Ashlii receives Military Honors

Fair question. At the very least, it would make much more sense he got shot.
So this is Washington State law not Washington D.C.:

📘 Washington Law (and General U.S. Principles)​

1. Unlawful Assembly / Riot

  • RCW 9A.84.020 – Failure to Disperse
    If you’re in a group of four or more where one or more are creating a “substantial risk of causing injury or property damage” and you refuse to disperse when ordered, you can be charged.
  • RCW 9A.84.010 – Riot
    If you’re with three or more persons and you use or threaten force in a way that causes substantial risk of injury or property damage, you can be charged with riot.

2. Accomplice Liability

  • RCW 9A.08.020 – Liability for Conduct of Another
    If you aid, encourage, or agree to help someone commit a crime, you can be charged as if you committed it yourself.
    👉 Even “just being there” in a mob can turn into liability if your presence is seen as supporting or encouraging.

3. Federal Law (Jan. 6 Context)​

  • 18 U.S.C. § 2101 – Riots
    It’s a federal crime to travel or act in interstate commerce with intent to participate in or encourage a riot.
  • Conspiracy & Aiding/Abetting
    Under federal law, if you join a mob where crimes are planned/committed, you can be held liable for the group’s collective actions — even if you didn’t personally smash glass.

✅ Bottom Line​

Being part of a mob doesn’t shield you because “I didn’t do it personally.”
  • If you’re present and acting in concert, you risk riot or unlawful assembly charges.
  • If you encourage, assist, or even refuse to leave, you risk accomplice liability.
  • Law treats the collective criminal intent as extending to each active participant.
 
Haha yes he’s a live and well

7fbfe87c2ddaf275c6c748391848509cd0-04-trump-unwell.rsquare.w400.jpg


^^^

that is not well.

& he has not been in the public eye for days.
 

New court documents filed this week in the case against four Minneapolis police officers charged in the death of George Floyd provide new context to how he died.

A memorandum filed by the Hennepin County Attorney’s office on June 1 indicated that chief medical examiner Dr. Andrew Baker, who listed Floyd’s death as a homicide, thought the amount of fentanyl in Floyd’s blood was “pretty high” and could be “a fatal level of fentanyl under normal circumstances.”

“[Dr. Baker] said that if Mr. Floyd had been found dead in his home (or anywhere else) and there were no other contributing factors he would conclude that it was an overdose death,” the memo said.
 

New court documents filed this week in the case against four Minneapolis police officers charged in the death of George Floyd provide new context to how he died.

A memorandum filed by the Hennepin County Attorney’s office on June 1 indicated that chief medical examiner Dr. Andrew Baker, who listed Floyd’s death as a homicide, thought the amount of fentanyl in Floyd’s blood was “pretty high” and could be “a fatal level of fentanyl under normal circumstances.”

“[Dr. Baker] said that if Mr. Floyd had been found dead in his home (or anywhere else) and there were no other contributing factors he would conclude that it was an overdose death,” the memo said.
Simple asphyxiation
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom