Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Wait. SO because someone somewhere made some statement about Benghazi that wasnt proven that means every statement about Benghazi is irrelevant?The OP attempts to explain why Benghazi is relevant.
I'll tell you why it is relevant, and it has nothing to do with seeking the truth since we have seen the lies the hacks have manufactured. "Obama watched as they died." "Stand down order."
No, this is not a quest for truth. Benghazi is relevant because the rubes must be kept in the fold. They must not be allowed to think for themselves and wander off and start thinking critically.
"Benghazi" is a totem. A rhetorical device to keep the rubes drinking whatever piss is poured for them.
The rubes must never catch on they are always being lied to.
On September 11, 2012, a series of protests and violent attacks began in response to a YouTube trailer for a film called Innocence of Muslims, considered blasphemous by many Muslims. The reactions began at U.S. diplomatic mission in Cairo, Egypt, and quickly spread across the Muslim world to additional U.S. and other countries' diplomatic missions and other locations, with issues beyond the offense at the movie trailer becoming subjects of protest. In Cairo a group scaled the embassy wall and tore down the American flag to replace it with a black Islamic flag.
On September 13, protests occurred at the U.S. embassy in Sana'a, Yemen, resulting in the deaths of four protesters and injuries to thirty-five protesters and guards. On September 14, the U.S. consulate in Chennai was attacked, resulting in injuries to twenty-five protesters.[14] Protesters in Tunis, Tunisia, climbed the U.S. embassy walls and set trees on fire. At least four people were killed and forty-six injured during protests in Tunis on September 15.[6] Further protests were held at U.S. diplomatic missions and other locations in the days following the initial attacks. Related protests and attacks resulted in numerous deaths and injuries across the Middle East, Africa, Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Attacks on Americans on foreign soil since 1980 that resulted in American deaths.
Beirut Barracks Bombings-241 Servicemen killed. No Congressional Public Hearings-No pointing fingers, despite warnings of an attack. .
USS Cole attack-17 Servicemen killed. No Congressional Hearings-No pointing fingers, despite warnings of an attack.
12 Embassy/Consultant attacks during George W Bush-13 Americans killed including OS Diplomat David Foy. No Congressional Hearings-No finger pointing, despite warnings of attacks on most of these incidents.
Benghazi Attack-4 Americans killed including Ambassador Christopher Stevens- 13 Congressional Hearings and a ton of finger pointing. There were warnings of such an attack.
There were warnings on most of these attacks, yet only one got Congressional Hearings and that one has had 13 hearings. Why weren't there hearings on previous attacks by Congress 14 previous attacks?
Anyone?
Lemme check. Nope, Benghazi was still not caused by a video.September 11, 2012:
Egyptians angry at film scale U.S. embassy walls
Egyptian protesters scaled the walls of the U.S. embassy on Tuesday, tore down the American flag and burned it during a protest over what they said was a film being produced in the United States that insulted Prophet Mohammad.
In place of the U.S. flag, the protesters tried to raise a black flag with the words "There is no God but God, and Mohammad is his messenger", a Reuters witness said.
Once the U.S. flag was hauled down, some protesters tore it up and showed off pieces to television cameras. Others burned the remains outside the fortress-like embassy building in central Cairo. But some protesters objected to the flag burning.
Wait. SO because someone somewhere made some statement about Benghazi that wasnt proven that means every statement about Benghazi is irrelevant?
Actually, the video was a factor. This has been shown many times.Lemme check. Nope, Benghazi was still not caused by a video.
September 11, 2012:
Egyptians angry at film scale U.S. embassy walls
Egyptian protesters scaled the walls of the U.S. embassy on Tuesday, tore down the American flag and burned it during a protest over what they said was a film being produced in the United States that insulted Prophet Mohammad.
In place of the U.S. flag, the protesters tried to raise a black flag with the words "There is no God but God, and Mohammad is his messenger", a Reuters witness said.
Once the U.S. flag was hauled down, some protesters tore it up and showed off pieces to television cameras. Others burned the remains outside the fortress-like embassy building in central Cairo. But some protesters objected to the flag burning.
Wow. You people really are retarded.September 11, 2012:
Egyptians angry at film scale U.S. embassy walls
Egyptian protesters scaled the walls of the U.S. embassy on Tuesday, tore down the American flag and burned it during a protest over what they said was a film being produced in the United States that insulted Prophet Mohammad.
In place of the U.S. flag, the protesters tried to raise a black flag with the words "There is no God but God, and Mohammad is his messenger", a Reuters witness said.
