As said above, terminology is important. A man who molests boys is a HOMOSEXUAL. He is sexually attracted to people of his own gender. That what the word means.
One can observe that he is a homosexual whose sexual maturation was stunted for some reason, and probably suppressed, but the inclination is there, which defines him as homosexual.
But this is not a general indictment of homosexuals any more than observing that men who abuse little girls are heterosexual.
But a man who is an "open" homosexual and has "normal" relationships with other men is no more likely to molest children than a heterosexual adult who relates normally to his spouse. Almost NONE of the abusers who have come to light in recent decades have been "open" homosexuals, and yet many of them have been married, with wives and kids. One might almost conclude that an open homosexual is less likely to be a child abuser than a married man.