Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.....your mind is warped--no need to refute it --hasn't been proved..EXACTLY like saying there is a god--not need to prove there isn't a god when no one has proved there is oneI can't help noticing you still haven't refuted any of the evidence against him.MORE PROOF you act like a nazi--indicted does not mean guilty
E. Efforts to fire Mueller
Obstructive act (p. 87): Former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a “credible witness” in providing evidence that Trump indeed attempted to fire Mueller. This “would qualify as an obstructive act” if the firing “would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.”
Nexus (p. 89): “Substantial evidence” indicates that, at this point, Trump was aware that “his conduct was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present any evidence of federal crimes to a grand jury.”
Intent (p. 89): “Substantial evidence indicates that the President’s attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the President’s conduct[.]”
Really, so now you admit that Trump was elected via cheating and fraud. How nice of you to admit.No, because the game is rigged by those in control. It is 95% complete.Yeah, tens of millions of people cheated the system because there is no security in place to keep people from doing that...Trump clearly tried to influence the people in control of the election numbers to sway a positive result for him.
Cheating in the tens of millions column influenced the election
IOW, you can't refute the evidence. Got it......your mind is warped--no need to refute it
..it's innocent before guilty--not your nazi crapFace it. You are not equipped to deal with the facts......your mind is warped--no need to refute it
Really? MeBelle | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum ....Please don't try to tell anyone that the outcome exonerated him.The two impeachment aquitals prove nothing except that most Reblicans are spineless cowards that will not buck Trump or his base of moronic minionsNow all you need is proof.Cheating in the tens of millions column influenced the election
No proof is necessary as evidenced by 2 House impeachments. Democrats set the precident and now suddenly don’t want to follow it.
They came up with a cure for TDS. Its called getting your ass kicked by Joe Biden in the election.TDS: no sure, bend the curve. Post less demented TDS stuff than you did yesterday
Did you notice we don't have a justice system any more?Did you notice all his court cases failed due to a lack of evidence?All Trump ever did with any of his questioning was to try to get at the real results of the voting.
Boy! You're really mad... go drink some moonshine and hump your sister/wife. BubbaI didn't think a fucking idiot like you would figure it out... that was for the normal people to decide who is in more trouble in GA.Nice deflection. Trump is facing criminal charges. Warnock is under investigation (Repubs are pissed he won the election) because the voter registration organization he sat on the board of turned in some forms 10 days late. BTW, I reported your racist references to Warnock.Ok, you're being investigated by GA.....would you rather be Pres. Trump or this pavement ape?
BTW, I'm a Trumpanzee, remember? If you associate an ape reference to black people that's YOUR racist problem.
Filthy fucking animal.
It was proven he had unauthorized contact with Ruskies but get this, the GOP claimed the Dominion machines could not be manipulated by the Ruskies to change votes or create votes, then Trump says they can.. What a nut house.....just like Russian Collusion/etc--fool me once-----twice-shame on you--you are stupid
It's not the person. What you don't understand are the ideas and the ambition and balls it takes to get them done.I will never understand the slavish devotion of Trump's cult following to someone so undeserving.
So?Trump clearly tried to influence the people in control of the election numbers to sway a positive result for him.
Get better soon.“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion." Chomsky......due to the call he made to various state officials trying to convince them to change the result of their election, which Biden won. An act that was included in the single article of impeachment. Would you be astonished, as I am, to learn GA Repubs are trying to amend their constitution in order to protect Dear Leader?
Georgia Republicans Are Trying to Change the Rules for Fani Willis’s Prosecution of Donald Trump for Election Crimes
It’s been less than a week since Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis publicly began an investigation into Donald Trump‘s phone call to Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, and Georgia Republicans are already trying in earnest to change the rules that apply to prosecutions of election crimes.
Georgia state Republicans introduced a resolution Thursday that seeks to change the Georgia State Constitution to mandate the use of state-wide grand juries in prosecutions involving election crimes. The move would force prosecutors to draw more grand jurors from predominantly Republican rural areas of the state.
https://lawandcrime.com/2020-electi...secution-of-donald-trump-for-election-crimes/
Now that's blind devotion, right out in the open. Showing just how important GA Repubs believe the cult of personality surrounding Crooked Donald is to the fortunes of the POT.
That's not the only thing angry Repubs are doing in the wake of Don's defeat.
State GOP lawmakers propose flurry of voting restrictions to placate Trump supporters, spurring fears of a backlash
GOP state lawmakers across the country have proposed a flurry of voting restrictions that they say are needed to restore confidence in U.S. elections, an effort intended to placate supporters of former president Donald Trump who believe his false claims that the 2020 outcome was rigged.
But the effort is dividing Republicans, some of whom are warning that it will tar the GOP as the party of voter suppression and give Democrats ammunition to mobilize their supporters ahead of the 2022 midterms.
The proposals include measures that would curtail eligibility to vote by mail and prohibit the use of ballot drop boxes. One bill in Georgia would block early voting on Sundays, which critics quickly labeled a flagrant attempt to thwart Souls to the Polls, the Democratic turnout effort that targets Black churchgoers on the final Sunday before an election.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...fab224-72ca-11eb-85fa-e0ccb3660358_story.html
State Republicans push new voting restrictions after Trump’s loss
State Republicans push new voting restrictions after Trump’s loss
Pennsylvania G.O.P.’s Push for More Power Over Judiciary Raises Alarms
When the Pennsylvania Supreme Court unanimously rejected a Republican attempt to overturn the state’s election results in November, Justice David N. Wecht issued his own pointed rebuke, condemning the G.O.P. effort as “futile” and “a dangerous game.”
“It is not our role to lend legitimacy to such transparent and untimely efforts to subvert the will of Pennsylvania voters,” wrote Justice Wecht, a Democrat who was elected to a 10-year term on the bench in 2016. “Courts should not decide elections when the will of the voters is clear.”
Now Pennsylvania Republicans have a plan to make it less likely that judges like Justice Wecht get in their way.
Pennsylvania G.O.P.’s Push for More Power Over Judiciary Raises Alarms
It used to be losing elections caused a different kind of response. A recognition of the need to make changes to the party's message, working harder, organizing better, maybe raising more money. The POT's response, perhaps a reflection of Dear Leader's proclivity for cheating (he has done it his whole life), is to change the rules.
“Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality was tacitly denied by their philosophy." Orwell
And he clearly targeted more heavily black areas in his running diatribe, both in Georgia and in other states (PA, MI). So i can see how his legal team might be terrified of having too many minorities on the jury.Trump clearly tried to influence the people in control of the