What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Atheist Icon Richard Dawkins Being Disowned Because He Reveals Hypocrisy of Woke Fanatics

Eric Arthur Blair

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2015
Messages
23,939
Reaction score
14,174
Points
1,415
"Earlier this month, Dawkins compared the lives of trans people to Rachel Dolezal, the white woman who claimed to “identify” as Black while trying to forge a career in Black activism and academia.

He tweeted on 12 April: “In 2015, Rachel Dolezal, a white chapter president of NAACP, was vilified for identifying as Black.

“Some men choose to identify as women, and some women choose to identify as men.

“You will be vilified if you deny that they literally are what they identify as. Discuss.”

Atheist Richard Dawkins has earned the rage and hatred of woke pro Trans imbeciles and Humanists for logically pointing out that if men can deny their immutable biological characteristics and claim womanhood, because that's what they want to do, why can't former Spokane, Wa. NAACP president Rachel Dolezal claim blackness (instead of her actual white heritage) because she prefers being a "Black" person.
It's a simple logical question. Why does it infuriate some?

The American Humanist Association punished him, to the degree they could, by revoking his 1996 Humanist of the Year award in a classic woke move designed to punish a now discredited apostate.
But once the award has been given, a twenty-five year old award, taking it back now is rather lame
and pointless, isn't it?

The leftist hypocrites can despise Dawkins now but can they dispute his simple point? It seems they can't.
All they can do is cast into leftist Hell now next to Donald Trump or Caitlin Jenner or whoever else they despise.

The question still is: If a man can identify as a woman why can't a white woman identify as a Black person?
It exposes the silliness and absurdity of the trans movement (though in rare cases someone may actually believe they are in the wrong body which would appear to be a mental disorder).
There is no way to deny one disorder (male/female) and not grant the other (black/white) and that
pisses the woke transgender people off. Like really pisses them off. And Richard Dawkins will be hounded to
his grave for his simple truth. If one is okay, why not the other?
 
Last edited:

Prof.Lunaphiles

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2020
Messages
2,611
Reaction score
1,741
Points
938
Location
Transient
Okay. So, what is it that you want to discuss?

urinal-your-opinion-would-fit-and-look-nice-here-png.490346
 

toobfreak

Tungsten/Glass Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2017
Messages
43,744
Reaction score
29,977
Points
2,615
Location
On The Way Home To Earth
You will be vilified if you deny that they literally are what they identify as. Discuss.

Nature produces MEN and WOMEN. Gender is not a subject for debate, it is MECHANICAL: you either have an Innie or an Outie.

The rest of this crap about what people "identify" with is a bunch of bull: you can "identify" as a black, a woman, a space alien---- now you are in the realm of semantics and psychology.

When a society decides as we seem to be doing that "facts" are simply what you want them to be instead of what they really are, you can kiss your ass goodbye.
 

Prof.Lunaphiles

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2020
Messages
2,611
Reaction score
1,741
Points
938
Location
Transient
I don't think Dawkins is all that offended by the recall of the humanist award. I think the elite atheists have no strong allegiances to the atheist organizations, because they want the elites to foster the membership for free, and the organizations suck.
 

idb

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
14,768
Reaction score
2,443
Points
265
It's refreshing to see someone break from the comfort of his "tribe" and voice an honest opinion.
 

themirrorthief

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2021
Messages
2,364
Reaction score
1,896
Points
1,908
"Earlier this month, Dawkins compared the lives of trans people to Rachel Dolezal, the white woman who claimed to “identify” as Black while trying to forge a career in Black activism and academia.

He tweeted on 12 April: “In 2015, Rachel Dolezal, a white chapter president of NAACP, was vilified for identifying as Black.

“Some men choose to identify as women, and some women choose to identify as men.

“You will be vilified if you deny that they literally are what they identify as. Discuss.”

Atheist Richard Dawkins has earned the rage and hatred of woke pro Trans imbeciles and Humanists for logically pointing out that if men can deny their immutable biological characteristics and claim womanhood, because that's what they want to do, why can't former Spokane, Wa. NAACP president Rachel Dolezal claim blackness (instead of her actual white heritage) because she prefers being a "Black" person.
It's a simple logical question. Why does it infuriate some?

The American Humanist Association punished him, to the degree they could, by revoking his 1996 Humanist of the Year award in a classic woke move designed to punish a now discredited apostate.
But once the award has been given, a twenty-five year old award, taking it back now is rather lame
and pointless, isn't it?

The leftist hypocrites can despise Dawkins now but can they dispute his simple point? It seems they can't.
All they can do is cast into leftist Hell now next to Donald Trump or Caitlin Jenner or whoever else they despise.

The question still is: If a man can identify as a woman why can't a white woman identify as a Black person?
It exposes the silliness and absurdity of the trans movement (though in rare cases someone may actually believe they are in the wrong body which would appear to be a mental disorder).
There is no way to deny one disorder (male/female) and not grant the other (black/white) and that
pisses the woke transgender people off. Like really pisses them off. And Richard Dawkins will be hounded to
his grave for his simple truth. If one is okay, why not the other?
I identify as a jet...been flying high home skillet
 

Quasar44

Platinum Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Messages
18,792
Reaction score
9,716
Points
1,138
Location
Las Vegas
Dawkins is a brilliant biologist
 

LeftofLeft

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
15,825
Reaction score
7,329
Points
390
I identify as a brown man yet many on this board who defend the right of a man to identify as a woman so he can go into the same bathroom as young girls - insist I am a white racist.

Be consistent with your self identifier argument by not compromising it with a sense of entitlement to label all others.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$95.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top