Bad News, Democrats

[PoliticalChic]

A good campaign strategy is for conservatives to repeat this fact over and over and use Venezuela as an example of socialism’s consequences.

And the Dems should just tell the truth.

They want to take your money and give it to other people in exchange for votes. They want big government so they are ruling over a more powerful government.

If Democrats could figure out a way to take 150% of your paycheck, they would do it.

"Like Father, Like Son – Obama’s Father: Government 100% Taxation of Income OK
October 27, 2008 by Editors


Investor’s Business Daily | Aug. 14, 2008

As a Nairobi bureaucrat, Barack Hussein Obama Sr. advised the pro-Western Kenyan government there to “redistribute” income through higher taxes. He also demonized corporations and called for massive government “investment” in social programs.

Writing in a 1965 scholarly paper, Obama’s late father slammed the administration of then-President Jomo Kenyatta for moving the Third World country away from socialism toward capitalism. He chafed at the idea of relying on private investors — who earn “dividends” on their venture capital — to develop the country’s fledgling economy.

“What is more important is to find means by which we can redistribute our economic gains to the benefit of all,” said the senior Obama, a Harvard-educated economist. “This is the government’s obligation.”

The “means” he had in mind were confiscatory taxes on a scale that redefines the term “progressive taxation.”

“Theoretically,” he wrote, “there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed.”

Therefore, he added, “I do not see why the government cannot tax those who have more and syphon some of these revenues into savings which can be utilized in investment for future development.”




NYTimes:
'But he did identify what he called “tactical lessons.” He let himself look too much like “the same old tax-and-spend liberal Democrat.”
The Education of President Obama

 

[ColonelAngus]

A good campaign strategy is for conservatives to repeat this fact over and over and use Venezuela as an example of socialism’s consequences.

And the Dems should just tell the truth.

They want to take your money and give it to other people in exchange for votes. They want big government so they are ruling over a more powerful government.

If Democrats could figure out a way to take 150% of your paycheck, they would do it.

"Like Father, Like Son – Obama’s Father: Government 100% Taxation of Income OK
October 27, 2008 by Editors


Investor’s Business Daily | Aug. 14, 2008

As a Nairobi bureaucrat, Barack Hussein Obama Sr. advised the pro-Western Kenyan government there to “redistribute” income through higher taxes. He also demonized corporations and called for massive government “investment” in social programs.

Writing in a 1965 scholarly paper, Obama’s late father slammed the administration of then-President Jomo Kenyatta for moving the Third World country away from socialism toward capitalism. He chafed at the idea of relying on private investors — who earn “dividends” on their venture capital — to develop the country’s fledgling economy.

“What is more important is to find means by which we can redistribute our economic gains to the benefit of all,” said the senior Obama, a Harvard-educated economist. “This is the government’s obligation.”

The “means” he had in mind were confiscatory taxes on a scale that redefines the term “progressive taxation.”

“Theoretically,” he wrote, “there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed.”

Therefore, he added, “I do not see why the government cannot tax those who have more and syphon some of these revenues into savings which can be utilized in investment for future development.”




NYTimes:
'But he did identify what he called “tactical lessons.” He let himself look too much like “the same old tax-and-spend liberal Democrat.”
The Education of President Obama

I knew it....and I didn’t even know about that specific anecdote.

The lib playbook is obvious for anyone willing to open their eyes and get past the social justice smokescreen.

 

[dudmuck]

A good campaign strategy is for conservatives to repeat this fact over and over and use Venezuela as an example of socialism’s consequences.

And the Dems should just tell the truth.

They want to take your money and give it to other people in exchange for votes. They want big government so they are ruling over a more powerful government.

If Democrats could figure out a way to take 150% of your paycheck, they would do it.

"Like Father, Like Son – Obama’s Father: Government 100% Taxation of Income OK
October 27, 2008 by Editors


Investor’s Business Daily | Aug. 14, 2008

As a Nairobi bureaucrat, Barack Hussein Obama Sr. advised the pro-Western Kenyan government there to “redistribute” income through higher taxes. He also demonized corporations and called for massive government “investment” in social programs.

Writing in a 1965 scholarly paper, Obama’s late father slammed the administration of then-President Jomo Kenyatta for moving the Third World country away from socialism toward capitalism. He chafed at the idea of relying on private investors — who earn “dividends” on their venture capital — to develop the country’s fledgling economy.

“What is more important is to find means by which we can redistribute our economic gains to the benefit of all,” said the senior Obama, a Harvard-educated economist. “This is the government’s obligation.”

The “means” he had in mind were confiscatory taxes on a scale that redefines the term “progressive taxation.”

“Theoretically,” he wrote, “there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed.”

Therefore, he added, “I do not see why the government cannot tax those who have more and syphon some of these revenues into savings which can be utilized in investment for future development.”




NYTimes:
'But he did identify what he called “tactical lessons.” He let himself look too much like “the same old tax-and-spend liberal Democrat.”
The Education of President Obama

Obama was raised by his grandparents and his mother. Obama barely even knew is father.

