As the War that “Will be over in a week or two” enters it’s 3rd Month, How much longer will US troops be there?

[kyzr]

Old news? It was March 1st sh!t brains?
Johnson said the same thing in 1965.

Tomorrow is May 1st "May Day" to you commie folks.

 

[candycorn]

We'll see. Stay tuned.

We're discussing Iran's nuclear program.

The parallels are stunning:

A draft-dodging GOP President who was itching to go to war cooked the intel to get the result he wanted.
Sound familiar?

Are you saying Iran has no enriched uranium? If so, you are wrong.

I'm sure they did.

Its not tiny Israel's job to protect the US.

No bomb Iran could have produced would reach US soil. But since you went there, are you saying its not our job to protect Israel?

Iran was a threat to the region and the US because of their ICBM development.

That exists only in your mind and the like minded fools who believe the shit you post here.

Prove me wrong.

Iran claimed to have enough uranium for 11 nuclear bombs, US envoy Witkoff says

Iranian officials told their US counterparts at crunch talks in Switzerland last week that the Islamic Republic possessed enough enriched material to build 11 nuclear bombs, President Trump’s…

nypost.com

“The 60% material, Sean, can be brought to 90%, that’s weapons-grade, in roughly one week, maybe 10 days at the outside. The 20% can be brought to weapons-grade inside of three to four weeks.”
“They were proud of it,” Witkoff went on. “They were proud that they had evaded all sorts of oversight protocols to get to a place where they could deliver 11 nuclear bombs.”

The NY Post...a tabloid quoting the Presidential lap dog. Wow.... You've proven yourself wrong that you have to lean on such dubious sources.

7 US troops were killed by Iran so far. How does that compare with any prior "war"?

13 have died in this clumsy misadventure for oil.

Wars have casualties, Trump is trying to win a war with minimal losses.

A war that didn't need to be fought.

What are Trump's demands? I believe this sentence is accurate:

"If we want to take away Iran's nuclear program we need to pay at the pump for a while, a small sacrifice for a big benefit."

Yeah, he's demanding we pay more for gas while he lies his a$$ off.

Again... the time period he sold damn fools like yourself expired 3 or 4 weeks ago. But you're still begging to be lied to some more. You should get in touch with a shelter...you're experiencing battered spouse syndrome.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[kyzr]

The parallels are stunning:
A draft-dodging GOP President who was itching to go to war cooked the intel to get the result he wanted. Sound familiar?

Not even close. The JCPOA proved Iran's intent to go nuclear. Iran cheated on the JCPOA even after Obama gave them $56,000,000,000 not to enrich uranium.
Suckers, Iran used the money to develop nukes and ICBMs.

I'm sure they did. (enrich uranium)

They admitted to having 460 kg of 60% enriched uranium, enough for 11 bombs, needing only a week or two to assemble them.

No bomb Iran could have produced would reach US soil. But since you went there, are you saying its not our job to protect Israel?

Iran lied about their ICBM program. Their missile fired at Diego Garcia now has a range of 3,000 miles, extending their range to reach the US isn't difficult.

That exists only in your mind and the like minded fools who believe the shit you post here.

You admitted that Iran has enriched uranium and an ICBM program. Stop being dense.

The NY Post...a tabloid quoting the Presidential lap dog. Wow.... You've proven yourself wrong that you have to lean on such dubious sources.

You can use google can't you??

Trump envoy Steve Witkoff says Iran claimed it had enough enriched uranium to make 11 nuclear bombs

President Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff told Fox News that Iranian negotiators said Iran had the "inalienable right to enrich all their nuclear fuel."

www.cbsnews.com

Witkoff: Iran said it had enough enriched uranium to make 11 nuclear bombs

President Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff told Fox News that Iranian negotiators said Iran had the "inalienable right to enrich all their nuclear fuel."

www.yahoo.com

13 have died in this clumsy misadventure for oil.

Not for oil, we have oil, the war is over nuclear weapons being developed by a state sponsor of terror.

A war that didn't need to be fought.

There is no way to deny Iran nuclear weapons without a war.
So you want Iran to have nuclear weapons, right?

Yeah, he's demanding we pay more for gas while he lies his a$$ off.

So you say.

Again... the time period he sold damn fools like yourself expired 3 or 4 weeks ago. But you're still begging to be lied to some more. You should get in touch with a shelter...you're experiencing battered spouse syndrome.

There is no time limit on a war, it takes what it takes.
There is a ceasefire, the blockade is working.
Why do you want Iran to get nukes and ICBMs? I don't.

 

[Zavulon]

Can't say. Didn't vote. Trump could declare victory and leave.

Or his Jew handlers could force him to keep going until Iran is destroyed, no matter how long it takes.

then, the Jews want Turkey, part of Arabia and Egypt for their Greater Israel plan. So, war will happen to the weak by the powerful. (Jewmerica)

View attachment 1249642

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Kuwait is almost 900KM from any sphere of Kurdish historical frontiers

My Bad for Not Dealing with the Netrix's Propensity for the Simplest Connections

I was focusing on not interfering with Iraq's government, which is relevant to taking back Kuwait, not to Kurdistan.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Dictatorship of the Petrotariat

Surely they have storage tanks to hold back transporting oil until its price rises. American oil, which created OPEC, must have taught them all the ways to gouge the consumers.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Not even close. The JCPOA proved Iran's intent to go nuclear. Iran cheated on the JCPOA even after Obama gave them $56,000,000,000 not to enrich uranium.
Suckers, Iran used the money to develop nukes and ICBMs.

