Ayn Rand is right. There is no higher state than

If you feed and educate and provide healthcare to the children of lazy worthless bums who are the dregs of society,

aren't you perpetuating their genetic inferiority? Shouldn't those children be left to die so we can weed out any genetic component that may have led to their parents uselessness,

and thus might be carried in the offspring?

I am for feeding, educating and providing healthcare to children whose parents are unable to provide for them. I would not adovcate letting any child die let alone for the purpose of genetic engineering.

Do you have anything to offer on:

existing programs are managed in manner which efficiently and immediately deals with the gaming of the system by any party in any fashion

You are a classsical liberal by that explanation, and you merely want government reform. That is fully understandable in this day and age of a political class in both parties lording it up in DC.

Nope. I am a classic American.
 
I am for feeding, educating and providing healthcare to children whose parents are unable to provide for them. I would not adovcate letting any child die let alone for the purpose of genetic engineering.

Do you have anything to offer on:

You are a classsical liberal by that explanation, and you merely want government reform. That is fully understandable in this day and age of a political class in both parties lording it up in DC.

Nope. I am a classic American.

I hope so!
 
a self serving state. Serving other people and a higher cause is bullshit.

Oh I don't know about that. As a vet and friend to a lot of former military personnel, I think we might disagree with you.

Also, if asked who I think history will remember as a greater contributor to mankind, I would pick Mother Teresa over Bernie Madoff or Donald Trump.
I would pick Marcus Aurelius over Caligula.
I would pick (Founding Father) Thomas Nelson over the colonists who chose not to risk any of their personal wealth for the formation of a new state.
I would pick Jesus over Xerses.

I think it's sad that the Right Wing Media has initiated such an attack on anything that doesn't serve the interest of it's corporate masters, that anyone (let alone many people) have bought into the belief that "Serving other people and a higher cause is bullshit." But people are easily led so I guess it's not surprising.
 
Are you THAT fucking obtuse? Hitler was no liberal. He wanted to 'burn out the poison of immorality which has entered into our whole life and culture as a result of liberal excess'

Holy fuck are you an idiot!!!

In Europe a "liberal" is someone who believes in free enterprise, not someone who believes in socialism, dipstick.

Hitler was making an excuse for burning books. Censuring the media is something all liberals believe in.

Did Hitler believe in free enterprise???
 
In Europe a "liberal" is someone who believes in free enterprise, not someone who believes in socialism, dipstick.

Hitler was making an excuse for burning books. Censuring the media is something all liberals believe in.

Did Hitler believe in free enterprise???

No, he was a socialist.
 

Forum List

Back
Top