ID'iot creationism makes no sense.
Makes more sense than evolution, where is that missing link at anyway? Oh yeah, they can't find it.
There are many hominids linking our early ape-like ancestors to the modern Homo sapiens sapiens.
hominids evolution scholarly article - Google Scholar
I did check it out, and I can find just as many articles disavowing evolution.
However, do you have the intestinal fortitude to admit, that evolution, is a theory, and not proven fact?
I have no problem admitting that my faith, is just that, faith, not based upon anything other than theory, and the belief that 12 men would not conspire together, to be put to death and persecuted for something they knew to be a lie. (while it is true that many people have died for a lie, those that do, usually believe that lie to be the truth.)
I'm sorry, I don't think you're lying, but you can not find any scholarly articles -meaning peer-reviewed with repeatable methodologies in scientific journals- of biologists, geologists, chemists, or anyone in a field-related science disavowing evolution. Not one. Please prove me wrong.
Evolution is an observed fact. Your DNA is slightly different from your parents: that's evolution. Extrapolate that by tens of thousands of generations and your off-spring's DNA may be sufficiently different from your parents as to render that offspring unrecognizable as the same species. Viral mutation is evolution. Adaptation is evolution. The Theory of Natural Selection attempts to explain, describe, and make predictions of the fact that evolution happens.
I don't believe in theories. They require no faith. They are not fact or truth but are human attempts to align our thinking more closely to objective reality and they will never entirely succeed because objective reality can not be translated into words or math and remain unfiltered and objective. So, no, the faith is all yours.
The Apostles died for what they believed to be true. They were martyrs. Many religions have martyrs. What makes yours so special?
That argument was destroyed years ago. I'm surprised you do not know about it. The evolutionists claimed that they could trace hominids seven millions years to early man. They presented evidence to a Dr. Lind claiming this proved their theory. The response was Mrs. Leakey's discovery which was reported in TIME Magazine on November 10,1975 page 93 made the chart obsolete. The response was not necessarily, they heard about the discovery but they simply believe it moves man back 3 millions years. An overlap in time. Dr. Lind explained that that would blow their theory of evolution to pieces. Because the 3 million year period wiped out 2/3 of their chart. How could man evolve from Australophithecus if man was already here one million years before them? (See Bones of Contention by Marvin Lubenov)
When confronted with this the man who was in charge of the project that was funding the education of evolution was dumbfounded. He knew he had been wrong and could not ague the science. He decided to ask further questions and wanted to know what Dr. Lind thought of the Peking man. He admitted that he had already heard about the missing bones. Dr. Lind explained yes, the Peking bones were well guarded in China by their finders. Two french scientists who were permitted to study them decided they were just animal bones.
Then the bones mysteriously disappeared during WWII!
So there you have it. The Peking Man was put in with the other questionable species like Piltdown Man who was built up from the jawbone of a modern ape and fossilized human skull.......and Hesperopithecus, which was a horrible blunder, This one "man" being built up from one tooth of an extinct pig! (See the Bone Peddlers: Selling Evolution by William R. Fix -New York, Macmillan Publishing Company 1984)
What about the Neanderthal man? Their brains were 13% larger than the average modern and not a single reputable scientist thinks its a missing link - see Buried Alive: The Startling Truth about Neaderthal Man by Dr. Jack Couzzo 1998.
And last but not least there is LUCY! What about LUCY? Doesn't she prove evolution? After all, she had long forearms, short legs, curved fingers and was 3 foot tall! Lucy's an
ape. Not a missing link.
Oh and Homo Erectus which was made up fro the scullcap of a gibbon ( large ape) and a human thigh bone? The Leiden Museum and the American Museum of Natural history have removed their displays! ha! ha!
see Bones of Contentions by marvin Lubenow pg. 86 and Creation Seminar #3 by Dr. Kent Hovind.
One final note. The dating methods used by these evolutionists are off. Using the same radiometric methods - Did you know that snails were carbon dated as being 27,000 years old and they were still alive? See Science (1984)Volume 224, pp. 58-61. Who knows how old the universe is? Only God. That's who. Who is God? Jesus Christ. That's who. He created it all - see John 1:1 - here is yet another example of the error of their scientific methods for dating -
Lava from Mt. St. Helens was dated by the Potassium Argon method and was estimated to be between 340,000 - to 3 million years old. It erupted in 1980.
You see? It's all guess work. Evolution is a lie. Even Darwin admitted it on his death bed. He admitted he was wrong. You should too, mountain man.
Creationism is based on scientific evidence and Biblical truth whereas the entire theory of evolution is a hoax now uncovered. Thank you for reading!
