Ash Wed/ The Mark of the Beast

[HaShev]

It's amazing how far off your own scripture you guys get, which inadvertantly proves my points and validated them. Because it means even you don't believe your own texts that you need to oppose and change them and deflect in ways that no way match what your texts/preachers/ nor any theologian teach.=epic failed arguments.
Not one refutation that Jesus is indeed Lucifer and Rome created that image and one world religion to conquer through.

 

[LittleNipper]

It's amazing how far off your own scripture you guys get, which inadvertantly proves my points and validated them. Because it means even you don't believe your own texts that you need to oppose and change them and deflect in ways that no way match what your texts/preachers/ nor any theologian teach.=epic failed arguments.
Not one refutation that Jesus is indeed Lucifer and Rome created that image and one world religion to conquer through.

God is going to move the capital of Israel back to Jerusalem and the Antichrist is going to allow the rebuilding of the Jewish Temple. That dome of the rock will have to be destroyed first or possibly the Jewish Temple will sit on an adjacent spot. Anyway, since it seems likely that you will be left behind if the Messiah returns anytime soon --- please watch for these events to come about. You've been warned.

 

[hobelim]

It's amazing how far off your own scripture you guys get, which inadvertantly proves my points and validated them. Because it means even you don't believe your own texts that you need to oppose and change them and deflect in ways that no way match what your texts/preachers/ nor any theologian teach.=epic failed arguments.
Not one refutation that Jesus is indeed Lucifer and Rome created that image and one world religion to conquer through.

What you don't seem to get is that although the false sugar coated Jesus unleashed on the world by rome in 325 c.e. does not correspond to any real living being ever in existence it is a deliberate roman perversion of the Jesus that actually existed.

You can find no historical record of the Jesus that actually existed independent of the gospels because he was executed as a froward mental case of absolutely no account, a sinner and a drunk who ran around partying with bad characters and prostitutes while claiming to be a messenger from God, and then speaking in riddles, which made everyone except his closest friends, the sources of the gospels, think that he was insane.

Not the type of person any Roman or Jewish historian would have recorded as notable during brutal times of conquest and oppression. Even if he were alive today he probably wouldn't be nominated for man of the year. lol...

Ironically if Rome had not set out to desecrate his teachings and demonstrate hatred for the Hebrew God by making the worship of an edible triune mangod the compulsory focus of their national religion, perpetuating the teachings hidden in the fantastical stories about him, this teaching from God that came into the world through Jesus might never have seen the light of day..

 

[LittleNipper]

It's amazing how far off your own scripture you guys get, which inadvertantly proves my points and validated them. Because it means even you don't believe your own texts that you need to oppose and change them and deflect in ways that no way match what your texts/preachers/ nor any theologian teach.=epic failed arguments.
Not one refutation that Jesus is indeed Lucifer and Rome created that image and one world religion to conquer through.

What you don't seem to get is that although the false sugar coated Jesus unleashed on the world by rome in 325 c.e. does not correspond to any real living being ever in existence it is a deliberate roman perversion of the Jesus that actually existed.

You can find no historical record of the Jesus that actually existed independent of the gospels because he was executed as a froward mental case of absolutely no account, a sinner and a drunk who ran around partying with bad characters and prostitutes while claiming to be a messenger from God, and then speaking in riddles, which made everyone except his closest friends, the sources of the gospels, think that he was insane.

Not the type of person any Roman or Jewish historian would have recorded as notable during brutal times of conquest and oppression. Even if he were alive today he probably wouldn't be nominated for man of the year. lol...

Ironically if Rome had not set out to desecrate his teachings and demonstrate hatred for the Hebrew God by making the worship of an edible triune mangod the compulsory focus of their national religion, perpetuating the teachings hidden in the fantastical stories about him, this teaching from God that came into the world through Jesus might never have seen the light of day..

And you are aware of all this from exactly what documentation?

 

[LittleNipper]

Ancient non-Christian sources regarding Jesus: First, both Josephus and Lucian indicate that Jesus was regarded as wise. Second, Pliny, the Talmud, and Lucian imply He was a powerful and revered teacher. Third, both Josephus and the Talmud indicate He performed miraculous feats. Fourth, Tacitus, Josephus, the Talmud, and Lucian all mention that He was crucified. Tacitus and Josephus say this occurred under Pontius Pilate. And the Talmud declares it happened on the eve of Passover. Fifth, there are possible references to the Christian belief in Jesus' resurrection in both Tacitus and Josephus. Sixth, Josephus records that Jesus' followers believed He was the Christ, or Messiah. And finally, both Pliny and Lucian indicate that Christians worshipped Jesus as God!

 

[HaShev]

Ancient non-Christian sources regarding Jesus: First, both Josephus and Lucian indicate that Jesus was regarded as wise. Second, Pliny, the Talmud, and Lucian imply He was a powerful and revered teacher. Third, both Josephus and the Talmud indicate He performed miraculous feats. Fourth, Tacitus, Josephus, the Talmud, and Lucian all mention that He was crucified. Tacitus and Josephus say this occurred under Pontius Pilate. And the Talmud declares it happened on the eve of Passover. Fifth, there are possible references to the Christian belief in Jesus' resurrection in both Tacitus and Josephus. Sixth, Josephus records that Jesus' followers believed He was the Christ, or Messiah. And finally, both Pliny and Lucian indicate that Christians worshipped Jesus as God!

