rylah
Gold Member
- Jun 10, 2015
- 23,727
- 5,050
- 290
Although there were no Jews nor Muslims present in Jerusalem in A.D. 1099, no-one doubts that, like Christians and Muslims, some Jews remained in the Holy Land over the centuries if not in any significant numbers. The problem for Christians and Muslims nowadays is that, like the Crusaders of old, Zionists are attempting to maintain an exclusively Jewish sectarian state in a land where the indigenous Arabs have been and continue to be displaced and dispossessed. Zionists refused to share the land with Christians and Muslims who have lived in Palestine for many centuries. It is the reason Israel, including Judea and Sumeria, is doomed to become an official Apartheid state.That sounds about right.Dumb one, there were a small cult of them in biblical times and they were never there in any large numbers since ...
So they have been there for millennia, then. Just not very many of them.
The same goes for Christians too.
After Mohammad, the predominant religion in the Holy Land has been Islam of course, although Christians laid claim to the cradle of the Holy Faith.
![]()
The Looting of Jerusalem by Crusaders in A.D. 1099 when all Jews and Muslims were put to the sword making the city exclusively Christian. “The slaughter was so great that our men waded in blood up to their ankles.”
Interesting, all I see is another proof Jews were present, rights to their land, and connection to Jerusalem.
Another collection of bogus slogans.
In fact the Russian Orthodoxy and the Vatican own and control lands in Jerusalem. As much as Druze, Bahai and many other religions in other places in Israel.
Edit: On the other hand Jews were banned from their holy sites for centuries by both Christians and Muslims. This is still the case on Temple Mount...and who who gave away the control over the Mount to the Muslim waqf?
Is there a more religiously-tolerant country in the ME?
Last edited:
