What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Atheism's big LIE

ding

Confront reality
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
85,767
Reaction score
9,231
Points
2,070
Location
Houston
So given that your bias leads you to believe that man made climate change is one of the two most robust theories in history, can you show me the experiment that they did to confirm that theory? Because for you to go that far out on a limb with absolutely zero scientific evidence on such a complex subject as the earth's climate definitely points to you having a bias.
That's a fact. And if you don't agree, you're wrong. Sorry troll... I don't debate denier goobers on the truth of that theory. And especially not the mountains of evidence we have collected.
So that's a no? You can't produce any data for a scientific experiment which confirms your beliefs? Cause it feels like you got triggered just by my asking you for evidence cause you are hurling insults at me. Which is an sign of a bias.

What's a fact? That there is no scientific experimental evidence that supports man made global warming?

Actually the link I provided to you was to a paper detailing a scientific experiment that disproved the theory of man made global warming due to CO2. So there's that data, right?
 

ding

Confront reality
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
85,767
Reaction score
9,231
Points
2,070
Location
Houston
And especially not the mountains of evidence we have collected.
All the data you think proves man made climate change really just proves that the planet warms during interglacial cycles. We are still 2C below peak temperatures of previous interglacial cycles and the sea level is 26 ft below the peak elevation of the last interglacial cycle.

So really you don't have anything and you certainly do not have a scientific experiment which support your perception of fact. It's not a fact. It's not even correct.
 

ding

Confront reality
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
85,767
Reaction score
9,231
Points
2,070
Location
Houston
Pretty sure this exchange just proved grumblenut's point about bias affecting science.

The reality is that science is never settled. The risk comes from people who are so closed minded that they dismiss everything that challenges their beliefs. There is nothing more unscientific than to tout theories as fact. It leads to confirmation bias and should be avoided at all costs.
 

BreezeWood

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
11,110
Reaction score
665
Points
85
"Everything is evidence for gods!"

So painfully fallacious and stupid.
Considering you dismiss everything there's no real difference.
Well, except for a burden of proof. A compelling argument to believe something. But yeah, other than the most important difference there is: no difference.. Good one.
You mean other than Jesus Christ, Patrick?

Yeah, that was provided too. The first cause can be no thing.

Now where's your evidence that God doesn't exist, Patrick?
.
The first cause can be no thing.
.
is that suppose to make sense - * repeating it really isn't helping your cause ... whatever that might be.

physiology is a physical, metaphysical substance and proof the metaphysical "can be" - physical. and is a "thing" {sic}.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
no, retard, that's not true. spirituality is comprehensible without being a thing by a thing that's how it works ... try and put the marbles back in the bag - hopefully that will help. you.
 

ding

Confront reality
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
85,767
Reaction score
9,231
Points
2,070
Location
Houston
"Everything is evidence for gods!"

So painfully fallacious and stupid.
Considering you dismiss everything there's no real difference.
Well, except for a burden of proof. A compelling argument to believe something. But yeah, other than the most important difference there is: no difference.. Good one.
You mean other than Jesus Christ, Patrick?

Yeah, that was provided too. The first cause can be no thing.

Now where's your evidence that God doesn't exist, Patrick?
.
The first cause can be no thing.
.
is that suppose to make sense - * repeating it really isn't helping your cause ... whatever that might be.

physiology is a physical, metaphysical substance and proof the metaphysical "can be" - physical. and is a "thing" {sic}.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
no, retard, that's not true. spirituality is comprehensible without being a thing by a thing that's how it works ... try and put the marbles back in the bag - hopefully that will help. you.
A two dimensional being would have an easier time trying to understand your third dimension than you - a three dimensional being - would in trying to understand a non-dimensional being outside of space time.

So you can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
 

BreezeWood

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
11,110
Reaction score
665
Points
85
"Everything is evidence for gods!"

So painfully fallacious and stupid.
Considering you dismiss everything there's no real difference.
Well, except for a burden of proof. A compelling argument to believe something. But yeah, other than the most important difference there is: no difference.. Good one.
You mean other than Jesus Christ, Patrick?

Yeah, that was provided too. The first cause can be no thing.