 

[PoliticalChic]

A good campaign strategy is for conservatives to repeat this fact over and over and use Venezuela as an example of socialism’s consequences.

And the Dems should just tell the truth.

They want to take your money and give it to other people in exchange for votes. They want big government so they are ruling over a more powerful government.

If Democrats could figure out a way to take 150% of your paycheck, they would do it.

"Like Father, Like Son – Obama’s Father: Government 100% Taxation of Income OK
October 27, 2008 by Editors


Investor’s Business Daily | Aug. 14, 2008

As a Nairobi bureaucrat, Barack Hussein Obama Sr. advised the pro-Western Kenyan government there to “redistribute” income through higher taxes. He also demonized corporations and called for massive government “investment” in social programs.

Writing in a 1965 scholarly paper, Obama’s late father slammed the administration of then-President Jomo Kenyatta for moving the Third World country away from socialism toward capitalism. He chafed at the idea of relying on private investors — who earn “dividends” on their venture capital — to develop the country’s fledgling economy.

“What is more important is to find means by which we can redistribute our economic gains to the benefit of all,” said the senior Obama, a Harvard-educated economist. “This is the government’s obligation.”

The “means” he had in mind were confiscatory taxes on a scale that redefines the term “progressive taxation.”

“Theoretically,” he wrote, “there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed.”

Therefore, he added, “I do not see why the government cannot tax those who have more and syphon some of these revenues into savings which can be utilized in investment for future development.”




NYTimes:
'But he did identify what he called “tactical lessons.” He let himself look too much like “the same old tax-and-spend liberal Democrat.”
The Education of President Obama

Obama was raised by his grandparents and his mother. Obama barely even knew is father.

Obama was a 'red diaper doper baby.'


His grandparent were dyed-in-the -wool communists.


No wonder you idolize that bunch.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The ideology and principles of the Founders have never changed. Reality forced them to postpone ending slavery, but the plan always existed.


It is interesting to note that the iniquity of the Democrats never changed, either.

Southern Democrat theoretician George Fitzhugh made an interesting admission about two related desires of the Democrats: Slavery and Socialism.



" What society needed was slavery, not just for blacks, but for whites as well. "Slavery," "is a form, and the very best form, of socialism."

"Socialism," Proposes to do away with free competition; to afford protection and support at all times to the laboring class; to bring about, at least, a qualified community of property, and to associate labor. All these purposes, slavery fully land perfectly attains. [...] Socialism is already slavery in all save the master... Our only quarrel with Socialism is, that it will not honestly admit that it owes its recent revival to the failure of universal liberty, and is seeking to bring about slavery again in some form.” Fitzhugh, George (1854 Sociology for the South, p. 48)


And, they remain, the party of slavery and of socialism.

 

[dudmuck]

A good campaign strategy is for conservatives to repeat this fact over and over and use Venezuela as an example of socialism’s consequences.

And the Dems should just tell the truth.

They want to take your money and give it to other people in exchange for votes. They want big government so they are ruling over a more powerful government.

If Democrats could figure out a way to take 150% of your paycheck, they would do it.

"Like Father, Like Son – Obama’s Father: Government 100% Taxation of Income OK
October 27, 2008 by Editors


Investor’s Business Daily | Aug. 14, 2008

As a Nairobi bureaucrat, Barack Hussein Obama Sr. advised the pro-Western Kenyan government there to “redistribute” income through higher taxes. He also demonized corporations and called for massive government “investment” in social programs.

Writing in a 1965 scholarly paper, Obama’s late father slammed the administration of then-President Jomo Kenyatta for moving the Third World country away from socialism toward capitalism. He chafed at the idea of relying on private investors — who earn “dividends” on their venture capital — to develop the country’s fledgling economy.

“What is more important is to find means by which we can redistribute our economic gains to the benefit of all,” said the senior Obama, a Harvard-educated economist. “This is the government’s obligation.”

The “means” he had in mind were confiscatory taxes on a scale that redefines the term “progressive taxation.”

“Theoretically,” he wrote, “there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed.”

Therefore, he added, “I do not see why the government cannot tax those who have more and syphon some of these revenues into savings which can be utilized in investment for future development.”




NYTimes:
'But he did identify what he called “tactical lessons.” He let himself look too much like “the same old tax-and-spend liberal Democrat.”
The Education of President Obama

Obama was raised by his grandparents and his mother. Obama barely even knew is father.

Obama was a 'red diaper doper baby.'


His grandparent were dyed-in-the -wool communists.


No wonder you idolize that bunch.

Stanley Armour Dunham was a communist? Any evidence of this?

Obama's is the worst communist ever.
Obama had said "it is important to remember that capitalism has been the greatest driver of prosperity and opportunity the world has ever seen."

Although he recognizes the massive inequality we've produced in recent decades, he's really not all that different than Elizabeth Warren in that regard.

