compiled the latest reported incidents into this handy interactive Google Map. Click the locations and embedded links for more details about each incident."

A Map of Muslim Protests Around the World - The Wire