Now where's your evidence that God doesn't exist, Patrick?
.
The first cause can be no thing.
.
is that suppose to make sense - * repeating it really isn't helping your cause ... whatever that might be.

physiology is a physical, metaphysical substance and proof the metaphysical "can be" - physical. and is a "thing" {sic}.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
no, retard, that's not true. spirituality is comprehensible without being a thing by a thing that's how it works ... try and put the marbles back in the bag - hopefully that will help. you.
A two dimensional being would have an easier time trying to understand your third dimension than you - a three dimensional being - would in trying to understand a non-dimensional being outside of space time.

So you can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
"Everything is evidence for gods!"

So painfully fallacious and stupid.
Considering you dismiss everything there's no real difference.
Well, except for a burden of proof. A compelling argument to believe something. But yeah, other than the most important difference there is: no difference.. Good one.
You mean other than Jesus Christ, Patrick?

Yeah, that was provided too. The first cause can be no thing.

Now where's your evidence that God doesn't exist, Patrick?
.
The first cause can be no thing.
.
is that suppose to make sense - * repeating it really isn't helping your cause ... whatever that might be.

physiology is a physical, metaphysical substance and proof the metaphysical "can be" - physical. and is a "thing" {sic}.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
no, retard, that's not true. spirituality is comprehensible without being a thing by a thing that's how it works ... try and put the marbles back in the bag - hopefully that will help. you.
A two dimensional being would have an easier time trying to understand your third dimension than you - a three dimensional being - would in trying to understand a non-dimensional being outside of space time.

So you can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
So you can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.

no, retard, that's not true. spirituality is comprehensible without being a thing by a thing that's how it works ... try and put the marbles back in the bag - hopefully that will help. you.

A two dimensional being would have an easier time trying to understand your third dimension than you - a three dimensional being - would in trying to understand a non-dimensional being outside of space time.
.
A two dimensional being ...
.
:iyfyus.jpg:
.
where have you proven matter or energy have not existed.
 

Grumblenuts

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2017
Messages
6,811
Reaction score
1,635
Points
140
If you think the natural laws are skewed by bias (and thus not correct),
Again, try cleaning your glasses. Else cut the straw man attack crap.
But he said "natural laws".
Who? Now look what you've dragged in. Best climb down off that high horse before you wreck yourself. Here's what I was talking about in case you're ever really interested..
 

ding

Confront reality
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
85,767
Reaction score
9,231
Points
2,070
Location
Houston
"Everything is evidence for gods!"

So painfully fallacious and stupid.
Considering you dismiss everything there's no real difference.
Well, except for a burden of proof. A compelling argument to believe something. But yeah, other than the most important difference there is: no difference.. Good one.
You mean other than Jesus Christ, Patrick?

Yeah, that was provided too. The first cause can be no thing.

Now where's your evidence that God doesn't exist, Patrick?
.
The first cause can be no thing.
.
is that suppose to make sense - * repeating it really isn't helping your cause ... whatever that might be.

physiology is a physical, metaphysical substance and proof the metaphysical "can be" - physical. and is a "thing" {sic}.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
no, retard, that's not true. spirituality is comprehensible without being a thing by a thing that's how it works ... try and put the marbles back in the bag - hopefully that will help. you.
A two dimensional being would have an easier time trying to understand your third dimension than you - a three dimensional being - would in trying to understand a non-dimensional being outside of space time.

So you can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
"Everything is evidence for gods!"

So painfully fallacious and stupid.
Considering you dismiss everything there's no real difference.
Well, except for a burden of proof. A compelling argument to believe something. But yeah, other than the most important difference there is: no difference.. Good one.
You mean other than Jesus Christ, Patrick?

Yeah, that was provided too. The first cause can be no thing.

Now where's your evidence that God doesn't exist, Patrick?
.
The first cause can be no thing.
.
is that suppose to make sense - * repeating it really isn't helping your cause ... whatever that might be.

physiology is a physical, metaphysical substance and proof the metaphysical "can be" - physical. and is a "thing" {sic}.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
no, retard, that's not true. spirituality is comprehensible without being a thing by a thing that's how it works ... try and put the marbles back in the bag - hopefully that will help. you.
A two dimensional being would have an easier time trying to understand your third dimension than you - a three dimensional being - would in trying to understand a non-dimensional being outside of space time.

So you can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
So you can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.

no, retard, that's not true. spirituality is comprehensible without being a thing by a thing that's how it works ... try and put the marbles back in the bag - hopefully that will help. you.

A two dimensional being would have an easier time trying to understand your third dimension than you - a three dimensional being - would in trying to understand a non-dimensional being outside of space time.
.
A two dimensional being ...
.
:iyfyus.jpg:
.
where have you proven matter or energy have not existed.

Matter and energy were created from nothing by God. That's a core monotheistic belief.
 

ding

Confront reality
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
85,767
Reaction score
9,231
Points
2,070
Location
Houston
If I were grumblenuts, I'd start with one of the lesser theories... like say evolution or man made climate change. :lol:

But he said "natural laws".

Now look what you've dragged in.
Dude, I'm on your side. Even if you are not consistent in always executing the belief that one should remain open minded about science because the possibility of human bias enters into everything manifested by mind, at least you acknowledge that science is never settled.

To set the record straight, I don't have a problem with your pet theory of aether. I welcome new ideas. But when you can't explain it in a simple way that can be understood by me, I'm rejecting the presentation not the need to have a different belief. That I endorse.
 

BreezeWood

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
11,110
Reaction score
665
Points
85
"Everything is evidence for gods!"

So painfully fallacious and stupid.
Considering you dismiss everything there's no real difference.
Well, except for a burden of proof. A compelling argument to believe something. But yeah, other than the most important difference there is: no difference.. Good one.
You mean other than Jesus Christ, Patrick?

Yeah, that was provided too. The first cause can be no thing.

Now where's your evidence that God doesn't exist, Patrick?
.
The first cause can be no thing.
.
is that suppose to make sense - * repeating it really isn't helping your cause ... whatever that might be.

physiology is a physical, metaphysical substance and proof the metaphysical "can be" - physical. and is a "thing" {sic}.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
no, retard, that's not true. spirituality is comprehensible without being a thing by a thing that's how it works ... try and put the marbles back in the bag - hopefully that will help. you.
A two dimensional being would have an easier time trying to understand your third dimension than you - a three dimensional being - would in trying to understand a non-dimensional being outside of space time.

So you can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
"Everything is evidence for gods!"

So painfully fallacious and stupid.
Considering you dismiss everything there's no real difference.
Well, except for a burden of proof. A compelling argument to believe something. But yeah, other than the most important difference there is: no difference.. Good one.
You mean other than Jesus Christ, Patrick?

Yeah, that was provided too. The first cause can be no thing.

Now where's your evidence that God doesn't exist, Patrick?
.
The first cause can be no thing.
.
is that suppose to make sense - * repeating it really isn't helping your cause ... whatever that might be.

physiology is a physical, metaphysical substance and proof the metaphysical "can be" - physical. and is a "thing" {sic}.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
no, retard, that's not true. spirituality is comprehensible without being a thing by a thing that's how it works ... try and put the marbles back in the bag - hopefully that will help. you.
A two dimensional being would have an easier time trying to understand your third dimension than you - a three dimensional being - would in trying to understand a non-dimensional being outside of space time.

So you can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
So you can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.

no, retard, that's not true. spirituality is comprehensible without being a thing by a thing that's how it works ... try and put the marbles back in the bag - hopefully that will help. you.

A two dimensional being would have an easier time trying to understand your third dimension than you - a three dimensional being - would in trying to understand a non-dimensional being outside of space time.
.
A two dimensional being ...
.
:iyfyus.jpg:
.
where have you proven matter or energy have not existed.

Matter and energy were created from nothing by God. That's a core monotheistic belief.
.
Matter and energy were created from nothing by God. That's a core monotheistic belief.
.
no, that too is not true - nor can it be made to be real without proof whether you are religious or not.
 

ding

Confront reality
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
85,767
Reaction score
9,231
Points
2,070
Location
Houston
"Everything is evidence for gods!"

So painfully fallacious and stupid.
Considering you dismiss everything there's no real difference.
Well, except for a burden of proof. A compelling argument to believe something. But yeah, other than the most important difference there is: no difference.. Good one.
You mean other than Jesus Christ, Patrick?

Yeah, that was provided too. The first cause can be no thing.

Now where's your evidence that God doesn't exist, Patrick?
.
The first cause can be no thing.
.
is that suppose to make sense - * repeating it really isn't helping your cause ... whatever that might be.

physiology is a physical, metaphysical substance and proof the metaphysical "can be" - physical. and is a "thing" {sic}.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
no, retard, that's not true. spirituality is comprehensible without being a thing by a thing that's how it works ... try and put the marbles back in the bag - hopefully that will help. you.
A two dimensional being would have an easier time trying to understand your third dimension than you - a three dimensional being - would in trying to understand a non-dimensional being outside of space time.

So you can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
"Everything is evidence for gods!"

So painfully fallacious and stupid.
Considering you dismiss everything there's no real difference.
Well, except for a burden of proof. A compelling argument to believe something. But yeah, other than the most important difference there is: no difference.. Good one.
You mean other than Jesus Christ, Patrick?

Yeah, that was provided too. The first cause can be no thing.

Now where's your evidence that God doesn't exist, Patrick?
.
The first cause can be no thing.
.
is that suppose to make sense - * repeating it really isn't helping your cause ... whatever that might be.

physiology is a physical, metaphysical substance and proof the metaphysical "can be" - physical. and is a "thing" {sic}.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
no, retard, that's not true. spirituality is comprehensible without being a thing by a thing that's how it works ... try and put the marbles back in the bag - hopefully that will help. you.
A two dimensional being would have an easier time trying to understand your third dimension than you - a three dimensional being - would in trying to understand a non-dimensional being outside of space time.

So you can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
So you can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.

no, retard, that's not true. spirituality is comprehensible without being a thing by a thing that's how it works ... try and put the marbles back in the bag - hopefully that will help. you.

A two dimensional being would have an easier time trying to understand your third dimension than you - a three dimensional being - would in trying to understand a non-dimensional being outside of space time.
.
A two dimensional being ...
.
:iyfyus.jpg:
.
where have you proven matter or energy have not existed.

Matter and energy were created from nothing by God. That's a core monotheistic belief.
.
Matter and energy were created from nothing by God. That's a core monotheistic belief.
.
no, that too is not true - nor can it be made to be real without proof whether you are religious or not.
A Creator God absolutely is a core belief of monotheism. Monotheism rejects the unscientific belief that gods control all aspects of the material world. That's called magic and that's the error that people like FortFun make when discussing Christianity. The birth of monotheism - Abram - rejected the polytheistic beliefs that different gods control different things. If your takeaway from the Bible that that is what the Bible teaches then you are reading it wrong.
 

ChemEngineer

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2019
Messages
3,176
Reaction score
2,591
Points
1,940
“In Hitler’s eyes Christianity was a religion fit only for slaves,” wrote Alan Bullock “Hitler, A Study in Tyranny,” a seminal biography. “Its teaching, he declared, was a rebellion against the natural law of selection by struggle of the fittest.”



Bullock, in describing Hitler as a “rationalist and materialist,” quotes him in a wartime conversation with aides as saying:

The dogma of Christianity gets worn away before the advances of science ... Gradually the myths crumble. All that is left to prove that nature there is no frontier between the organic and inorganic. When understanding of the universe has become widespread, when the majority of men know that the stars are not sources of light, but worlds, perhaps inhabited worlds like ours, then the Christian doctrine will be convicted of absurdity.

By 1942, Hitler vowed, according to Bullock, to “root out and destroy the influence of the Christian Churches,” describing them as “the evil that is gnawing our vitals.”



------------------------
Hitler was an atheist when he slaughtered millions and invaded Europe. Atheists have this to lie about relentlessly, as they do with everything.
 

BreezeWood

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
11,110
Reaction score
665
Points
85
"Everything is evidence for gods!"

So painfully fallacious and stupid.
Considering you dismiss everything there's no real difference.
Well, except for a burden of proof. A compelling argument to believe something. But yeah, other than the most important difference there is: no difference.. Good one.
You mean other than Jesus Christ, Patrick?

Yeah, that was provided too. The first cause can be no thing.

Now where's your evidence that God doesn't exist, Patrick?
.
The first cause can be no thing.
.
is that suppose to make sense - * repeating it really isn't helping your cause ... whatever that might be.

physiology is a physical, metaphysical substance and proof the metaphysical "can be" - physical. and is a "thing" {sic}.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
no, retard, that's not true. spirituality is comprehensible without being a thing by a thing that's how it works ... try and put the marbles back in the bag - hopefully that will help. you.
A two dimensional being would have an easier time trying to understand your third dimension than you - a three dimensional being - would in trying to understand a non-dimensional being outside of space time.

So you can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
"Everything is evidence for gods!"

So painfully fallacious and stupid.
Considering you dismiss everything there's no real difference.
Well, except for a burden of proof. A compelling argument to believe something. But yeah, other than the most important difference there is: no difference.. Good one.
You mean other than Jesus Christ, Patrick?

Yeah, that was provided too. The first cause can be no thing.

Now where's your evidence that God doesn't exist, Patrick?
.
The first cause can be no thing.
.
is that suppose to make sense - * repeating it really isn't helping your cause ... whatever that might be.

physiology is a physical, metaphysical substance and proof the metaphysical "can be" - physical. and is a "thing" {sic}.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
no, retard, that's not true. spirituality is comprehensible without being a thing by a thing that's how it works ... try and put the marbles back in the bag - hopefully that will help. you.
A two dimensional being would have an easier time trying to understand your third dimension than you - a three dimensional being - would in trying to understand a non-dimensional being outside of space time.

So you can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
So you can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.

no, retard, that's not true. spirituality is comprehensible without being a thing by a thing that's how it works ... try and put the marbles back in the bag - hopefully that will help. you.

A two dimensional being would have an easier time trying to understand your third dimension than you - a three dimensional being - would in trying to understand a non-dimensional being outside of space time.
.
A two dimensional being ...
.
:iyfyus.jpg:
.
where have you proven matter or energy have not existed.

Matter and energy were created from nothing by God. That's a core monotheistic belief.
.
Matter and energy were created from nothing by God. That's a core monotheistic belief.
.
no, that too is not true - nor can it be made to be real without proof whether you are religious or not.
A Creator God absolutely is a core belief of monotheism. Monotheism rejects the unscientific belief that gods control all aspects of the material world. That's called magic and that's the error that people like FortFun make when discussing Christianity. The birth of monotheism - Abram - rejected the polytheistic beliefs that different gods control different things. If your takeaway from the Bible that that is what the Bible teaches then you are reading it wrong.
.
A Creator God absolutely is a core belief of monotheism. Monotheism rejects the unscientific belief that gods control all aspects of the material world.
.
were that true what is meant by monotheism there still is not a meaningful link to the christian bible or any of the scriptures of the desert religions giving credence to their particular beliefs - and gives light for an alternative reason for the demise of monotheism, modern science other than the histories of the desert religions that in themselves repudiates those religions irregardless the ism they are practiced under.
.
And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness:
.
just after the above is where the forgeries and fallacies of the christian bible would have an honest person set aside the document to preserve their spiritual well being ... the above does clearly make the christian god a leader and not a singular entity that is the metaphysical underpinnings to creation that does give question to monotheism as interpreted by christians if that is the case. in their own, pluralistic publication or their makebelive messiah as a monotheism by trinity - quackery.
 

ding

Confront reality
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
85,767
Reaction score
9,231
Points
2,070
Location
Houston
"Everything is evidence for gods!"

So painfully fallacious and stupid.
Considering you dismiss everything there's no real difference.
Well, except for a burden of proof. A compelling argument to believe something. But yeah, other than the most important difference there is: no difference.. Good one.
You mean other than Jesus Christ, Patrick?

Yeah, that was provided too. The first cause can be no thing.

Now where's your evidence that God doesn't exist, Patrick?
.
The first cause can be no thing.
.
is that suppose to make sense - * repeating it really isn't helping your cause ... whatever that might be.

physiology is a physical, metaphysical substance and proof the metaphysical "can be" - physical. and is a "thing" {sic}.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
no, retard, that's not true. spirituality is comprehensible without being a thing by a thing that's how it works ... try and put the marbles back in the bag - hopefully that will help. you.
A two dimensional being would have an easier time trying to understand your third dimension than you - a three dimensional being - would in trying to understand a non-dimensional being outside of space time.

So you can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
"Everything is evidence for gods!"

So painfully fallacious and stupid.
Considering you dismiss everything there's no real difference.
Well, except for a burden of proof. A compelling argument to believe something. But yeah, other than the most important difference there is: no difference.. Good one.
You mean other than Jesus Christ, Patrick?

Yeah, that was provided too. The first cause can be no thing.

Now where's your evidence that God doesn't exist, Patrick?
.
The first cause can be no thing.
.
is that suppose to make sense - * repeating it really isn't helping your cause ... whatever that might be.

physiology is a physical, metaphysical substance and proof the metaphysical "can be" - physical. and is a "thing" {sic}.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
You can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
no, retard, that's not true. spirituality is comprehensible without being a thing by a thing that's how it works ... try and put the marbles back in the bag - hopefully that will help. you.
A two dimensional being would have an easier time trying to understand your third dimension than you - a three dimensional being - would in trying to understand a non-dimensional being outside of space time.

So you can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.
.
So you can't comprehend a "no thing" because you are a thing.

no, retard, that's not true. spirituality is comprehensible without being a thing by a thing that's how it works ... try and put the marbles back in the bag - hopefully that will help. you.

A two dimensional being would have an easier time trying to understand your third dimension than you - a three dimensional being - would in trying to understand a non-dimensional being outside of space time.
.
A two dimensional being ...
.
:iyfyus.jpg:
.
where have you proven matter or energy have not existed.

Matter and energy were created from nothing by God. That's a core monotheistic belief.
.
Matter and energy were created from nothing by God. That's a core monotheistic belief.
.
no, that too is not true - nor can it be made to be real without proof whether you are religious or not.
A Creator God absolutely is a core belief of monotheism. Monotheism rejects the unscientific belief that gods control all aspects of the material world. That's called magic and that's the error that people like FortFun make when discussing Christianity. The birth of monotheism - Abram - rejected the polytheistic beliefs that different gods control different things. If your takeaway from the Bible that that is what the Bible teaches then you are reading it wrong.
.
A Creator God absolutely is a core belief of monotheism. Monotheism rejects the unscientific belief that gods control all aspects of the material world.
.
were that true what is meant by monotheism there still is not a meaningful link to the christian bible or any of the scriptures of the desert religions giving credence to their particular beliefs - and gives light for an alternative reason for the demise of monotheism, modern science other than the histories of the desert religions that in themselves repudiates those religions irregardless the ism they are practiced under.
.
And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness:
.
just after the above is where the forgeries and fallacies of the christian bible would have an honest person set aside the document to preserve their spiritual well being ... the above does clearly make the christian god a leader and not a singular entity that is the metaphysical underpinnings to creation that does give question to monotheism as interpreted by christians if that is the case. in their own, pluralistic publication or their makebelive messiah as a monotheism by trinity - quackery.
I will give 5 bucks to anyone who can tell me what you just said.
 

Hollie

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
40,843
Reaction score
5,619
Points
1,830
“In Hitler’s eyes Christianity was a religion fit only for slaves,” wrote Alan Bullock “Hitler, A Study in Tyranny,” a seminal biography. “Its teaching, he declared, was a rebellion against the natural law of selection by struggle of the fittest.”



Bullock, in describing Hitler as a “rationalist and materialist,” quotes him in a wartime conversation with aides as saying:

The dogma of Christianity gets worn away before the advances of science ... Gradually the myths crumble. All that is left to prove that nature there is no frontier between the organic and inorganic. When understanding of the universe has become widespread, when the majority of men know that the stars are not sources of light, but worlds, perhaps inhabited worlds like ours, then the Christian doctrine will be convicted of absurdity.

By 1942, Hitler vowed, according to Bullock, to “root out and destroy the influence of the Christian Churches,” describing them as “the evil that is gnawing our vitals.”



------------------------
Hitler was an atheist when he slaughtered millions and invaded Europe. Atheists have this to lie about relentlessly, as they do with everything.

I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so.

Adolf Hitler


We are a people of different faiths, but we are one. Which faith conquers the other is not the question; rather, the question is whether Christianity stands or falls.... We tolerate no one in our ranks who attacks the ideas of Christianity... in fact our movement is Christian. We are filled with a desire for Catholics and Protestants to discover one another in the deep distress of our own people.

Adolf Hitler


The National Government will regard it as its first and foremost duty to revive in the nation the spirit of unity and cooperation. It will preserve and defend those basic principles on which our nation has been built. It regards Christianity as the foundation of our national morality, and the family as the basis of national life.

Adolf Hitler



In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and of adders.

