Meriweather
Not all who wander are lost
- Oct 21, 2014
- 17,317
- 3,571
- 165
Don't know. I seldom read links.Are we together on denouncing that too as biblical nonsense?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Don't know. I seldom read links.Are we together on denouncing that too as biblical nonsense?
Don't go there my friend.Specifically, which verses?
The Bible was written by man, not by God in the language of man, not the language of God. It is then interpreted by us thousands of years later. If people want to concluded "Young Earth" I see no problem. That conclusion is not going to affect how they live their daily lives.The question is, can the god's word cause us to look and see a young earth in our minds?
There is no "Old Testament". Christianity co-opted Hebrew theology by attaching and largely rewriting a substantially different version of god.Both the Old Testament and the New Testament teach, Seek and you will find."
Have you been actively seeking?
Specifically, which verses?
Doubtful. When context is taken into consideration there are few contradictions.you'll just get yourself deeper into the bibles' contradictions.
The Bible was written by man, not by God in the language of man, not the language of God. It is then interpreted by us thousands of years later. If people want to concluded "Young Earth" I see no problem. That conclusion is not going to affect how they live their daily lives.
It wasn't a link, it was a quote. If your excuse for avoiding the question is that, then you're refusing to acknowledge the contradictions that are coming home to haunt you.Don't know. I seldom read links.
Of course there is. Sometimes I call it the Hebrew Bible; other times I call it the Tanakh. For you, I chose the Old Testament.There is no "Old Testament".
Oh? What message was I given?Yes. The gods told me you are greatly misinterpreting their message.
For example, the intent by the original author(s) of the Creation Story is not to teach creation occurred in literally six days. It was speaking of periods of time. In English, we might use the words 'era' or perhaps 'eon'. But then English has more than 165,000 words than does the Hebrew. In the Hebrew language it notes a time with a beginning and an end. The Hebrew writers could not have even envisioned a subjective language such as English, let alone that many words.You said their original intent. I'm asking what do you mean?
Are you speaking of the books as we know them today?Genesis.. the pentateuch... Was written 800 years after the death of Moses.
For example, the intent by the original author(s) of the Creation Story is not to teach creation occurred in literally six days. It was speaking of periods of time. In English, we might use the words 'era' or perhaps 'eon'. But then English has more than 165,000 words than does the Hebrew. In the Hebrew language it notes a time with a beginning and an end. The Hebrew writers could not have even envisioned a subjective language such as English, let alone that many words.
Are you speaking of the books as we know them today?
Not at all. I will take any of the specific verses you may feel are contradictory, but my studies of most of them is that they fit their specific contexts.It wasn't a link, it was a quote. If your excuse for avoiding the question is that, then you're refusing to acknowledge the contradictions that are coming home to haunt you.
Beginning and end. Hebrew is a picturesque language.It says the morning and the evening.. that's pretty clear.
Beginning and end. Hebrew is a picturesque language.
The first five books then. Same question, though. How was the 800 years after Moses determined?The Torah.
What does it mean to you?Morning and evening is pretty clear.
What does it mean to you?