At least two Republican DAs want to prosecute Bidens: Rep. James Comer

While a few Republican DA's are hungry to get Biden, Hunter, et al., seems they are querying Comer for the dirt they can use to indict. Now we shall see if Comer's mouth is bigger than his plate. I suspect there's nothing on it to chew on, but it sure looks nice from a distance.

As my learned colleagues in academia are wont to say, the New York Post, founded by Alexander Hamilton, would not recognize what it has become. While it may not be a full-on tabloid, it bears all the hallmarks of one. Its appearance and style are reminiscent of the best of British tabloids, although it is not the kind of publication that garners awards for excellence in journalism. In fact, it has only managed to lay claim to one Pulitzer Prize, which is hardly an impressive record for any self-respecting journal of record. One might say that the NYPost exists somewhere between a serious news publication and a tabloid, but with its brazen and sensationalistic headlines, it sure looks like a tabloid to me. In the immortal words of that old adage, "if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck,....and you know the rest."



WASHINGTON — At least two local GOP prosecutors are looking at ways to charge President Biden and his family amid Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s prosecution of former President Donald Trump, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer revealed Wednesday.

“I had two calls yesterday, one from a county attorney in Kentucky and one from a county attorney in Tennessee,” Comer (R-Ky.) told “Fox & Friends.” “They were Republican, obviously, both states are heavily Republican. They want to know if there are ways they can go after the Bidens now.”

Comer is leading a House Republican investigation into Joe Biden’s role in his family’s international business dealings in countries such as China and Ukraine. The lawmaker’s staff recently reviewed Suspicious Activity Reports filed by banks to the Treasury Department regarding possible criminal activity by the Biden family.
Well, since the DOJ has been transformed to Biden’s Consilgliare, the local DAs now have an obligation to pursue the Biden Crime Family
 
Bragg campaigned on holding a famous criminal accountable, as DAs often do. THat that famous person was Trump, was not an arbitrary fact, it was based on the fact that he is listed as a non-indicted co-conspirator in a campaign finance crime. Out of the federal crime, he found 34 counts of a state crime, which can be enhanced to a felony, owing that they were designed to conceal the hush money payments, and there is the tax deception, as well.
A non-disclosure agreement is perfectly legal, so there was no illegal "hush money."

Any tax deception was on the part of convicted tax evader Michael cohen.
Your statement is false.

Pomerantz and Dunne resigned over an entirely different evidentiary path and potential prosecution, their path was the evidence accumulated in the Trump Org indictment. Bragg decided to go after the filing falsifying documents misdemeanor enhanced to a felony because the 34 counts were designed to conceal the Daniel's hush money payments.
So, now you just make up stuff.


Two top prosecutors leading the criminal investigation into former President Donald Trump and his business resigned after the Manhattan district attorney said he was not prepared to authorize an indictment against the former President, a person familiar with the investigation said.



The New York Times, citing sources, reported that the grand jury investigation had stalled, with no sessions in the last month, and that Dunne and Pomerantz quit after Bragg raised doubts about pursuing a case against Trump himself.

 
You need to have a talk with Bragg and tell him that you believe he's wrong about what he said.
i'm certainly not qualified.

But the system prevents an AG from wrongly indicting, the grand jury system. If the evidence doesnt support the charges, the grand jury wouldnt indict. But as far as linking state crimes to a federal crime, only the New York appeals court can judge that.

But before then, we'll see charges from Fulton County GA, and Jack Smith on the document theft.
 
i'm certainly not qualified.

But the system prevents an AG from wrongly indicting, the grand jury system. If the evidence doesnt support the charges, the grand jury wouldnt indict. But as far as linking state crimes to a federal crime, only the New York appeals court can judge that.

But before then, we'll see charges from Fulton County GA, and Jack Smith on the document theft.
Georgia is another over reach since it's a federal election issue. Nice try though :abgg2q.jpg:
 
dont you remember trump asking for 11,780 votes?
That is entirely within the state of Georgia.
And includes perjury from witnesses and possible racketeering.
And it's a federal issue not a state issues FEDERAL elections violations is not a state issue.
 
A non-disclosure agreement is perfectly legal, so there was no illegal "hush money."

Any tax deception was on the part of convicted tax evader Michael cohen.

So, now you just make up stuff.


Two top prosecutors leading the criminal investigation into former President Donald Trump and his business resigned after the Manhattan district attorney said he was not prepared to authorize an indictment against the former President, a person familiar with the investigation said.



The New York Times, citing sources, reported that the grand jury investigation had stalled, with no sessions in the last month, and that Dunne and Pomerantz quit after Bragg raised doubts about pursuing a case against Trump himself.

Boy, you sure are in for a shock.
 
And it's a federal issue not a state issues FEDERAL elections violations is not a state issue.
Trump broke both georgia state law and federal law.
When somebody violates a state law, then that state prosecutes that law.

Federal law makes it a crime to “willfully fail or refuse to tabulate, count, and report such person’s vote,”

It is a federal felony to knowingly attempt “to deprive or defraud the residents of a State of a fair and impartially conducted election process” through “the procurement, casting, or tabulation of ballots that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held.”

