“Avoid Violence” – Liberals’ New Phony Excuse

[Slade3200]

Completely off subject

Your side brought up the climate argument here, and I responded.

If you don't want your head handed to you on that issue again, don't bring it up again. Your fake news can censor my questions and my truth, but they do that simply because they cannot refute my truth.... and that could be a big problem for the LEFT if Jeff Sessions turns out to be a patriotic American and not a Zionist Traitor...

I didn't see it brought up, but I can tell you were itching to get your land mass theory out, which has some truth. Now answer my question. Does the Atmosphere make any difference in the temperature, ice build up and climate of our planet?

 

[LaDexter]

I think it is over anyway

TRANSLATION


When the ref counts 8, call the fight and move on...

 

[Slade3200]

Marching around with torches saying "Jews will not replace us" and "Blood and Soil" has nothing to do with a statue removal

Noise at a gathering under the First Amendment - no requirement you must agree with it....

What are you talking about? You just claimed they were there to protest the removal of a statue and called me retarded for not knowing that. I just showed you that what they were chanting had nothing to do with the removal of a statue and this is how you respond?
Im getting tired of dealing with you amateurs

and I told you they weren't the ones with the permit for the statue protest.

Thats fine and dandy, but not what our discussion was about. I think it is over anyway. Dex is on to climate change and Michael Dukakis

well sure it's what the discussion was about. you claimed the guys with the torches scheduled the event. They didn't. I expect better from the left.

Thats fine, I haven't looked up who got the permit. Don't really care to be honest, but thanks for straightening that out.

 

[Slade3200]

I think it is over anyway

TRANSLATION


When the ref counts 8, call the fight and move on...

The fight was over a long time ago buddy. You're trying to scrap from the ambulance. Just lay down and enjoy the morphine.

 

[LaDexter]

Does the Atmosphere make any difference in the temperature, ice build up and climate of our planet?

You were just given the truth of the past million years, that Greenland froze WHILE North America thawed.

Which did the atmosphere do, the freezing, the thawing, or both???

A neither, since it was constant for both.

Greenland moved 20+ miles NW. As it moved, and it had been moving that way for more than 100 million years, its winters got longer and colder, its summers got shorter, and finally it reached a point where the annual snowfall ceased to fully melt during summer, and it started to STACK, and THAT is the start of an ICE AGE, which is CONTINENT SPECIFIC and not planetary.

Antarctica has 70 million year old dinosaur fossils on it. That is because it was not on the South Pole 70 million years ago - it moved there.

 

[Slade3200]

Does the Atmosphere make any difference in the temperature, ice build up and climate of our planet?

You were just given the truth of the past million years, that Greenland froze WHILE North America thawed.

Which did the atmosphere do, the freezing, the thawing, or both???

A neither, since it was constant for both.

Greenland moved 20+ miles NW. As it moved, and it had been moving that way for more than 100 million years, its winters got longer and colder, its summers got shorter, and finally it reached a point where the annual snowfall ceased to fully melt during summer, and it started to STACK, and THAT is the start of an ICE AGE, which is CONTINENT SPECIFIC and not planetary.

Antarctica has 70 million year old dinosaur fossils on it. That is because it was not on the South Pole 70 million years ago - it moved there.

So was that a yes or no?

 

[Wry Catcher]

Holy Moldy, my alert file is filled with idiot-grams.

 

[bripat9643]

It's only a half truth.

The fact is, both sides demonize the other. How many Democrats Acting Badly topics have you pseudocons started in a pathetic attempt to generalize all democrats as evildoers out to destroy America?

Not meaning to be overly impetuous but the TOPIC is the excuse of violence to SILENCE conservative speech. That combined with Democrat mayors PERMITTING VIOLENCE - thereby opening the door for the excuse.

If it helps, you're not the only one straying a bit from the topic.

Well, a great part of the deliberately created divide in this county is this tendency to point out the mote in the other guy's eye while ignoring the beam in your own.

It's like listening to a hooker complain about all the promiscuity that occurs at office Christmas parties.

again, it's one think if someone wants to shout someone down, but to physically try to remove them from a public place is violence. And any evidence that the KKK or the white supremacists have been doing that feel free to post a link. Charlottesville was started by antifa. cops said so. Also, it seemed deliberate based on the fact that the original permit safety was not set up as agreed to by the mayor. wow. when something is so obvious like what antifa's been doing for a year and BLM for three, it's amazing how you all can see russia russia when there is not one piece of evidence. amazing thing these libturd kings.

The snowflakes will never admit that ANTIFA is guilty as charged. Propaganda doesn't work if people know it's propaganda.

 

[Slade3200]

It's only a half truth.

The fact is, both sides demonize the other. How many Democrats Acting Badly topics have you pseudocons started in a pathetic attempt to generalize all democrats as evildoers out to destroy America?

Not meaning to be overly impetuous but the TOPIC is the excuse of violence to SILENCE conservative speech. That combined with Democrat mayors PERMITTING VIOLENCE - thereby opening the door for the excuse.

If it helps, you're not the only one straying a bit from the topic.

Well, a great part of the deliberately created divide in this county is this tendency to point out the mote in the other guy's eye while ignoring the beam in your own.

It's like listening to a hooker complain about all the promiscuity that occurs at office Christmas parties.

again, it's one think if someone wants to shout someone down, but to physically try to remove them from a public place is violence. And any evidence that the KKK or the white supremacists have been doing that feel free to post a link. Charlottesville was started by antifa. cops said so. Also, it seemed deliberate based on the fact that the original permit safety was not set up as agreed to by the mayor. wow. when something is so obvious like what antifa's been doing for a year and BLM for three, it's amazing how you all can see russia russia when there is not one piece of evidence. amazing thing these libturd kings.

The snowflakes will never admit that ANTIFA is guilty as charged. Propaganda doesn't work if people know it's propaganda.

I guessed you missed Pelosi's condemnation of Antifa from yesterday. Or maybe she isn't a snowflake?

 

[bripat9643]

Marching around with torches saying "Jews will not replace us" and "Blood and Soil" has nothing to do with a statue removal

Noise at a gathering under the First Amendment - no requirement you must agree with it....

Snowflakes believe anything that pisses them off is illegal.

Wrong again, I've said exactly the opposite of that... Get a clue

You have. The rest of the snowflakes in here believe "hate speech" is a crime.

It's a crime if it is threatening, disruptive or inciting violence. Otherwise speech is speech and is protected under the 1st

"Disruptive" is a meaningless term. Threatening people with violence is already a crime. So is inciting violence. That has to be of the nature of "let's burn this shit down!" not just saying stuff that other people don't like.

 

[bripat9643]

It's only a half truth.

The fact is, both sides demonize the other. How many Democrats Acting Badly topics have you pseudocons started in a pathetic attempt to generalize all democrats as evildoers out to destroy America?

Not meaning to be overly impetuous but the TOPIC is the excuse of violence to SILENCE conservative speech. That combined with Democrat mayors PERMITTING VIOLENCE - thereby opening the door for the excuse.

If it helps, you're not the only one straying a bit from the topic.

Well, a great part of the deliberately created divide in this county is this tendency to point out the mote in the other guy's eye while ignoring the beam in your own.

It's like listening to a hooker complain about all the promiscuity that occurs at office Christmas parties.

again, it's one think if someone wants to shout someone down, but to physically try to remove them from a public place is violence. And any evidence that the KKK or the white supremacists have been doing that feel free to post a link. Charlottesville was started by antifa. cops said so. Also, it seemed deliberate based on the fact that the original permit safety was not set up as agreed to by the mayor. wow. when something is so obvious like what antifa's been doing for a year and BLM for three, it's amazing how you all can see russia russia when there is not one piece of evidence. amazing thing these libturd kings.

The snowflakes will never admit that ANTIFA is guilty as charged. Propaganda doesn't work if people know it's propaganda.

I guessed you missed Pelosi's condemnation of Antifa from yesterday. Or maybe she isn't a snowflake?

