Wow, some pretty nasty racism from the Regressive Left on this thread.
You folks don't even TRY to hide it at this point.
.
That may be.
But, I noticed that no one from the right answered my question (Post 27) as to why conservatives abandoned Carson very quickly over basically nothing (West Point scholarship). Yet Trump, Cruz and Rubio have had their own multiple bumps without being abandoned.
To me, that indicates that Carson's support was very fragile, yet they loved what he had to say. Why was he discarded so quickly?
I doubt that it was about his skin color. In fact, I'd guess right now that the GOP would give any minority more than a fair chance just to buck PC.
He and Trump are the "anti-establishment" (whatever that may mean) candidates, and it was always going to be one or the other. As I recall, Carson's numbers tanked when those stories came out that made him look like some of his background was, uh, made up.
Either way, these folks love them some Trump. If he were not in the race, I'd betcha Carson would be #1 or #2.
.
Thanks for response, but I just happen to disagree with you.
During the 2-3 days when the Carson-West Point scholarship thing was the Big Topic on USMB, I defended Carson over this bogus scandal. At the time, I never imagined what a huge negative effect it had on Carson's campaign. He got tossed to the side quicker than it takes to say "OK honey, I'll take out the garbage." The guy was climbing in the primary polls and then walla, he's doing a nose dive.
Other candidates, make errors, are caught in outright lies or insult the wrong person and those mistakes are either ignored or rabidly defended.
Why the difference? There was/is a difference with a doubt.