Once the U.S. flag was hauled down, some protesters tore it up and showed off pieces to television cameras. Others burned the remains outside the fortress-like embassy building in central Cairo. But some protesters objected to the flag burning.
Golly... that was 9-11-2012, ya say?
Maybe THIS had something to do with that?
9/9/2012
"US STATE DEPARTMENT RELEASES GRAPHIC ANTI-ISLAMIC STATE VIDEO"
US State Department Releases Graphic Anti-Islamic State Video - Breitbart
Was that somehow responsive to what I wrote?Amazing.We dont know if those things are true or not. But what we do know that is true supports the idea that the president and the sec state are incompetent boobs and deliberately lied about what happned to cover it up and serve their political needs. Why that doesnt outrage you is beyond me.
You drank a lot of piss, and don't care that it is piss, and yet believe that piss is evidence Obama is an incompetent boob!
Wow.
The desire to believe whatever bullshit aligns with one's belief system still continues to amaze me to this day.
Sorry, but the lies that were told by your partisan hack puppeteers proves nothing about Obama. But it proves much about you.
Moving the goalposts?You are actually going to say with a straight face that no other embassies were dealing with protests at that time?No lies, Both answers and the comment are absolutely 100%.Both of your answers are wrong.1. It is irrelevant. We know one did and he was ignored.Questions never addressed by Benghziheads:
1. How many ambassadors were requesting extra security for their consulates and embassies around the Middle East and around the world during this period?
2. How many embassies were dealing with riots and protests at their gates just before the attack on the backwater consulate in Benghazi?
The OP video is much like the ever changing "Loose Change" string of videos. Every time some piece of completely bogus manufactured bullshit is destroyed, the puppeteers go back to the editing room and remake the story, and the idiot rubes refill their piss cups and drink from their cocks again and again and again.
The vision built in the heads of the rubes has changed many times, and it never occurs to the rubes the story they believe today is completely different than the one they started out with!
A fascinating phenomenon.
The video in the OP, just like all partisan reporting surrounding Benghazi, is guilty of lies of omission. They only present "facts" which fit into their partisan hackery, and leave out anything inconvenient to the bullshit meme they are trying to construct in the minds of their rubes.
2. None.
What does it matter? Why didnt the State Department take ANY action to protect their employees? Whydid they leave those people to die?
You see? Lying just comes naturally to you rubes.
Why are you not bothered that Obama lied about the whole incident?
Seriously?
You are either a blazing retard or a bald faced liar.
Reports of the video were just beginning to spread on Sept. 9 when Mr. McFarland, then the officer normally in charge of politics and economics at the United States Embassy in Tripoli, had his meeting with the Benghazi militia leaders. Among them were some of the same men who had greeted Mr. Stevens when he arrived in Benghazi at the start of the revolt, including Mr. Gharabi, 39, a heavyset former Abu Salim inmate who ran a local sandwich truck before becoming the leader of the Rafallah al-Sehati. Another was Wissam bin Hamid, also 39, a slim and slightly hunched mechanic known for his skill with American cars who by then had become the leader of Libya Shield, considered one of the strongest militias in Libya.
In an interview, Mr. Gharabi said that he had known about the building rage in Egypt over the video, but that, We did not know if it was going to reach us here.
Mr. McFarland seemed most concerned about the big militia leaders. 'How do the revolutionaries feel about having relationships with Western countries? What is your opinion about the United States?' the Americans asked, according to Mr. Gharabi. It was an interrogation, he said.
We told them that we hoped that the countries which helped us during the war would now help us in development, he said. And America was at the top of the pyramid.
But Mr. Gharabi and two other Libyan militia leaders present said separately that they tried to warn Mr. McFarland. We told them, Weapons are everywhere, in every home, and there is no real control,'  Mr. Bin Hamid of Libya Shield said.
Mr. McFarland struggled to make sense of their contradictory signals. The message was, Dont come here because there is no security, but come right away because we need you,'  Mr. McFarland later told colleagues.
The militia leaders seemed unable to get their stories straight, his colleagues said, and the vague warnings amounted to a reminder of what the diplomats already knew: Post-revolutionary Benghazi was a dangerous place.
Around dusk, the Pan-Arab satellite networks began broadcasting footage of protesters breaching the walls of the American Embassy in Cairo, pulling down the American flag and running up the black banner of militant Islam. Young men around Benghazi began calling one another with the news, several said, and many learned of the video for the first time.
