Banned words

[Dante]

We see you

 

[martybegan]

not into that ghetto crap

But I can see how you got to be so racist

Stay in your narrow little hole.

 

[luiza]

You really in England? My roots from there go deep.

Not only England but from the International Resort of Brighton , as I make clear in chapter seven of my profile .

However , we do not want roots cluttering up our local countryside .
Go west instead and team up with Mr Hoppity , the Welsh Turd

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Except for the fragile, tiny minds of Benedict Donald and his dutiful followers. Where words like (you don't have to follow illegal orders) and numbers (8647) are now punishable thought crimes. Not that the punishment comes from any laws mind you, or from a court. It's the expensive process of defending oneself against the vindictive selective prosecutions the MAGANUTS in charge continue to pursue.

meh...just the boomerang doing what it was conceived to do bro

 

[BlindBoo]

meh...just the boomerang doing what it was conceived to do bro

Nah. Charges usually don't come before an investigation or at the behest of a Presidential social media post. DOJ used to command dereference from the Courts. Now, the Corrupt Trump DOJ, because of so many missteps and misrepresentations, is viewed with suspicion by the courts. But the boomerang is coming soon.......

Jack Smith for AG in 2029.

 

[Captain Caveman]

How many times goes the profanity filter need covered

 

[Muhammed]

Ginger
Spice

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Nah. Charges usually don't come before an investigation or at the behest of a Presidential social media post. DOJ used to command dereference from the Courts. Now, the Corrupt Trump DOJ, because of so many missteps and misrepresentations, is viewed with suspicion by the courts.

just a symptom/side effect of a society that tries to lock up their political opponents

But the boomerang is coming soon.......

sure, it's the "lawfare effect" you just described above

Jack Smith for AG in 2029.

because he will lock up your political opponents

 

[Frankeneinstein]

But the boomerang is coming soon.......

Jack Smith for AG in 2029.

of course he is...gotta finish what he started

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Not only England but from the International Resort of Brighton , as I make clear in chapter seven of my profile .

When did your parents move there from Pakistan?

 

[BlindBoo]

just a symptom/side effect of a society that tries to lock up their political opponents

sure, it's the "lawfare effect" you just described above

because he will lock up your political opponents

The DOJ has been corrupted by Benedict Donald and the New Republicans new found faith in the unitary executive. If Democrats take that ball and run with it, who's to blame.

The lawfare you claim came from Biden was law and order coming for Benedict Donald's crimes surrounding the Jan 6th, 2021 attempt to over turn the valid election of 2020. Like the Majority Leader in the Senate said.

Mitch McConnell: (18:04)
"President Trump is still liable for everything he did while he was in office as an ordinary citizen. Unless the statute of limitations is run, still liable for everything he did while he was in office. Didn't get away with anything, yet. Yet. We have a criminal justice system in this country. We have civil litigation and former presidents are not immune from being accountable by either one."

Smith would take the case to trial and take his chances

 

[Frankeneinstein]

The DOJ has been corrupted by Benedict Donald and the New Republicans new found faith in the unitary executive. If Democrats take that ball and run with it, who's to blame.

The lawfare you claim came from Biden was law and order coming for Benedict Donald's crimes surrounding the Jan 6th, 2021 attempt to over turn the valid election of 2020. Like the Majority Leader in the Senate said.

Mitch McConnell: (18:04)
"President Trump is still liable for everything he did while he was in office as an ordinary citizen. Unless the statute of limitations is run, still liable for everything he did while he was in office. Didn't get away with anything, yet. Yet. We have a criminal justice system in this country. We have civil litigation and former presidents are not immune from being accountable by either one."

Smith would take the case to trial and take his chances

now your just trying to put some distance between your argument and the "lawfare" charade...ya want smith back so he can go after your political opponents and that is proof of where this tactic comes from.

 

[playtime]

& on USMB.

 

[BlindBoo]

now your just trying to put some distance between your argument and the "lawfare" charade...ya want smith back so he can go after your political opponents and that is proof of where this tactic comes from.

The only lawfare charade is the one made up by the New Republicans after they went, one by one to the Kings Castle and swore a new found fidelity to him. Garland was to timid to stray into that territory even if Biden ever publicly announced that he should indict Benedict. He really didn't need to, we all saw what happened that day.

 

[LibertyWeeps]

Banned words.........

Ban
Banned
Banning


NO, they DO NOT give warnings. They just cut you off with NO WARNINGS OF ANY KIND.

It's ok for their brownie lickers to use whatever words they want, but gawd forbid anybody they DON'T like use a "offensive" word........YOU ARE GONE!!!!

 

[Frankeneinstein]

The only lawfare charade is the one made up by the New Republicans after they went, one by one to the Kings Castle and swore a new found fidelity to him.

you are thinking of the european socialists who kissed his behind on the world stage and then fed him a kings feat and then the first lady of the franks sued the peasentry of her own country as is the way of the socialists

Garland was to timid to stray into that territory even if Biden ever publicly announced that he should indict Benedict. He really didn't need to, we all saw what happened that day.

not too timid...too honest, thats why ya need jack smith in "29"

 

[Dante]

& on USMB.

Ruined a good thread.

I've always detested that old fool.

 

[JoeB131]

I do notice that slang words referring to female genitalia are banned, but slang for male genitalia are not.

 

[MostBoringManInTheWorld]

I do notice that slang words referring to female genitalia are banned, but slang for male genitalia are not.

Yes, you can say cock, for instance.

Cockety cockety cockety cock.

But you can't say *****.

AKA, a word for a female dog. That's sexist!

 

[playtime]

Ruined a good thread.

apparently i diagree.

I've always detested that old fool.

does that really matter to me?

or care?