 

[PoliticalChic]

A good campaign strategy is for conservatives to repeat this fact over and over and use Venezuela as an example of socialism’s consequences.

And the Dems should just tell the truth.

They want to take your money and give it to other people in exchange for votes. They want big government so they are ruling over a more powerful government.

If Democrats could figure out a way to take 150% of your paycheck, they would do it.

"Like Father, Like Son – Obama’s Father: Government 100% Taxation of Income OK
October 27, 2008 by Editors


Investor’s Business Daily | Aug. 14, 2008

As a Nairobi bureaucrat, Barack Hussein Obama Sr. advised the pro-Western Kenyan government there to “redistribute” income through higher taxes. He also demonized corporations and called for massive government “investment” in social programs.

Writing in a 1965 scholarly paper, Obama’s late father slammed the administration of then-President Jomo Kenyatta for moving the Third World country away from socialism toward capitalism. He chafed at the idea of relying on private investors — who earn “dividends” on their venture capital — to develop the country’s fledgling economy.

“What is more important is to find means by which we can redistribute our economic gains to the benefit of all,” said the senior Obama, a Harvard-educated economist. “This is the government’s obligation.”

The “means” he had in mind were confiscatory taxes on a scale that redefines the term “progressive taxation.”

“Theoretically,” he wrote, “there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed.”

Therefore, he added, “I do not see why the government cannot tax those who have more and syphon some of these revenues into savings which can be utilized in investment for future development.”




NYTimes:
'But he did identify what he called “tactical lessons.” He let himself look too much like “the same old tax-and-spend liberal Democrat.”
The Education of President Obama

Obama was raised by his grandparents and his mother. Obama barely even knew is father.

Obama was a 'red diaper doper baby.'


His grandparent were dyed-in-the -wool communists.


No wonder you idolize that bunch.

Stanley Armour Dunham was a communist? Any evidence of this?

Obama's is the worst communist ever.
Obama had said "it is important to remember that capitalism has been the greatest driver of prosperity and opportunity the world has ever seen."

Although he recognizes the massive inequality we've produced in recent decades, he's really not all that different than Elizabeth Warren in that regard.

Although I cannot empathize with it, I completely understand your situation
You were motivated to respond because my post runs counter to everything they 'taught' you in government schools
But that same schooling leaves you woefully unprepared to counter, other than 'is not.'
Heaven forbid you actually went out and did your own research, or investigated the links/sources that I have provided.
You might lose your Liberal credentials.


I said:
Obama was a 'red diaper doper baby.'
His grandparent were dyed-in-the -wool communists.

You said:
Any evidence of this?



I should keep you on retainer, you dunce, as you always prove me correct....


a. Stanley and Madelyn Dunham in 1955 picked up and relocated 2,000 miles from Texas to Seattle. The next year they relocated to Mercer Island specifically so their daughter, Obama's future mother Stanley Ann Dunham could attend Mercer Island High School. Another attraction: The East Shore Unitarian Church, also a hotbed of leftist activism.


One year earlier, Mercer Island schools had distinguished themselves in a way which might have caused others to avoid them. The Chicago Tribune explains,


"In 1955, the chairman of the Mercer Island school board, John Stenhouse, testified before the House Un-American Activities Subcommittee that he had been a member of the Communist Party." http://www.valfoubert.com/Strong Personalities Shaped a Future Senator.pdf



b. The Chicago Tribune mentions a description of the Dunham's chosen church as "The Little Red Church on the Hill". According to its own website, East Shore Unitarian Church got that name because of, "Well-publicized debates and forums on such controversial subjects as the admission of ‘Red China' to the United Nations...." Mercer Island's John Stenhouse, according to his 2000 obituary, once served as church president possibly contributing to the ‘red' label.


The Dunhams moved to Honolulu in 1960 after Ann graduated and quickly became friends with leftists such as now-Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-HI) and Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis. Obama's mother-to-be enrolled at the University of Hawaii and soon met Barack Obama Sr. in a Russian language class. She would remain affiliated with the University for most of her life. The Unitarian Church and Obama's Religious Upbringing





Barack Obama: Red Diaper Baby




Get this straight: I am never wrong.
I publish truth with the diligence of a UN translator.

 

[dudmuck]

A good campaign strategy is for conservatives to repeat this fact over and over and use Venezuela as an example of socialism’s consequences.

And the Dems should just tell the truth.

They want to take your money and give it to other people in exchange for votes. They want big government so they are ruling over a more powerful government.

If Democrats could figure out a way to take 150% of your paycheck, they would do it.

"Like Father, Like Son – Obama’s Father: Government 100% Taxation of Income OK
October 27, 2008 by Editors


Investor’s Business Daily | Aug. 14, 2008

As a Nairobi bureaucrat, Barack Hussein Obama Sr. advised the pro-Western Kenyan government there to “redistribute” income through higher taxes. He also demonized corporations and called for massive government “investment” in social programs.