Georgia, state law makes it a crime to, “with intent that another person engage in conduct constituting a felony,” solicit another person to commit such a felony. A person convicted of soliciting a felony in Georgia “shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than three years”

Georgia law also specifically makes it a crime to engage in “criminal solicitation to commit election fraud.”
 
Trump broke both georgia state law and federal law.
When somebody violates a state law, then that state prosecutes that law.

Federal law makes it a crime to “willfully fail or refuse to tabulate, count, and report such person’s vote,”

It is a federal felony to knowingly attempt “to deprive or defraud the residents of a State of a fair and impartially conducted election process” through “the procurement, casting, or tabulation of ballots that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held.”

Georgia, state law makes it a crime to, “with intent that another person engage in conduct constituting a felony,” solicit another person to commit such a felony. A person convicted of soliciting a felony in Georgia “shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than three years”

Georgia law also specifically makes it a crime to engage in “criminal solicitation to commit election fraud.”
State the Georgia statute that gives Georgia authority over federal elections and is the supreme law of the land?
 
State the Georgia statute that gives Georgia authority over federal elections and is the supreme law of the land?
federal elections, yea right.

do you know how democracy works in this country?

Each state runs its own elections for everything.
The votes for federal positions are sent to Washington DC, like the electoral votes for president for example. You might recall it takes about a month for a state to certify their electoral votes. Each state has their own laws on how elections are run.
 
federal elections, yea right.

do you know how democracy works in this country?

Each state runs its own elections for everything.
The votes for federal positions are sent to Washington DC, like the electoral votes for president for example. You might recall it takes about a month for a state to certify their electoral votes. Each state has their own laws on how elections are run.
Show me the word democracy in the US Constitution? Federal election laws are federal authority not state.
 
While a few Republican DA's are hungry to get Biden, Hunter, et al., seems they are querying Comer for the dirt they can use to indict. Now we shall see if Comer's mouth is bigger than his plate. I suspect there's nothing on it to chew on, but it sure looks nice from a distance.

As my learned colleagues in academia are wont to say, the New York Post, founded by Alexander Hamilton, would not recognize what it has become. While it may not be a full-on tabloid, it bears all the hallmarks of one. Its appearance and style are reminiscent of the best of British tabloids, although it is not the kind of publication that garners awards for excellence in journalism. In fact, it has only managed to lay claim to one Pulitzer Prize, which is hardly an impressive record for any self-respecting journal of record. One might say that the NYPost exists somewhere between a serious news publication and a tabloid, but with its brazen and sensationalistic headlines, it sure looks like a tabloid to me. In the immortal words of that old adage, "if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck,....and you know the rest."



WASHINGTON — At least two local GOP prosecutors are looking at ways to charge President Biden and his family amid Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s prosecution of former President Donald Trump, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer revealed Wednesday.

“I had two calls yesterday, one from a county attorney in Kentucky and one from a county attorney in Tennessee,” Comer (R-Ky.) told “Fox & Friends.” “They were Republican, obviously, both states are heavily Republican. They want to know if there are ways they can go after the Bidens now.”

Comer is leading a House Republican investigation into Joe Biden’s role in his family’s international business dealings in countries such as China and Ukraine. The lawmaker’s staff recently reviewed Suspicious Activity Reports filed by banks to the Treasury Department regarding possible criminal activity by the Biden family.
Verbose retard ^ said something. But then, who cares?
 
Food for thought, which our liberals won’t be able to follow:

The NY County indictment charges that the alleged crimes were committed on dates in 2017, after the 2016 election was over and after President Trump was already in office. Therefore, the persecutor is not claiming that the payments for the NDA constituted any crime. Instead, Bragg is contending that the later “book” entries (which he claims were false) were intended to conceal some other (but unidentified) supposed crime or crimes.

Since Bragg was scrupulous in not specifying what those other hypothetical crimes were, he is going to have to get pretty fucking specific in his pending Bill of Particulars.

The press conference he gave — just after President Trump’s arraignment — was a hodge podge of vague allegations (but don’t serve as a Bill of Particulars).

But the timing issue is gonna eventually screw Bragg’s legal theory to shit.

In short, Trump tried to get an NDA with a Ho and a playmate. As was legal, he arranged to pay for those NDA’s. Nothing illegal in that. But the eventual payment by Trump (repayment for Cohen’s fronting of the money) could not have been for the purpose of hiding it from the public, since the election was already over. Similarly, the supposedly “false” book entries couldn’t be to conceal anything from the voters, either. The voters had long since voted.

Bragg actually doesn’t have any case at all.

(This reserves for another day how ethically improper the persecutor’s press conference was as it was given that day. Most professional prosecutors couch their informative press releases or statements in a more professional manner. They say things like “by this indictment, it is alleged that the defendant did these things and it is alleged that he did them in order to accomplish particular goals.”

But not our lad Bragg. Oh no. He flat out declares that Trump “did” the acts and that Trump did them with particular purposes. The big oaf is trying his case in the press.)
 
Show me the word democracy in the US Constitution? Federal election laws are federal authority not state.
The Constitution was meant to foster a complex form of majority rule, not enable minority rule.

United States has both state level election laws for the elections in that state, and on top of that, election laws at the federal level.
 

Forum List

Back
Top