Yes she is. Apparently she's not as dumb as all the other snowflakes. Defending ANTIFA is guaranteed to lose elections for Democrats.

 

[Slade3200]

Noise at a gathering under the First Amendment - no requirement you must agree with it....

Snowflakes believe anything that pisses them off is illegal.

Wrong again, I've said exactly the opposite of that... Get a clue

You have. The rest of the snowflakes in here believe "hate speech" is a crime.

It's a crime if it is threatening, disruptive or inciting violence. Otherwise speech is speech and is protected under the 1st

"Disruptive" is a meaningless term. Threatening people with violence is already a crime. So is inciting violence. That has to be of the nature of "let's burn this shit down!" not just saying stuff that other people don't like.

Can you march down the hallway of an elementary school yelling "**** the Jews"? If not then what law are you breaking?

 

[bripat9643]

Snowflakes believe anything that pisses them off is illegal.

Wrong again, I've said exactly the opposite of that... Get a clue

You have. The rest of the snowflakes in here believe "hate speech" is a crime.

It's a crime if it is threatening, disruptive or inciting violence. Otherwise speech is speech and is protected under the 1st

"Disruptive" is a meaningless term. Threatening people with violence is already a crime. So is inciting violence. That has to be of the nature of "let's burn this shit down!" not just saying stuff that other people don't like.

Can you march down the hallway of an elementary school yelling "**** the Jews"? If not then what law are you breaking?

You can't do that in someone else's house, either. Is that a violation of your freedom of speech? Are the owners breaking a law if they kick you out. School officials have the responsibility of setting the rules in school buildings.

 

[Slade3200]

Wrong again, I've said exactly the opposite of that... Get a clue

You have. The rest of the snowflakes in here believe "hate speech" is a crime.

It's a crime if it is threatening, disruptive or inciting violence. Otherwise speech is speech and is protected under the 1st

"Disruptive" is a meaningless term. Threatening people with violence is already a crime. So is inciting violence. That has to be of the nature of "let's burn this shit down!" not just saying stuff that other people don't like.

Can you march down the hallway of an elementary school yelling "**** the Jews"? If not then what law are you breaking?

You can't do that in someone else's house, either. Is that a violation of your freedom of speech? Are the owners breaking a law if they kick you out. School officials have the responsibility of setting the rules in school buildings.

Exactly, and if you are disruptive with your speech they can kick you out. Just as your neighbors can call the police on you for screaming obscenities, even at your own house if you are disturbing the neighborhood

 

[bripat9643]

You have. The rest of the snowflakes in here believe "hate speech" is a crime.

It's a crime if it is threatening, disruptive or inciting violence. Otherwise speech is speech and is protected under the 1st

"Disruptive" is a meaningless term. Threatening people with violence is already a crime. So is inciting violence. That has to be of the nature of "let's burn this shit down!" not just saying stuff that other people don't like.

Can you march down the hallway of an elementary school yelling "**** the Jews"? If not then what law are you breaking?

You can't do that in someone else's house, either. Is that a violation of your freedom of speech? Are the owners breaking a law if they kick you out. School officials have the responsibility of setting the rules in school buildings.

Exactly, and if you are disruptive with your speech they can kick you out. Just as your neighbors can call the police on you for screaming obscenities, even at your own house if you are disturbing the neighborhood

Which has what to do with neo-nazis staging a legal protest?

 

[Slade3200]

It's a crime if it is threatening, disruptive or inciting violence. Otherwise speech is speech and is protected under the 1st

"Disruptive" is a meaningless term. Threatening people with violence is already a crime. So is inciting violence. That has to be of the nature of "let's burn this shit down!" not just saying stuff that other people don't like.

Can you march down the hallway of an elementary school yelling "**** the Jews"? If not then what law are you breaking?

You can't do that in someone else's house, either. Is that a violation of your freedom of speech? Are the owners breaking a law if they kick you out. School officials have the responsibility of setting the rules in school buildings.