Writing in a 1965 scholarly paper, Obama’s late father slammed the administration of then-President Jomo Kenyatta for moving the Third World country away from socialism toward capitalism. He chafed at the idea of relying on private investors — who earn “dividends” on their venture capital — to develop the country’s fledgling economy.

“What is more important is to find means by which we can redistribute our economic gains to the benefit of all,” said the senior Obama, a Harvard-educated economist. “This is the government’s obligation.”

The “means” he had in mind were confiscatory taxes on a scale that redefines the term “progressive taxation.”

“Theoretically,” he wrote, “there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed.”

Therefore, he added, “I do not see why the government cannot tax those who have more and syphon some of these revenues into savings which can be utilized in investment for future development.”




NYTimes:
'But he did identify what he called “tactical lessons.” He let himself look too much like “the same old tax-and-spend liberal Democrat.”
The Education of President Obama

Obama was raised by his grandparents and his mother. Obama barely even knew is father.

Obama was a 'red diaper doper baby.'


His grandparent were dyed-in-the -wool communists.


No wonder you idolize that bunch.

Stanley Armour Dunham was a communist? Any evidence of this?

Obama's is the worst communist ever.
Obama had said "it is important to remember that capitalism has been the greatest driver of prosperity and opportunity the world has ever seen."

Although he recognizes the massive inequality we've produced in recent decades, he's really not all that different than Elizabeth Warren in that regard.

Although I cannot empathize with it, I completely understand your situation
You were motivated to respond because my post runs counter to everything they 'taught' you in government schools
But that same schooling leaves you woefully unprepared to counter, other than 'is not.'
Heaven forbid you actually went out and did your own research, or investigated the links/sources that I have provided.
You might lose your Liberal credentials.


I said:
Obama was a 'red diaper doper baby.'
His grandparent were dyed-in-the -wool communists.

You said:
Any evidence of this?



I should keep you on retainer, you dunce, as you always prove me correct....


a. Stanley and Madelyn Dunham in 1955 picked up and relocated 2,000 miles from Texas to Seattle. The next year they relocated to Mercer Island specifically so their daughter, Obama's future mother Stanley Ann Dunham could attend Mercer Island High School. Another attraction: The East Shore Unitarian Church, also a hotbed of leftist activism.


One year earlier, Mercer Island schools had distinguished themselves in a way which might have caused others to avoid them. The Chicago Tribune explains,


"In 1955, the chairman of the Mercer Island school board, John Stenhouse, testified before the House Un-American Activities Subcommittee that he had been a member of the Communist Party." http://www.valfoubert.com/Strong Personalities Shaped a Future Senator.pdf



b. The Chicago Tribune mentions a description of the Dunham's chosen church as "The Little Red Church on the Hill". According to its own website, East Shore Unitarian Church got that name because of, "Well-publicized debates and forums on such controversial subjects as the admission of ‘Red China' to the United Nations...." Mercer Island's John Stenhouse, according to his 2000 obituary, once served as church president possibly contributing to the ‘red' label.


The Dunhams moved to Honolulu in 1960 after Ann graduated and quickly became friends with leftists such as now-Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-HI) and Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis. Obama's mother-to-be enrolled at the University of Hawaii and soon met Barack Obama Sr. in a Russian language class. She would remain affiliated with the University for most of her life. The Unitarian Church and Obama's Religious Upbringing





Barack Obama: Red Diaper Baby




Get this straight: I am never wrong.
I publish truth with the diligence of a UN translator.

Seriously? American Thinker? far right bias, factual reporting: mixed.
And this from people who say, better Russian than democrat.

Stock market did better under Obama: worlds worst communist.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Like Father, Like Son – Obama’s Father: Government 100% Taxation of Income OK
October 27, 2008 by Editors


Investor’s Business Daily | Aug. 14, 2008

As a Nairobi bureaucrat, Barack Hussein Obama Sr. advised the pro-Western Kenyan government there to “redistribute” income through higher taxes. He also demonized corporations and called for massive government “investment” in social programs.

Writing in a 1965 scholarly paper, Obama’s late father slammed the administration of then-President Jomo Kenyatta for moving the Third World country away from socialism toward capitalism. He chafed at the idea of relying on private investors — who earn “dividends” on their venture capital — to develop the country’s fledgling economy.

“What is more important is to find means by which we can redistribute our economic gains to the benefit of all,” said the senior Obama, a Harvard-educated economist. “This is the government’s obligation.”

The “means” he had in mind were confiscatory taxes on a scale that redefines the term “progressive taxation.”

“Theoretically,” he wrote, “there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed.”

Therefore, he added, “I do not see why the government cannot tax those who have more and syphon some of these revenues into savings which can be utilized in investment for future development.”




NYTimes:
'But he did identify what he called “tactical lessons.” He let himself look too much like “the same old tax-and-spend liberal Democrat.”
The Education of President Obama

Obama was raised by his grandparents and his mother. Obama barely even knew is father.

Obama was a 'red diaper doper baby.'


His grandparent were dyed-in-the -wool communists.


No wonder you idolize that bunch.

Stanley Armour Dunham was a communist? Any evidence of this?