There is no doubt that anger over the video motivated many attackers. A Libyan journalist working for The New York Times was blocked from entering by the sentries outside, and he learned of the film from the fighters who stopped him. Other Libyan witnesses, too, said they received lectures from the attackers about the evil of the film and the virtue of defending the prophet.
So anyone who says he wants the truth about Benghazi must not because some other guy somewhere else said something different.Wait. SO because someone somewhere made some statement about Benghazi that wasnt proven that means every statement about Benghazi is irrelevant?
No, it means the hacks and their piss drinking minions are not after the truth. I've stated that plainly several times.
Moving the goalposts?
[/QUOTE]Attacks on Americans on foreign soil since 1980 that resulted in American deaths.
Beirut Barracks Bombings-241 Servicemen killed. No Congressional Public Hearings-No pointing fingers, despite warnings of an attack.
The terrorist attack was exhaustively investigated. It was a terrorist attack. Thus the fingers all pointed to the terrorists who attacked. The US responded to that attack by eviscerating the terrorists who planned the attack.
USS Cole attack-17 Servicemen killed. No Congressional Hearings-No pointing fingers, despite warnings of an attack.
The terrorist attack on the Cole was exhaustively investigated and those investigations all concluded that it was a terrorist attack. The subsequent fingers pointed toward the terrorists who planned and executed the attack, with attacks against those individuals.
12 Embassy/Consultant attacks during George W Bush-13 Americans killed including OS Diplomat David Foy. No Congressional Hearings-No finger pointing, despite warnings of attacks on most of these incidents.
Isn't it cool when the idiots comment on a video which they so clearly failed to watch?
FYI: Here's the video. Look to between 50 seconds and 1 minute 50 seconds. It corrects your erroneous figures and untangles your twisted rationalizations regarding the above drivel.
Enjoy...
Its all laid out. BUt here ya go.Benghazi QUESTIONS:
Can an honest Conservative please explain the following to me - with "credible" proof:
1. What is the alleged Benghazi cover-up?
2. What was allegedly covered up?
3. Who allegedly covered anything up?
4. Why was anything allegedly covered up?
5. Who and how did anyone benefit from any alleged cover-up?
6. Did anyone in the Obama Administration allegedly intentionally cause the Benghazi tragedy?
7. Were any laws allegedly broken?
8. How is Benghazi allegedly different from embassy/consulate attacks and deaths under Reagan and G.W. Bush?
9. Why do Conservatives continue their obsession to politicize the Benghazi tragedy for points and profits?
I think you lie. I think you are on your Obama knee pads right now sucking some version of his phallus.Moving the goalposts?
Nope. You lied, thus demonstrating you rubes are not the slightest bit interested in the truth.
Where-R-my-Keys just lied, too. Badly.
Attacks on Americans on foreign soil since 1980 that resulted in American deaths.
Beirut Barracks Bombings-241 Servicemen killed. No Congressional Public Hearings-No pointing fingers, despite warnings of an attack.
The terrorist attack was exhaustively investigated. It was a terrorist attack. Thus the fingers all pointed to the terrorists who attacked. The US responded to that attack by eviscerating the terrorists who planned the attack.
USS Cole attack-17 Servicemen killed. No Congressional Hearings-No pointing fingers, despite warnings of an attack.
The terrorist attack on the Cole was exhaustively investigated and those investigations all concluded that it was a terrorist attack. The subsequent fingers pointed toward the terrorists who planned and executed the attack, with attacks against those individuals.
12 Embassy/Consultant attacks during George W Bush-13 Americans killed including OS Diplomat David Foy. No Congressional Hearings-No finger pointing, despite warnings of attacks on most of these incidents.
Isn't it cool when the idiots comment on a video which they so clearly failed to watch?
FYI: Here's the video. Look to between 50 seconds and 1 minute 50 seconds. It corrects your erroneous figures and untangles your twisted rationalizations regarding the above drivel.
Enjoy...
Actually, the video was a factor. This has been shown many times.Lemme check. Nope, Benghazi was still not caused by a video.
And you said no other embassies were dealing with protests when in fact the embassy in Egypt was stormed.
You lied, and now you are trying to divert from the fact I just proved you lied.
Actually, the video was a factor. This has been shown many times.Lemme check. Nope, Benghazi was still not caused by a video.
And you said no other embassies were dealing with protests when in fact the embassy in Egypt was stormed.
You lied, and now you are trying to divert from the fact I just proved you lied.