Wrong, Josephus is no longer a valid source now that it's proven Jesus doesn't appear in earlier copies, and magically is place out of sequence into Josephus texts around the time of Constantine and Eusephius the known great liar & forger.
The Talmud does not mention Jesus, it mentions Yeshu of 100bc, as I posted and proved is only a portion of the many characters used to make the Jesus fable. It's why Jesus is both stoned & hanged on a tree but also crucified, Because 1 figure Yeshu in Talmud dated in 100bc was stoned and hanged on Passover around 85bc, but the AD era crucified with the martyrs was a whole other character named Theudas by the Jordan, and neither of these 2 are the Galillean tax revolted (Yehuda) in the King Herod Lysanias
era. None of these characters had the death scene in your Jesus story, which was borrowed predated mythology of Baal. Jesus is the Baal myth retold to convert Jews. If the Christian God was YHWH then they'd name him such and not be spending millions and killing millions to convert them to the claimed same God.
NOTICE they never name this mysterious father, yet they use Baal's birthday, symbols, mythology and call Jesus his son as per Rev 22:16 morning star is known to be Baal and Ishtar(Easter's) son.

 

[hobelim]

It's amazing how far off your own scripture you guys get, which inadvertantly proves my points and validated them. Because it means even you don't believe your own texts that you need to oppose and change them and deflect in ways that no way match what your texts/preachers/ nor any theologian teach.=epic failed arguments.
Not one refutation that Jesus is indeed Lucifer and Rome created that image and one world religion to conquer through.

What you don't seem to get is that although the false sugar coated Jesus unleashed on the world by rome in 325 c.e. does not correspond to any real living being ever in existence it is a deliberate roman perversion of the Jesus that actually existed.

You can find no historical record of the Jesus that actually existed independent of the gospels because he was executed as a froward mental case of absolutely no account, a sinner and a drunk who ran around partying with bad characters and prostitutes while claiming to be a messenger from God, and then speaking in riddles, which made everyone except his closest friends, the sources of the gospels, think that he was insane.

Not the type of person any Roman or Jewish historian would have recorded as notable during brutal times of conquest and oppression. Even if he were alive today he probably wouldn't be nominated for man of the year. lol...

Ironically if Rome had not set out to desecrate his teachings and demonstrate hatred for the Hebrew God by making the worship of an edible triune mangod the compulsory focus of their national religion, perpetuating the teachings hidden in the fantastical stories about him, this teaching from God that came into the world through Jesus might never have seen the light of day..

And you are aware of all this from exactly what documentation?

The new testament.. Didn't you pay attention to what you were reading?

 

[surada]

View attachment 176580When Constantine formed his one world religion now called Christianity (worshipers of an image of their perceived Christs), to hide their political power behind, he did so with his sign (mark) of death (power of the beast in Rev 1) "the cross", which was the sign of death predating the Nazarenes, and a sign given him in his Luciferous light vision.
In turn this one world religion marked it's tools with this cross on their forehead and in hands with the remnants of burnt ash.
Today, during Ash Wed, you will see all the Roman subjects on TV, like the anouncers of programs, proudly show their enslavement in the system & it's deception, as they wear this mark on their foreheads proudly.
Well it's Ash Wed now, has anyone today received
"The Mark of the Beast"?- It's time to get the mark of the beast, on your forehead and on your
hand. Yes Ash Wed symbolizes the "Mark of the Beast". Why? Because the cross
is a symbol of "death" predating Christianity and Constantine was told by a LUCIFEROUS VISION to
put that MARK on his shields and go forth and conquer all.
The Beast=POWER/NATURE OF "death",
thus the mark of the Beast is the Cross (MARK OF DEATH).
Ash being charred remains after
"Fire BURNING".
They cause people to receive this mark on their fingers(hand) and on their forehead WARNED IN BOOK OF REV.
Still doubt what I'm saying then look
at this terminology I came across in a Clergy/Leaders' Mail-list No. 572 The
series was on The Marks of a Healthy Church.
>"Then we will study one
church - Antioch - and discover
>34 Marks of a church that is alive."

What are they referring to as marks? The mark upon the hand speaks of their control over our works of our hands,while the mark upon the forehead speaks
of control of what we think we know, in other words, controlling our
perceptions of what is truth and what is factual.

The beast (hierarchy) thus uses this mark on its subjects to label their own
little pawns while manipulating them like puppets.

The beast is in all ranks of their order, which they are enslaved through
the system that was engraved (marked) in them.

Nothing reveals this mark better then initiation into Roman Catholicism and
Ash Wednesday, where they dip the extremity of their right hand in the
chrism or ash (warned in Isaiah 44:20) proclaiming: 'I sign thee with the
sign of the cross' (mark of death) then draw the sign of the cross on the
forehead with the thumb. They proclaim this mark of the cross to be received
in their heart, meaning they are branding or marking them in spirit.

The Mark of the Beast can then be seen in this deeper aspect, as the path
you set for yourself - as in setting a mark out for yourself to get where
you're going.

The mark set by G0D is the straightest most successful path to where we
could and ought to be, but the Mark of the Beast is the path that leads us
astray, downhill and to destruction.

Once you see you are off-mark going in the wrong direction in society today,
then you must rethink your mark and consider where that mark is coming from
and where it's leading you. You'll then notice you've all been deceived and
following the mark of the beast not the mark (direction) of G0D.

Marking out where your path is set:

The mark of where you're going and where you want to be. The mark
Christianity takes and tries to project is in DEATH.

For they see death as their salvation and their achievements are in death
and reaching their kingdom is in, by, and through the portals of death. So
their worship is of death.

The mark Jews, Jehovah's Witnesses and many other cultures and faiths strive
for, is a perfection of this life we were graciously given.

So that we can live in peace, fulfilling all we could be and fulfilling all
our dreams for the enjoyment, happiness, love, and justice in life. In that we can pass this blessing onto our offspring as well- out of love and
bestowal.
So make the right choice, choose life.
"I have set before you life and
death, the blessing and the curse;
Therefore choose life, that you may live, you and your children."
Deuteronomy\Devarim: 30:19

The mark of the beast is Roman coin which was used all over the empire.