Assange = twat

The is the dark side to wiki leaks. While Wikileaks has informed the public about government's from around the world shady dealings. They are also revealing sensitive information that can also harm those involved.

This is an instance where this info could put these people's lives in danger or face shame from their family.

Very reckless on Assange's part.
 
The is the dark side to wiki leaks. While Wikileaks has informed the public about government's from around the world shady dealings. They are also revealing sensitive information that can also harm those involved.

This is an instance where this info could put these people's lives in danger or face shame from their family.

Very reckless on Assange's part.

But he had the information stored on a private server in his basement!
 
I love how this moron takes issue with the truth, and free speech. Not muslims and thier intolerance... What's the matter Tomi? Islam's the religion of peace remember? You support the muslims. What could go wrong?

You cannot out people. No one has the right to out someone's sexuality. They also don't have the right to out someone's HIV status.

This isn't a matter of fre speech. This is about people's privacy.
 
He's mad because Wikileaks embarrassed Hillary and the DNC. He doesn't give a flying fuck about this gay guy, whathisname.
 
The is the dark side to wiki leaks. While Wikileaks has informed the public about government's from around the world shady dealings. They are also revealing sensitive information that can also harm those involved.

This is an instance where this info could put these people's lives in danger or face shame from their family.

Very reckless on Assange's part.

Right. Especially Democrats.
 
Let's get this straight from the article. The source for the quote is your own link.
"Among the thousands of documents, the data includes personal information identifying at least one man with a gay sex conviction – as well as a number of rape victims and people living with HIV."
Identifying one man with gay sex conviction. So, if the only guy identified was already convicted by the Saudis then how could Wikileaks put him in jeopardy? Where are the rest of the people? The article cited says people as plural meaning many that have been identified.

You did not read the article, did you? hahaha... You are trolling mister....
Lol. Is it perchance 'Pink News' again?
 
How could wikiLeaks identify sodomites? If the gay community really cared about their culture they would be demonstrating in the streets of Saudi Arabia and Iran instead of worrying if North Carolina will let freakazoid men in the ladies room.
 

Forum List

Back
Top