AUnited States President doesn't have absolute power.

[Supposn]

A United States President doesn't have absolute power.


Amongthe leading scholars and practitioners within all fields of human endeavors, many profess concepts of the mightiest' safety being somewhat dependent upon whatever shields are provided for those otherwise unable to protect themselves.

Huge enterprises “too big to be permitted to fail”, are less secure if small shopkeepers cannot enforce their agreements with their merchandise suppliers or their customers. It's been said, "those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither Liberty nor safety”, and "there never was a horse that couldn't be rode, or a cowboy that couldn't be throwed".

That's why the U.S. Supreme Court should, and I expect they will deem U.S. Presidents answerable for their acts while in office. A United States President doesn't have absolute power. Respectfully, Suppos

 

[BackAgain]

A United States President doesn't have absolute power.


Amongthe leading scholars and practitioners within all fields of human endeavors, many profess concepts of the mightiest' safety being somewhat dependent upon whatever shields are provided for those otherwise unable to protect themselves.

Huge enterprises “too big to be permitted to fail”, are less secure if small shopkeepers cannot enforce their agreements with their merchandise suppliers or their customers. It's been said, "those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither Liberty nor safety”, and "there never was a horse that couldn't be rode, or a cowboy that couldn't be throwed".

That's why the U.S. Supreme Court should, and I expect they will deem U.S. Presidents answerable for their acts while in office. A United States President doesn't have absolute power. Respectfully, Suppos

No shit

 

[jotathought]

A United States President doesn't have absolute power.


Amongthe leading scholars and practitioners within all fields of human endeavors, many profess concepts of the mightiest' safety being somewhat dependent upon whatever shields are provided for those otherwise unable to protect themselves.

Huge enterprises “too big to be permitted to fail”, are less secure if small shopkeepers cannot enforce their agreements with their merchandise suppliers or their customers. It's been said, "those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither Liberty nor safety”, and "there never was a horse that couldn't be rode, or a cowboy that couldn't be throwed".

That's why the U.S. Supreme Court should, and I expect they will deem U.S. Presidents answerable for their acts while in office. A United States President doesn't have absolute power. Respectfully, Suppos

Uh .. that's why there are 3 branches of government ... stuff they used to teach in school.

 

[jack3]

No, but presidential power has grown over the decades.

 

[BackAgain]

No, but presidential power has grown over the decades.

So has libtard imbecility.

Your avie shows you to be a jerkoff, by the way.

 

[Supposn]

Uh .. that's why there are 3 branches of government ... stuff they used to teach in school.

Jotathought, before the election of Donald Trump, no one paid to have the courts explain that to their lawyers, and there's been no doubt ALL federal judges and most voters in all states understood that. Respectfully, Supposn