Bachmann signs The Family Lead pledge

[Jarhead]

Don't listen to these partisan fuckwits. You didn't interpret anything incorrectly. Child porn is already illegal and no politicians anywhere are advocating for legalization. There'd be no need for any pledge about that whatsoever. That part of the pledge is definitely about supporting legislation that greatly restricts, if not outright bans "all forms of pornography" which as elvis pointed out, they didn't bother to define.

protection FROM....not banning it

Right now, there is no LEGAL protection from our children being exposed to pornography.
Yes, it is illegal to seel it to a minor....but it is not illegal for one to post it on the internet for a minor to easily see.

Personally, I disagree with her...let that be the job of the parents....but I will not sit by and allow you folks to intentionally misinterpret what she swore to.

Such spin is one of the reasons there is such a divide in America.

Jeez...stop the freaking game playing. It gets us nowhere as our politicians live the lives and and then the retirements of Riley.

Ok, so maybe she only wants to ban it from the internet.

over my dead body she will!

 

[Modbert]

confusion? oh hell no, red meat ? oh hell yeah. think progress is an advocacy site pure and simple, there are same- right left center......he took their headlines snippets and went with it, reading it the actual pledge becomes a simple lesson in comprehension, even when you hit the links, you get sent to think progress LBGT which mischaracterizes the vow, and the simple Iowa caucus's site that says she signed it.

What? There is no difference between the complete vow that TP posted on their website and the one from the Iowa caucus site. The same TP link I posted in my 2nd post in this thread.

 

[L.K.Eder]

protection FROM....not banning it

Right now, there is no LEGAL protection from our children being exposed to pornography.
Yes, it is illegal to seel it to a minor....but it is not illegal for one to post it on the internet for a minor to easily see.

Personally, I disagree with her...let that be the job of the parents....but I will not sit by and allow you folks to intentionally misinterpret what she swore to.

Such spin is one of the reasons there is such a divide in America.

Jeez...stop the freaking game playing. It gets us nowhere as our politicians live the lives and and then the retirements of Riley.

how does a presidential candidate, in any elected or appointed capacity by which he or she may have the honor of serving her or his fellow citizens in these United States, accomplish said protection?

huh?

The same way any candidate accomplishes half the promises they make.
Didnt Obama promise to close GITMO?

Promsising or swearing to do all they can does not mean they will accomplish it.

that is not even an attempt.

of course they will have to go the legislative route.

unless you think the candidates will act as bodyguards who personally protect the vulnerable women and children.

 

[Jarhead]

protection FROM....not banning it

Right now, there is no LEGAL protection from our children being exposed to pornography.
Yes, it is illegal to seel it to a minor....but it is not illegal for one to post it on the internet for a minor to easily see.

Personally, I disagree with her...let that be the job of the parents....but I will not sit by and allow you folks to intentionally misinterpret what she swore to.

Such spin is one of the reasons there is such a divide in America.

Jeez...stop the freaking game playing. It gets us nowhere as our politicians live the lives and and then the retirements of Riley.

Ok, so maybe she only wants to ban it from the internet.

over my dead body she will!

more appropriately...

Over my LIMP body she will!

 

[Trajan]

confusion? oh hell no, red meat ? oh hell yeah. think progress is an advocacy site pure and simple, there are same- right left center......he took their headlines snippets and went with it, reading it the actual pledge becomes a simple lesson in comprehension, even when you hit the links, you get sent to think progress LBGT which mischaracterizes the vow, and the simple Iowa caucus's site that says she signed it.

so when you read books, you always read the footnotes?

its not in the footnotes and the answer is yes btw. did you read vow 9 ?



Humane protection of woman and the innocent fruit of conjugal intimacy-
our next generation of American children- from human trafficking, sexual slavery, seduction into promiscuity, and all forms of pornography and prostitution, infanticide, abortion and other types of coercion or stolen innocence.



I pledge humane protection of the hummingbirds in my yard....

