Mark McGuire Stands Up To The Congressional Urine Testers
CounterPunch
March 18, 2005
The Congressional Urine Testers
Baseball's Theater of the Absurd
By DAVE ZIRIN
Congress did not disappoint anyone who wanted to see the Elephants and Donkeys on both sides of the aisle mate and become a litter of Jackasses. Committee chair Tom Davis kicked off the day by stating, "We're not interested in embarrassing anyone or ruining careers or grandstanding..." Then he and his fellow members of congress set about preening like peacocks before the cameras, proving the adage that "modern politics is celebrity for ugly people."
The players' seething hostility toward Canseco was so thick in the halls of congress that he even had to be placed in a separate, guarded waiting room before the hearing. At the witness table, no player hid their contempt of the player whose name is now synonymous with stool pigeonry in every clubhouse. As Schilling said, ``The allegations made in that book, the attempts to smear the names of players both past and present, having been made by one who for years vehemently denied steroid use, should be seen for what they are: an attempt to make money at the expense of others.''
Yet while Canseco sweated under the hot lights, the player being lacerated in the hearing's aftermath is Mark McGwire. McGwire, who has been out of the public eye since retiring in 2002, was the only player who did not deny under oath having used steroids. As sports columnist Larry Biel put it, "McGwire's silence was deafening. In the court of public opinion, McGwire looked very guilty. " Another columnist, the Washington Post's Thomas Boswell, wrote that McGwire "left the hearing room with his reputation in tatters"
But for those of us who consider these hearings a farcical "shamockery", and disturbing exercise in government power, should be proud of Big Mac's performance. He was the only player to actually stand up to the committee saying, ``I will use whatever influence and popularity that I have to discourage young athletes from taking any drug that is not recommended by a doctor. What I will not do, however, is participate in naming names and implicating my friends and teammates.''
McGwire was also the only person to challenge the entire logic of the proceedings. The argument has been that however comical these hearings may be, if they "save one life" from the harmful effects of steroids then all the grandstanding tomfoolery is worth it." But as McGwire put it, 'Asking me, or any other player, to answer questions about who took steroids in front of television cameras will not solve this problem. If a player answers, 'No,' he simply will not be believed. If he answers, 'Yes,' he risks public scorn and endless government investigations.'
http://www.counterpunch.org/zirin03182005.html