Exactly, and if you are disruptive with your speech they can kick you out. Just as your neighbors can call the police on you for screaming obscenities, even at your own house if you are disturbing the neighborhood

Which has what to do with neo-nazis staging a legal protest?

I've already defended their right to free speech in that situation. I was talking about situations when speech can be considered an offense if taken too far

 

[Wry Catcher]

It's only a half truth.

The fact is, both sides demonize the other. How many Democrats Acting Badly topics have you pseudocons started in a pathetic attempt to generalize all democrats as evildoers out to destroy America?

Not meaning to be overly impetuous but the TOPIC is the excuse of violence to SILENCE conservative speech. That combined with Democrat mayors PERMITTING VIOLENCE - thereby opening the door for the excuse.

If it helps, you're not the only one straying a bit from the topic.

Well, a great part of the deliberately created divide in this county is this tendency to point out the mote in the other guy's eye while ignoring the beam in your own.

It's like listening to a hooker complain about all the promiscuity that occurs at office Christmas parties.

again, it's one think if someone wants to shout someone down, but to physically try to remove them from a public place is violence. And any evidence that the KKK or the white supremacists have been doing that feel free to post a link. Charlottesville was started by antifa. cops said so. Also, it seemed deliberate based on the fact that the original permit safety was not set up as agreed to by the mayor. wow. when something is so obvious like what antifa's been doing for a year and BLM for three, it's amazing how you all can see russia russia when there is not one piece of evidence. amazing thing these libturd kings.

The snowflakes will never admit that ANTIFA is guilty as charged. Propaganda doesn't work if people know it's propaganda.

Propaganda ^^^ in the form of an idiot-gram.

 

[Wry Catcher]

It's a crime if it is threatening, disruptive or inciting violence. Otherwise speech is speech and is protected under the 1st

"Disruptive" is a meaningless term. Threatening people with violence is already a crime. So is inciting violence. That has to be of the nature of "let's burn this shit down!" not just saying stuff that other people don't like.

Can you march down the hallway of an elementary school yelling "**** the Jews"? If not then what law are you breaking?

You can't do that in someone else's house, either. Is that a violation of your freedom of speech? Are the owners breaking a law if they kick you out. School officials have the responsibility of setting the rules in school buildings.

Exactly, and if you are disruptive with your speech they can kick you out. Just as your neighbors can call the police on you for screaming obscenities, even at your own house if you are disturbing the neighborhood

Which has what to do with neo-nazis staging a legal protest?

On its face, the neo-nazi seek to arouse incendiary emotions, and comes very near to the crime of inciting a riot but not far enough according to Hess v. Indiana, 414 U.S. 105 (1973) and Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U. S. 395; however, by carrying firearms and other weapons and shields the court might find such behavior so incendiary as to promote violence and rule differently in the future.

 

[bripat9643]

"Disruptive" is a meaningless term. Threatening people with violence is already a crime. So is inciting violence. That has to be of the nature of "let's burn this shit down!" not just saying stuff that other people don't like.

Can you march down the hallway of an elementary school yelling "**** the Jews"? If not then what law are you breaking?

You can't do that in someone else's house, either. Is that a violation of your freedom of speech? Are the owners breaking a law if they kick you out. School officials have the responsibility of setting the rules in school buildings.

Exactly, and if you are disruptive with your speech they can kick you out. Just as your neighbors can call the police on you for screaming obscenities, even at your own house if you are disturbing the neighborhood

Which has what to do with neo-nazis staging a legal protest?

On its face, the neo-nazi seek to arouse incendiary emotions, and comes very near to the crime of inciting a riot but not far enough according to Hess v. Indiana, 414 U.S. 105 (1973) and Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U. S. 395; however, by carrying firearms and other weapons and shields the court might find such behavior so incendiary as to promote violence and rule differently in the future.

Sorry, cockroach, but pissing off snowflakes is not a crime.

 

[LaDexter]

Can you march down the hallway of an elementary school yelling "**** the Jews"?

If you march down a school hall and yell **** WHITE PEOPLE you get cheered and rewarded by the leftist bigots in charge of the school.