Obama's is the worst communist ever.
Obama had said "it is important to remember that capitalism has been the greatest driver of prosperity and opportunity the world has ever seen."

Although he recognizes the massive inequality we've produced in recent decades, he's really not all that different than Elizabeth Warren in that regard.

Although I cannot empathize with it, I completely understand your situation
You were motivated to respond because my post runs counter to everything they 'taught' you in government schools
But that same schooling leaves you woefully unprepared to counter, other than 'is not.'
Heaven forbid you actually went out and did your own research, or investigated the links/sources that I have provided.
You might lose your Liberal credentials.


I said:
Obama was a 'red diaper doper baby.'
His grandparent were dyed-in-the -wool communists.

You said:
Any evidence of this?



I should keep you on retainer, you dunce, as you always prove me correct....


a. Stanley and Madelyn Dunham in 1955 picked up and relocated 2,000 miles from Texas to Seattle. The next year they relocated to Mercer Island specifically so their daughter, Obama's future mother Stanley Ann Dunham could attend Mercer Island High School. Another attraction: The East Shore Unitarian Church, also a hotbed of leftist activism.


One year earlier, Mercer Island schools had distinguished themselves in a way which might have caused others to avoid them. The Chicago Tribune explains,


"In 1955, the chairman of the Mercer Island school board, John Stenhouse, testified before the House Un-American Activities Subcommittee that he had been a member of the Communist Party." http://www.valfoubert.com/Strong Personalities Shaped a Future Senator.pdf



b. The Chicago Tribune mentions a description of the Dunham's chosen church as "The Little Red Church on the Hill". According to its own website, East Shore Unitarian Church got that name because of, "Well-publicized debates and forums on such controversial subjects as the admission of ‘Red China' to the United Nations...." Mercer Island's John Stenhouse, according to his 2000 obituary, once served as church president possibly contributing to the ‘red' label.


The Dunhams moved to Honolulu in 1960 after Ann graduated and quickly became friends with leftists such as now-Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-HI) and Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis. Obama's mother-to-be enrolled at the University of Hawaii and soon met Barack Obama Sr. in a Russian language class. She would remain affiliated with the University for most of her life. The Unitarian Church and Obama's Religious Upbringing





Barack Obama: Red Diaper Baby




Get this straight: I am never wrong.
I publish truth with the diligence of a UN translator.

Seriously? American Thinker? far right bias, factual reporting: mixed.
And this from people who say, better Russian than democrat.

Stock market did better under Obama: worlds worst communist.

Very good: a government school gold star for you!

You were taught to deny the facts if they didn't come from a Leftist source.


There is an ancient saying that has moment, here, in this discussion. It applies to my teaching you: "A fool, though in the company of the wise, understands nothing of the doctrine being discussed, as a spoon tastes not the flavor of the soup."



Now, get lost.

 

[grainbely]

I am never wrong.

This is more so a sign of a mental condition than anything.

Here's what it would take for me to believe your weekly fabricated crackpot theory. Show me the plans, quotes, paper trail, digital fingerprint reinforcing that democrats now want slavery. Myself and my generation tend to not want that according to the common american historical context.

I feel I need to remind you that Socialism vs. Capitalism is not a binary system. I'm perplexed at how so many have been convinced that it is. In actuality, any policy, individual, group, or party cumulatively will exist on a spectrum between the two. A policy or two may be out on the edge either way or anywhere in between. A collection of policies will average out somewhere in the middle. It would be the rhetoric if anything that would display a solid yes or no perspective on socialism.

Democrats seem to be more concerned and aware of the deficiencies of capitalism. Since your quote from 1854(kek), we have seen numerous examples of the failings or weaknesses of capitalism. It's still a net positive and cornerstone of our society. There is no better motivation in living organisms than competition for scarce resources. Survival is #1, and 1a is procreation which is still survival but of the hereditary line. Humans are no exception and even takes competition further with our ingenious and collaborative capabilities. But where capitalism fails is where we are looking at a broader range of solutions including those that are more socialist. There tends to be perennial problems that the implemented form of capitalism isnt now and wont resolve. In those situations, why not expand the possible solution set? Even just at a state level on some things, there is good reason to review the system, identify problems, discuss and try different solutions. If you consider the american economy as a single unit, then making some system adjustments to ensure the machine keeps running is competitive on the international scale.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I am never wrong.

This is more so a sign of a mental condition than anything.

Here's what it would take for me to believe your weekly fabricated crackpot theory. Show me the plans, quotes, paper trail, digital fingerprint reinforcing that democrats now want slavery. Myself and my generation tend to not want that according to the common american historical context.

I feel I need to remind you that Socialism vs. Capitalism is not a binary system. I'm perplexed at how so many have been convinced that it is. In actuality, any policy, individual, group, or party cumulatively will exist on a spectrum between the two. A policy or two may be out on the edge either way or anywhere in between. A collection of policies will average out somewhere in the middle. It would be the rhetoric if anything that would display a solid yes or no perspective on socialism.