Adolf Hitler
 

BreezeWood

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
11,110
Reaction score
665
Points
85
“In Hitler’s eyes Christianity was a religion fit only for slaves,” wrote Alan Bullock “Hitler, A Study in Tyranny,” a seminal biography. “Its teaching, he declared, was a rebellion against the natural law of selection by struggle of the fittest.”



Bullock, in describing Hitler as a “rationalist and materialist,” quotes him in a wartime conversation with aides as saying:

The dogma of Christianity gets worn away before the advances of science ... Gradually the myths crumble. All that is left to prove that nature there is no frontier between the organic and inorganic. When understanding of the universe has become widespread, when the majority of men know that the stars are not sources of light, but worlds, perhaps inhabited worlds like ours, then the Christian doctrine will be convicted of absurdity.

By 1942, Hitler vowed, according to Bullock, to “root out and destroy the influence of the Christian Churches,” describing them as “the evil that is gnawing our vitals.”



------------------------
Hitler was an atheist when he slaughtered millions and invaded Europe. Atheists have this to lie about relentlessly, as they do with everything.

I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so.

Adolf Hitler


We are a people of different faiths, but we are one. Which faith conquers the other is not the question; rather, the question is whether Christianity stands or falls.... We tolerate no one in our ranks who attacks the ideas of Christianity... in fact our movement is Christian. We are filled with a desire for Catholics and Protestants to discover one another in the deep distress of our own people.

Adolf Hitler


The National Government will regard it as its first and foremost duty to revive in the nation the spirit of unity and cooperation. It will preserve and defend those basic principles on which our nation has been built. It regards Christianity as the foundation of our national morality, and the family as the basis of national life.

Adolf Hitler



In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and of adders.

Adolf Hitler
.
By 1942, Hitler vowed

I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so.
.
germany was then and is now a christian, bible belt country and overwhelmingly supported hitler, whatever hitler may have said about them ...

A plebiscite vote was held on August 19 1934 that brought Hitler a 90 percent majority.
.
they admired hitler the same as christians admire today donald trump.
 

buttercup

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
5,355
Reaction score
3,265
Points
1,020
Here presented and refuted are 3 BIG lies that Atheists spread about Christianity.
Go ahead an summarize in your own words ina couple of sentences. I am not watching a video you never watched.
In general, Atheistic leaders have killed far more CHRISTIANS, then Christians have ever killed anyone in general. This includes all the Crusades, and centuries of the Inquisition, and witch executions. I believe what was done in the name of Christianity was very terrible and sad. However, atheists don't care what they have done to Christians in the past, present or future ---- nor anyone who disagrees with them. Atheists like Sam Harris, Bill Maher, Christopher Harris and Nicolas Humphreys have said very bias and discriminatory remarks against religious people and specifically Christians --- whom they outright say they hate, and want them silenced.
.
In general, Atheistic leaders have killed far more CHRISTIANS, then Christians have ever killed anyone in general.
.
there has not been a century christians have not been at the forefront of persecution and victimization of the innocent -
.
View attachment 497165
.
christianity is foremost a terrorist organization and has had their way since the 4th century - the 20th century uprisings and reprisals against christianity were of their own making and vindication against the corrupt organization.
Why would a CHRISTIAN acting as a child of GOD, burn down a cross that represents CHRIST shedding his blood so ANYONE who believes might be saved. And why would any CHRISTIAN, who loves the LORD wear a mask.

Your's is another lie to add to the list. Atheists have lived in every century also. When Cane killed Abel, and tried to lie to GOD, was he acting as a believer or an ATHEIST. I believe Cane was perhaps the first atheist, because he certainly had no clue that GOD already knew that he had murdered his brother. Cane apparently thought he could hide things from GOD. That doesn't sound like someone who believed in ALMIGHTY GOD.