 

[Jarhead]

how does a presidential candidate, in any elected or appointed capacity by which he or she may have the honor of serving her or his fellow citizens in these United States, accomplish said protection?

huh?

The same way any candidate accomplishes half the promises they make.
Didnt Obama promise to close GITMO?

Promsising or swearing to do all they can does not mean they will accomplish it.

that is not even an attempt.

of course they will have to go the legislative route.

unless you think the candidates will act as bodyguards who personally protect the vulnerable women and children.

95% (made up number) of political campaign promises will only be met through the legislative process.....

She can promise and sweear all she wants....

Candidates make those promises to define their agenda.

 

[driveby]

Should Think Progress be shut down for lying?

Lying to promote their propaganda is a virtue to these people........

 

[Trajan]

confusion? oh hell no, red meat ? oh hell yeah. think progress is an advocacy site pure and simple, there are same- right left center......he took their headlines snippets and went with it, reading it the actual pledge becomes a simple lesson in comprehension, even when you hit the links, you get sent to think progress LBGT which mischaracterizes the vow, and the simple Iowa caucus's site that says she signed it.

What? There is no difference between the complete vow that TP posted on their website and the one from the Iowa caucus site. The same TP link I posted in my 2nd post in this thread.

The ninth step calls for the banning of “all forms” of pornography. The pledge also states that homosexuality is both a choice and a health risk. You can read all the details of the pledge here.



that is what you posted IN your OP, you then have to go 2 links to find the vows, form the agency who wrote them.

again you bought the red meat, there is no ban spoken too. humane protection does not equal banning....

 

[elvis]

confusion? oh hell no, red meat ? oh hell yeah. think progress is an advocacy site pure and simple, there are same- right left center......he took their headlines snippets and went with it, reading it the actual pledge becomes a simple lesson in comprehension, even when you hit the links, you get sent to think progress LBGT which mischaracterizes the vow, and the simple Iowa caucus's site that says she signed it.

so when you read books, you always read the footnotes?

its not in the footnotes and the answer is yes btw. did you read vow 9 ?



Humane protection of woman and the innocent fruit of conjugal intimacy-
our next generation of American children- from human trafficking, sexual slavery, seduction into promiscuity, and all forms of pornography and prostitution, infanticide, abortion and other types of coercion or stolen innocence.



I pledge humane protection of the hummingbirds in my yard....

ok..
I see what it means now.. but it just shows the power of suggestion.

 

[uscitizen]

protection FROM....not banning it

Right now, there is no LEGAL protection from our children being exposed to pornography.
Yes, it is illegal to seel it to a minor....but it is not illegal for one to post it on the internet for a minor to easily see.

Personally, I disagree with her...let that be the job of the parents....but I will not sit by and allow you folks to intentionally misinterpret what she swore to.

Such spin is one of the reasons there is such a divide in America.

Jeez...stop the freaking game playing. It gets us nowhere as our politicians live the lives and and then the retirements of Riley.

how does a presidential candidate, in any elected or appointed capacity by which he or she may have the honor of serving her or his fellow citizens in these United States, accomplish said protection?

huh?

The same way any candidate accomplishes half the promises they make.
Didnt Obama promise to close GITMO?

Promsising or swearing to do all they can does not mean they will accomplish it.

Yeah like Bush promising to be against nation building and wasteful spending, etc.

Whatsa diff? We are in a 3rd Bush term.

 

[elvis]

so when you read books, you always read the footnotes?

its not in the footnotes and the answer is yes btw. did you read vow 9 ?



Humane protection of woman and the innocent fruit of conjugal intimacy-
our next generation of American children- from human trafficking, sexual slavery, seduction into promiscuity, and all forms of pornography and prostitution, infanticide, abortion and other types of coercion or stolen innocence.



I pledge humane protection of the hummingbirds in my yard....

ok..
I see what it means now.. but it just shows the power of suggestion.

and I didn't check the source he used either.