Democrats seem to be more concerned and aware of the deficiencies of capitalism. Since your quote from 1854(kek), we have seen numerous examples of the failings or weaknesses of capitalism. It's still a net positive and cornerstone of our society. There is no better motivation in living organisms than competition for scarce resources. Survival is #1, and 1a is procreation which is still survival but of the hereditary line. Humans are no exception and even takes competition further with our ingenious and collaborative capabilities. But where capitalism fails is where we are looking at a broader range of solutions including those that are more socialist. There tends to be perennial problems that the implemented form of capitalism isnt now and wont resolve. In those situations, why not expand the possible solution set? Even just at a state level on some things, there is good reason to review the system, identify problems, discuss and try different solutions. If you consider the american economy as a single unit, then making some system adjustments to ensure the machine keeps running is competitive on the international scale.

You just proved that I am never wrong, you dunce.

 

[Two Thumbs]

Wilson was elected President in 1912

so it only took them 106 years to admit the truth.


They started to admit it earlier, referring to the base as progressive and not liberal.

soon with will be socialists versus conservatives in a never ending fight to save the Republic.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Wilson was elected President in 1912

so it only took them 106 years to admit the truth.


They started to admit it earlier, referring to the base as progressive and not liberal.

soon with will be socialists versus conservatives in a never ending fight to save the Republic.

To win, we must take back the schools.

 

[Two Thumbs]

Wilson was elected President in 1912

so it only took them 106 years to admit the truth.


They started to admit it earlier, referring to the base as progressive and not liberal.

soon with will be socialists versus conservatives in a never ending fight to save the Republic.

To win, we must take back the schools.

easy, eliminate the dept of ed

before it, America ranked in the top 5, since it we barely rank.

so clearly it's a money hole.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Wilson was elected President in 1912

so it only took them 106 years to admit the truth.


They started to admit it earlier, referring to the base as progressive and not liberal.

soon with will be socialists versus conservatives in a never ending fight to save the Republic.

To win, we must take back the schools.

easy, eliminate the dept of ed

before it, America ranked in the top 5, since it we barely rank.

so clearly it's a money hole.

It's far worse than that, TT....

"The California Federation of Teachers (CFT) passed a resolution at its most recent convention claiming that “the continued unjust incarceration of Mumia Abu-Jamal represents a threat to the civil rights of all people.” Thirty years ago, Abu-Jamal took away Philadelphia policeman Daniel Faulkner’s foremost civil right: his life. How obtuse of the CFT to disregard “the threat to the civil rights of all people” represented by someone capable of gunning down a man tasked with protecting the public.

The pantheon of leftist saints includes the Haymarket Square bombers, responsible for the deaths of eight Chicago cops, Joe Hill, murderer of former police officer John Morrison in Salt Lake City, Huey Newton, murderer of Oakland policeman John Frey, and Leonard Peltier, murderer of FBI agents Jack Coler and Ronald Williams. Notice a pattern?"
Teachers' Mumia Abu-Jamal Resolution Out of Sync Morally and Historically | Human Events




"English prof assigns Trump-bashing books in rhetoric course"
English prof assigns Trump-bashing books in rhetoric course

 

[Two Thumbs]

Wilson was elected President in 1912

so it only took them 106 years to admit the truth.


They started to admit it earlier, referring to the base as progressive and not liberal.

soon with will be socialists versus conservatives in a never ending fight to save the Republic.

To win, we must take back the schools.

easy, eliminate the dept of ed

before it, America ranked in the top 5, since it we barely rank.

so clearly it's a money hole.

It's far worse than that, TT....

"The California Federation of Teachers (CFT) passed a resolution at its most recent convention claiming that “the continued unjust incarceration of Mumia Abu-Jamal represents a threat to the civil rights of all people.” Thirty years ago, Abu-Jamal took away Philadelphia policeman Daniel Faulkner’s foremost civil right: his life. How obtuse of the CFT to disregard “the threat to the civil rights of all people” represented by someone capable of gunning down a man tasked with protecting the public.

The pantheon of leftist saints includes the Haymarket Square bombers, responsible for the deaths of eight Chicago cops, Joe Hill, murderer of former police officer John Morrison in Salt Lake City, Huey Newton, murderer of Oakland policeman John Frey, and Leonard Peltier, murderer of FBI agents Jack Coler and Ronald Williams. Notice a pattern?"
Teachers' Mumia Abu-Jamal Resolution Out of Sync Morally and Historically | Human Events




"English prof assigns Trump-bashing books in rhetoric course"
English prof assigns Trump-bashing books in rhetoric course

I lived in Philly during one of the idiotic protests to get him freed. Most of the radio stations stayed silent or gave their support, except one, they openly mocked the protesters, mocked their faked facts and all the sigs, they did such a diligent job that his widow called in to thank them for their efforts. she relived this story for them;

When ever they showed my husbands bloody shirt he (mumia) would turn and smile at me and my family, mocking us, making us relive the pain over and over.




mumia needs to be taken out to sea and given a pardon and a short swimming lesson.

