Well let's hear it from the horse's mouth, by listening to offspring of the IslamoNazi Palestinians animals as to how they enjoyed the killing and theiving.
LOL, this drivel from a well known Hasbara site was posted in 2011 when the woman was 92, that would mean she was 10 years old in 1929; she probably never witnessed anything as young girls would have been kept indoors during a riot, but it's possible she may have heard exaggerated stories in the decades that followed, nevertheless hardly a reliable "witness" or source. FYI, I spoke to a veteran of el-Alemein a few years ago, he was in his nineties too and he was convinced that Germans used 150mm anti tank guns against him; I suggested 50mm (the standard german AT gun at the time), but he said definitely 150mm...memories are unreliable unless corroborated from other sources.
The Germans did use 150mm artillery in the direct fire mode against armor in times of emergency so he could very well be correct. Memory is indeed fallible, however certain things will remain solidly reliable up until the person dies. Traumatic events such as those being discussed are the very type of events that remain crystal clear in the memory banks.
I'm well aware of that, but without straying too far off topic, the chap I was speaking to was a tank gunner in the Sherwood Rangers Regiment, which I was researching at the time. After noting his account, I checked the Regimental diary to put his account in context. The regiment never got as far as the enemy artillery areas so never encountered emergency direct fire from german artillery; it never happened as he described. However the regiment, part of 10th Armoured Division,
was attacked on the 24th October while holding Miteiriya Ridge, during which it suffered from an intense artillery barrage, which undoubtedly included 150mm shells alongside the more commonplace 105mm and assorted mortar rounds. After 60-70 years, his memories of the traumatic experience he may have had, closed up in a Crusader turret, may well have been skewed and conflated, with this or subsequent combats. Memories become unreliable the further away from the incident the person is in time, even for eye witnesses.
Returning to the 10 year old girl, who was probably never an eye witness to the events of 1929, nor would she have been traumatised at the time, but subsequent brutality or trauma she may have encountered from subsequent events, like the Zionist terrorism in the1940's or the 1948 Palestinian expulsions could easily create fantasies in her head conflated with stories she may have heard at other times. That's why any such account must be corroborated before it's given undue credence.
It also amuses me that anything filmed by Palestinians that may be detrimental to their image is considered "gospel truth" by the Hasbarists here, yet anything filmed by Palestinians detrimental to the Zionist regime is always glibly dismissed as "Pallywood".