 

[Trajan]

how does a presidential candidate, in any elected or appointed capacity by which he or she may have the honor of serving her or his fellow citizens in these United States, accomplish said protection?

huh?

The same way any candidate accomplishes half the promises they make.
Didnt Obama promise to close GITMO?

Promsising or swearing to do all they can does not mean they will accomplish it.

that is not even an attempt.

of course they will have to go the legislative route.

unless you think the candidates will act as bodyguards who personally protect the vulnerable women and children.

where in does the vow say she will ban it and the example fits every situation- legislation, she cannot do sqaut on her own. who can?

if I thought that I would have said that, but since it makes no sense, I didn't.....

 

[Trajan]

its not in the footnotes and the answer is yes btw. did you read vow 9 ?



Humane protection of woman and the innocent fruit of conjugal intimacy-
our next generation of American children- from human trafficking, sexual slavery, seduction into promiscuity, and all forms of pornography and prostitution, infanticide, abortion and other types of coercion or stolen innocence.



I pledge humane protection of the hummingbirds in my yard....

ok..
I see what it means now.. but it just shows the power of suggestion.

and I didn't check the source he used either.

oh absolutely. and its red meat, they all run to the left or right in the primary and run up to it then tack back to the center, this is nothing more than what someone already said, its a sop to the religious right....*shrugs*

 

[Modbert]

that is what you posted IN your OP, you then have to go 2 links to find the vows, form the agency who wrote them.

again you bought the red meat, there is no ban spoken too. humane protection does not equal banning....

Or you could just go to the post directly below where I posted it to Elvis. But hey, whatever floats your boat.

Again, I'm not going to beat this to death and simply say that at this point if you're only focusing on my OP then you're deliberately ignoring the rest of my posts in this thread.

Furthermore, as to humane protection not equal banning, take note that it's a candidate pledge. It explicitly says above acting in any elected or appointed capacity.

 

[manifold]

The best part is Bachmann never stood any chance to begin with and this certainly does nothing to change that fact.

But whatcha gonna do?

 

[Trajan]

does humane protection equal banning?

 

[peace2011]

Animals have fur. Animals are never naked. Clothes are human beings artificial fur because human beings do not have fur.

Skin looks dirty so human skin and flesh should not be visible. Have you ever seen a sheep whose fur has been cut off? The "skin sheep" looks dirty.

Animals are better than useless people.

My understanding says that big breasts or boobs is some form of genetic mutation or diseases but foolish kids fall for it.

Porn stars and prostitutes have terrible diseases in their body and brains. People who are addicted to porn are also diseased.

 

[Si modo]

that is what you posted IN your OP, you then have to go 2 links to find the vows, form the agency who wrote them.

again you bought the red meat, there is no ban spoken too. humane protection does not equal banning....

Or you could just go to the post directly below where I posted it to Elvis. But hey, whatever floats your boat.

Again, I'm not going to beat this to death and simply say that at this point if you're only focusing on my OP then you're deliberately ignoring the rest of my posts in this thread.

Furthermore, as to humane protection not equal banning, take note that it's a candidate pledge. It explicitly says above acting in any elected or appointed capacity.

This thread is just another price check on your parroting.

 

[Modbert]

does humane protection equal banning?

Do the words acting in any elected or appointed capacity mean anything to you? Or do you think they don't have any intention of wanting to see abortion banned?

 

[Modbert]

This thread is just another price check on your parroting.

Sorry, you can't read. It was a personal pledge.

I mean, if you think that applies to one's personal opinions expressed in a personal, then that's good to know. Apparently, some folks have the idea of the First is that everyone must think as they do.

It doesn't work that way, no matter how bitter the dyke is.

btw, personal pledge?

The Candidate Vow:
Therefore, in any elected or appointed capacity by which I may have the honor of serving our fellow citizens in these United States, I the undersigned do hereby solemnly vow* to honor and to cherish, to defend and to uphold, the Institution of Marriage as only between one man and one woman. I vow* to do so through my:

• bullet points of pandashit follow