 

[Deno]

Actually the good news is republicans are beginning to admit they love young girls and taking away freedom by bankrupting the citizens of America.

Bankrupting American citizen's was Obama's goal. Not the republican's.

Replacing the American electorate with a more.....malleable .....assortment was the goal.

Hillary aide Jennifer Palmieri admitted it...


"A secret strategy memo from the Left’s most influential think tank warns that Democrats face electoral oblivion unless they immediately double-down on their support for the young illegal immigrants known as the DREAMers.

DREAMers are a “critical component of the Democratic Party’s future electoral success,” according to the memo dated Jan. 8.

Shielding DACA beneficiaries from enforced removal is so important to the left-wing agenda that Democrats have to “refuse to offer any votes for Republican spending bills that do not offer a fix for Dreamers and instead appropriate funds to deport them.”

“The fight to protect Dreamers is not only a moral imperative, it is also a critical component of the Democratic Party’s future electoral success,” states Palmieri’s memo.

“If Democrats don’t try to do everything in their power to defend Dreamers, that will jeopardize Democrats’ electoral chances in 2018 and beyond,” the memo states. “In short, the next few weeks will tell us a lot about the Democratic Party and its long-term electoral prospects.”


…they tend to be underachievers, less educated and less established than typical Americans.

According to the nonpartisan Center for Immigration Studies, about 24 percent of DREAMers are functionally illiterate and 46 percent possess only “basic” English ability. Only 49 percent have a high school diploma, even though a majority are now adults.”
Democrats Must Embrace DREAMers or Face Doom, Says Secret Left-Wing Memo




That's why Hussein told illegals to go and vote.

Your post is on the money….But…

I think this will all backfire on the libtards in the long run.

I have had a lot of interaction with Mexican contractors.

My next door neighbor is Mexican and he owns three successful restaurants………

I know a guy that snuck across the border and now owns his

own company and he is a contractor for the company I work for.

Most are very hard working decent people…………..

It’s unreal how many start their own businesses……

It’s like the old adage that if your not a liberal when you are young,

you have no heart. If you aren’t a Republican when you are old

you have no brain……

I think the vast majority of Mexicans will end up on the Right side of things……….

 

[PoliticalChic]

Actually the good news is republicans are beginning to admit they love young girls and taking away freedom by bankrupting the citizens of America.

Bankrupting American citizen's was Obama's goal. Not the republican's.

Replacing the American electorate with a more.....malleable .....assortment was the goal.

Hillary aide Jennifer Palmieri admitted it...


"A secret strategy memo from the Left’s most influential think tank warns that Democrats face electoral oblivion unless they immediately double-down on their support for the young illegal immigrants known as the DREAMers.

DREAMers are a “critical component of the Democratic Party’s future electoral success,” according to the memo dated Jan. 8.

Shielding DACA beneficiaries from enforced removal is so important to the left-wing agenda that Democrats have to “refuse to offer any votes for Republican spending bills that do not offer a fix for Dreamers and instead appropriate funds to deport them.”

“The fight to protect Dreamers is not only a moral imperative, it is also a critical component of the Democratic Party’s future electoral success,” states Palmieri’s memo.

“If Democrats don’t try to do everything in their power to defend Dreamers, that will jeopardize Democrats’ electoral chances in 2018 and beyond,” the memo states. “In short, the next few weeks will tell us a lot about the Democratic Party and its long-term electoral prospects.”


…they tend to be underachievers, less educated and less established than typical Americans.

According to the nonpartisan Center for Immigration Studies, about 24 percent of DREAMers are functionally illiterate and 46 percent possess only “basic” English ability. Only 49 percent have a high school diploma, even though a majority are now adults.”
Democrats Must Embrace DREAMers or Face Doom, Says Secret Left-Wing Memo




That's why Hussein told illegals to go and vote.

Your post is on the money….But…

I think this will all backfire on the libtards in the long run.

I have had a lot of interaction with Mexican contractors.

My next door neighbor is Mexican and he owns three successful restaurants………

I know a guy that snuck across the border and now owns his

own company and he is a contractor for the company I work for.

Most are very hard working decent people…………..

It’s unreal how many start their own businesses……

It’s like the old adage that if your not a liberal when you are young,

you have no heart. If you aren’t a Republican when you are old

you have no brain……

I think the vast majority of Mexicans will end up on the Right side of things……….

I agree, and sure hope we're right.


I have faith in Divine Providence, as the Declaration of Independence puts it.

 

[BlueGin]

Actually the good news is republicans are beginning to admit they love young girls and taking away freedom by bankrupting the citizens of America.

Bankrupting American citizen's was Obama's goal. Not the republican's.

Replacing the American electorate with a more.....malleable .....assortment was the goal.

Hillary aide Jennifer Palmieri admitted it...


"A secret strategy memo from the Left’s most influential think tank warns that Democrats face electoral oblivion unless they immediately double-down on their support for the young illegal immigrants known as the DREAMers.