I wouldn't even bother with him, he is the biggest troll in this section, I'm amazed he's even still allowed to post here. He's a one-trick pony troll.
 

buttercup

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
5,355
Reaction score
3,265
Points
1,020
Here presented and refuted are 3 BIG lies that Atheists spread about Christianity.
Go ahead an summarize in your own words ina couple of sentences. I am not watching a video you never watched.
In general, Atheistic leaders have killed far more CHRISTIANS, then Christians have ever killed anyone in general. This includes all the Crusades, and centuries of the Inquisition, and witch executions. I believe what was done in the name of Christianity was very terrible and sad. However, atheists don't care what they have done to Christians in the past, present or future ---- nor anyone who disagrees with them. Atheists like Sam Harris, Bill Maher, Christopher Harris and Nicolas Humphreys have said very bias and discriminatory remarks against religious people and specifically Christians --- whom they outright say they hate, and want them silenced.
.
In general, Atheistic leaders have killed far more CHRISTIANS, then Christians have ever killed anyone in general.
.
there has not been a century christians have not been at the forefront of persecution and victimization of the innocent -
.
View attachment 497165
.
christianity is foremost a terrorist organization and has had their way since the 4th century - the 20th century uprisings and reprisals against christianity were of their own making and vindication against the corrupt organization.
Why would a CHRISTIAN acting as a child of GOD, burn down a cross that represents CHRIST shedding his blood so ANYONE who believes might be saved. And why would any CHRISTIAN, who loves the LORD wear a mask.

Your's is another lie to add to the list. Atheists have lived in every century also. When Cane killed Abel, and tried to lie to GOD, was he acting as a believer or an ATHEIST. I believe Cane was perhaps the first atheist, because he certainly had no clue that GOD already knew that he had murdered his brother. Cane apparently thought he could hide things from GOD. That doesn't sound like someone who believed in ALMIGHTY GOD.

I wouldn't even bother with him, he is the biggest troll in this section, I'm amazed he's even still allowed to post here. He's a one-trick pony troll.
.
I wouldn't even bother with him, he is the biggest troll in this section, I'm amazed he's even still allowed to post here. He's a one-trick pony troll.
.
try not to run away and you'll know for certain - singing to your choir, nothing new there.

and being an avowed sinner somehow makes you special ... christian.

It must be hard to live with that much hate. I truly feel sorry for you.
 

BreezeWood

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
11,110
Reaction score
665
Points
85
Here presented and refuted are 3 BIG lies that Atheists spread about Christianity.
Go ahead an summarize in your own words ina couple of sentences. I am not watching a video you never watched.
In general, Atheistic leaders have killed far more CHRISTIANS, then Christians have ever killed anyone in general. This includes all the Crusades, and centuries of the Inquisition, and witch executions. I believe what was done in the name of Christianity was very terrible and sad. However, atheists don't care what they have done to Christians in the past, present or future ---- nor anyone who disagrees with them. Atheists like Sam Harris, Bill Maher, Christopher Harris and Nicolas Humphreys have said very bias and discriminatory remarks against religious people and specifically Christians --- whom they outright say they hate, and want them silenced.
.
In general, Atheistic leaders have killed far more CHRISTIANS, then Christians have ever killed anyone in general.
.
there has not been a century christians have not been at the forefront of persecution and victimization of the innocent -
.
View attachment 497165
.
christianity is foremost a terrorist organization and has had their way since the 4th century - the 20th century uprisings and reprisals against christianity were of their own making and vindication against the corrupt organization.
Why would a CHRISTIAN acting as a child of GOD, burn down a cross that represents CHRIST shedding his blood so ANYONE who believes might be saved. And why would any CHRISTIAN, who loves the LORD wear a mask.

Your's is another lie to add to the list. Atheists have lived in every century also. When Cane killed Abel, and tried to lie to GOD, was he acting as a believer or an ATHEIST. I believe Cane was perhaps the first atheist, because he certainly had no clue that GOD already knew that he had murdered his brother. Cane apparently thought he could hide things from GOD. That doesn't sound like someone who believed in ALMIGHTY GOD.

I wouldn't even bother with him, he is the biggest troll in this section, I'm amazed he's even still allowed to post here. He's a one-trick pony troll.
.
I wouldn't even bother with him, he is the biggest troll in this section, I'm amazed he's even still allowed to post here. He's a one-trick pony troll.
.
try not to run away and you'll know for certain - singing to your choir, nothing new there.

and being an avowed sinner somehow makes you special ... christian.

It must be hard to live with that much hate. I truly feel sorry for you.
.
It must be hard to live with that much hate. I truly feel sorry for you.
.
you needn't bother - that was your post, sinner.

unlike you I have not abandoned the Religion of Antiquity and embrace the challenge necessary for admission to the Everlasting.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$350.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top