Zone1 Atheists have nothing to say against faith in God

Blasphemy.

I provided the evidence so all you need to do is build up enough courage to click on those links. :link:
The Gospel of Mark records Jesus performing actions and making statements that demonstrate divine authority, leading many to interpret these as claims to equality with God, such as forgiving sins (a power only God has), controlling nature, and accepting worship, culminating in his affirmation before the High Priest that he is the "Son of Man" coming on the clouds, which was understood as blasphemy and claiming divine status. While he doesn't use the explicit "I AM" phrases of John, Mark portrays Jesus' identity as God through his deeds and his authoritative claims.

Key Examples in Mark:
  • Forgiving Sins (Mark 2:5-10): Jesus tells a paralytic, "Son, your sins are forgiven," prompting religious leaders to ask, "Who can forgive sins but God alone?".
  • Authority Over Nature (Mark 4:35-41): Jesus calms a violent storm, leading his disciples to ask, "Who is this? Even the wind and the sea obey him!".
  • Power Over Demons (Mark 1:23-28): Jesus casts out an unclean spirit, showing unique power and authority.
  • "Son of Man" at Trial (Mark 14:61-64): When asked if he is the Messiah, Jesus responds by quoting Daniel 7:13-14, saying they will see the "Son of Man seated at the right hand of the Power and coming with the clouds of heaven," a direct claim to divine authority.
How Mark Presents Jesus' Divinity:
  • Miraculous Deeds: Healing the sick, casting out demons, and calming storms are presented as acts of divine power.
  • Authority & Obedience: Jesus demonstrates authority over the Law and demands obedience, actions reserved for God.
  • Messianic Identity: Mark emphasizes Jesus as God's Son and the promised Messiah, applying Old Testament prophecies (like Isaiah 40:3) to him.
In essence, Mark builds a case for Jesus' divinity through his actions and claims, even if he uses the title "Son of Man" more often, showcasing his unique status as God's Son with divine power.
 
GLASNOST

Ask for evidence again :rofl:
  1. The universe popping into existence in an unnatural way.
  2. The only possible configuration of matter - in an infinite number of possible configurations - that can produce a universe capable of producing intelligence.
  3. Living matter forming from inanimate matter.
  4. Intelligence being predestined to arise according to the laws of nature after life was formed from inanimate matter.
 
The Gospel of Mark records Jesus performing ...
... Hokus-Pokus. It's all been spelt out in the two videos I've provided. You see, I don't mind if you believe in that stuff. If it helps you to endure the difficulties of life then I see it as a good thing. But I don't need superstition to get me through life. I am strong enough and experienced enough and wise enough to live life to a very high degree without believing in fairy tales. :nono:
 
... Hokus-Pokus. It's all been spelt out in the two videos I've provided. You see, I don't mind if you believe in that stuff. If it helps you to endure the difficulties of life then I see it as a good thing. But I don't need superstition to get me through life. I am strong enough and experienced enough and wise enough to live life to a very high degree without believing in fairy tales. :nono:
Why haven't you commented on the evidence?
  1. The universe popping into existence in an unnatural way.
  2. The only possible configuration of matter - in an infinite number of possible configurations - that can produce a universe capable of producing intelligence.
  3. Living matter forming from inanimate matter.
  4. Intelligence being predestined to arise according to the laws of nature after life was formed from inanimate matter.
 
Why haven't you commented on the evidence?
Why haven’t you admitted that I have done numerous times? I think the reason is because I frighten the be-jesus out of you and your elders are unable to guide you out from the quagmire you’ve got yourself into despite you begging them incessantly, ”What should I say, what should I say?” :omg:
 
If some goofy atheist believes in astrology, that doesn't mean they should believe in magical gods instead.

It means they shouldn't believe in astrology.
 
This is my issue with both sides of almost any debate. What makes this video any more or less accurate than those that have evidence Christ existed?
"Evidence" is what the video is all about and if you don't know what "evidence" means then it would be useless to give you an answer. If your neighbour says he saw a cat eating an elefant in downtown NYC would you call that evidence because he said it?
 
"Evidence" is what the video is all about and if you don't know what "evidence" means then it would be useless to give you an answer. If your neighbour says he saw a cat eating an elefant in downtown NYC would you call that evidence because he said it?

Interesting response to a person that respected your views and took time to watch the video you recommended. Since you don’t respect me, I think we are done communicating as it is pointless. Have a great weekend.
 
Interesting response to a person that respected your views and took time to watch the video you recommended. Since you don’t respect me, I think we are done communicating as it is pointless. Have a great weekend.
If you take it so personally then there isn't much I can tell you. You'll have to ask yourself if you are now seeking understanding. Find what I wrote that you think is "disrespectful" and give it earnest evaluation. EVIDENCE is the key word and it is necessary to understand what it means. If you don't then you are right .... we are wasting our time.
 
I asked a question based on your reply.
There, you see. You asked him a question based on his reply. You didn't pluck it from thin air. You read what he said and you asked for clarification. Is there anything wrong in that? No. My response to you was the same. I asked if you understood what "evidence" means because your response looks like you don't. But you translated it as disrespect. Why?
 
15th post
Such a stupid answer. There are members of the church on both sides of the isle.
1771619020978.webp
 
Men who hate our church have no clue of all the good our church does good for the human beings.
Men who hate our church are victims of themselves, and not our victims.
Absolutely! When there are disasters, they will call on us and demand our help. We will give help without their demands.
 
Back
Top Bottom