DREAMers are a “critical component of the Democratic Party’s future electoral success,” according to the memo dated Jan. 8.

Shielding DACA beneficiaries from enforced removal is so important to the left-wing agenda that Democrats have to “refuse to offer any votes for Republican spending bills that do not offer a fix for Dreamers and instead appropriate funds to deport them.”

“The fight to protect Dreamers is not only a moral imperative, it is also a critical component of the Democratic Party’s future electoral success,” states Palmieri’s memo.

“If Democrats don’t try to do everything in their power to defend Dreamers, that will jeopardize Democrats’ electoral chances in 2018 and beyond,” the memo states. “In short, the next few weeks will tell us a lot about the Democratic Party and its long-term electoral prospects.”


…they tend to be underachievers, less educated and less established than typical Americans.

According to the nonpartisan Center for Immigration Studies, about 24 percent of DREAMers are functionally illiterate and 46 percent possess only “basic” English ability. Only 49 percent have a high school diploma, even though a majority are now adults.”
Democrats Must Embrace DREAMers or Face Doom, Says Secret Left-Wing Memo




That's why Hussein told illegals to go and vote.

Your post is on the money….But…

I think this will all backfire on the libtards in the long run.

I have had a lot of interaction with Mexican contractors.

My next door neighbor is Mexican and he owns three successful restaurants………

I know a guy that snuck across the border and now owns his

own company and he is a contractor for the company I work for.

Most are very hard working decent people…………..

It’s unreal how many start their own businesses……

It’s like the old adage that if your not a liberal when you are young,

you have no heart. If you aren’t a Republican when you are old

you have no brain……

I think the vast majority of Mexicans will end up on the Right side of things……….

A lot of Mexican's are staunch Catholic's. So I wouldn't be surprised if a lot end up on the right.

 

[bodecea]

If you've been paying attention, you've seen the Democrat Party actually admitting that it is the Socialist Party...

1. "MARXISTS AND EXTREME RADICALS SEEK TO TAKE OVER THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY

• DNC chairman Tom Perez said Democratic Socialists of America member Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez “represents the future of our party.”
• DSA chapter chairs have agreed that “communism is good.”
• One DSA caucus calls its members “revolutionary Marxists.” "MARXISTS AND EXTREME RADICALS SEEK TO TAKE OVER THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY

Marxists And Extreme Radicals Seek To Take Over The Democratic Party





2. And, about darned time.....'cause their voters have admitted it...

POLL: Democrats More Positive About Socialism Than Capitalism

Posted by Kemberlee Kaye Monday, August 13, 2018 at 7:00pm
Only 47% of Democrats view capitalism positively

A new poll released by Gallup shows that for the first time in over a decade, Democrats are more passionate about socialism, viewing it more positively than capitalism."


Republicans are still heavily enamored with capitalism, with no noticeable change since polling conducted in 2010.

Notably, only 47% of Democrats view capitalism positively, a drop of 9 points (from 56%) in only two years.
POLL: Democrats More Positive About Socialism Than Capitalism




3. That's what Democrats say.
Here's what Americans say:

"Poll: Most Americans unwilling to vote for a socialist
Americans say they are more likely to support an atheist than a socialist for president next year, according to the latest Gallup survey, released Monday.

Just 47 percent of Americans would vote for a socialist if their party nominated one, while 50 percent said they would not, while 58 percent said they would have no problem voting for an atheist in their party.


Independent Bernie Sanders is the only self-described “democratic socialist” in the race, though he’s running as a Democrat. "
Poll: Most Americans unwilling to vote for a socialist



And, more recently:

"Winning the Midterms Messaging Battle - Poll Says 76% Reject “Socialist” Candidates

Democrats that run as a Democratic Socialist outside of very deep blue district may want to heed the warning of a poll conducted by The Hill and Harris. Link to The Hill Article.The results of this poll show that 76% of those polled would not vote for a socialist candidate. Guess what, Republicans are now using that word in every district to brand their Democratic opponent no matter how moderate their positions might actually be.

Democrats need to get out in front of Republican’s socialist labeling quickly and counter it with something people can line up behind. The media will have a field day prodding Democratic candidates if they are a socialist in every interview. There will be a broad brush used to confuse the public and conflate the progressive Democrats brand as Socialist. Having to explain and defend takes valuable time and energy.

This really is the only play Republicans have. Democrats, be proactive and take it away from them now.
Winning the Midterms Messaging Battle - Poll Says 76% Reject “Socialist” Candidates



Get that?

Kos is telling the Democrats that have to lie.

But....that's what they do already.

Your screeds are priceless. Ocasio-Cortez was the PERFECT candidate for The Bronx where Ds outnumber Rs 5-1. She'd be horrible in a purple district. There is no such thing as a one size fits all Dem (or any other) candidate.

So kindly shove your Daily Caller generalizations where the sun don't shine.

Screeds? A polite term for mindless "cut n' paste"?