They admitted to having 460 kg of 60% enriched uranium, enough for 11 bombs, needing only a week or two to assemble them.

Iran lied about their ICBM program. Their missile fired at Diego Garcia now has a range of 3,000 miles, extending their range to reach the US isn't difficult.

You admitted that Iran has enriched uranium and an ICBM program. Stop being dense.

You can use google can't you??

Trump envoy Steve Witkoff says Iran claimed it had enough enriched uranium to make 11 nuclear bombs

President Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff told Fox News that Iranian negotiators said Iran had the "inalienable right to enrich all their nuclear fuel."

www.cbsnews.com

Witkoff: Iran said it had enough enriched uranium to make 11 nuclear bombs

President Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff told Fox News that Iranian negotiators said Iran had the "inalienable right to enrich all their nuclear fuel."

www.yahoo.com

Not for oil, we have oil, the war is over nuclear weapons being developed by a state sponsor of terror.

There is no way to deny Iran nuclear weapons without a war.
So you want Iran to have nuclear weapons, right?

So you say.

There is no time limit on a war, it takes what it takes.
There is a ceasefire, the blockade is working.
Why do you want Iran to get nukes and ICBMs? I don't.

One God, One Sect

Iran played up the nuke issue so we would ignore their buildup of conventional weapons to conquer the Arabs and occupy Mecca.

 

[kyzr]

Iran played up the nuke issue so we would ignore their buildup of conventional weapons to conquer the Arabs and occupy Mecca.

Got a link for that? Sounds like a stretch.
More likely is Iran get nukes and then blackmails the Arabs, which is why the Arabs would all need to get nukes too.

 

[Zavulon]

Got a link for that? Sounds like a stretch.
More likely is Iran get nukes and then blackmails the Arabs, which is why the Arabs would all need to get nukes too.

Actually, in the modern world the only way to keep or restore real independence is to acquire nukes. Iraq, Syria and Lybia were quite convincing.

 

[kyzr]

Actually, in the modern world the only way to keep or restore real independence is to acquire nukes. Iraq, Syria and Libya were quite convincing.

Saddam, Assad, and Qaddafi are surely all convinced...

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

The rest of th eworld is already begining to supply oil from other locations. There's no real peace with Iran ever ... not those particular ones in charge. When they had no qualms about making 9 year olds cross mine fields in their war with Iraq, we got the hint that they dont value the same things as most of the world. It makes for a very skewed negotiating table. There also arent so many nations such as them with as many mine laying vessels... why do you think that is? do you think thats a sign of a country that just wants to get along? They already hated us.. and if the world hates us now.. they will get over it once the IRGC is gone. It would change the entire M.E. for the better. Whichever countries left who were also supporting terrorism could then be easily made to stop.

.

Nobody needs Iran's oil, except those who were getting it for nearly nothing, and now Iran is stuck with it all, as Trump will not let their ships out of the Strait. They have no choice except to shut down their wells, and they know how difficult it will be to get them pumping again after they do that.

Iran's economy is dead.

.

 

[Mac-7]

So nobody is willing to take a stand on when this latest round of GOP-created-middle-east-quagmire will end?

I dont know when it will end

But I know we can end the war on our terms if trump keeps up the pressure

 

[Zavulon]

Saddam, Assad, and Qaddafi are surely all convinced...

Yep. They gave up their WMD and WMD-programs and they lost their countries. Israel and North Korea acquired WMDs and they still in control of their own fate.
And if you think, that even closest allies of the USA don't think about it - think one more time.
And what will you do, when Brazil and Mexico starts their nuclear weapon programs?
Brazil already wanted naval reactors with 93% enriched Uranium. They temporarily refused this idea, and, as they said, changed the project to 60% Urainium, but they got 20% enriched Urainium in 1985, there is no international inspections and, formally, nobody knows if they are actually doing bombs or not.
Every time you bomb or invade another country, Brazilian pro-nuclear party got another pro-bomb argument.

 

[candycorn]

Your post about old news has nothing to do with today's position on the war.

Here is the most recent info...there is no time limit on the war...the blockade takes as long as it takes...

MSN

Trump tells aides to prepare for extended blockade of Iran​

Trump Tells Aides US Preparing For Extended Blockade

If confirmed, this constitutes another huge gamble by Trump - on both the economic and political fronts

www.gulf-insider.com

So there is “no time limit”...

Trump has given a time frame at least twice....

Is he right or are you right?

Let me guess...you’ll now say the impossible...that both of you are right.
This is what you guys do...cut reality to fit whatever the current conversation is.

 

[kyzr]

Yep. They gave up their WMD and WMD-programs and they lost their countries. Israel and North Korea acquired WMDs and they still in control of their own fate.
And if you think, that even closest allies of the USA don't think about it - think one more time.
And what will you do, when Brazil and Mexico starts their nuclear weapon programs?
Brazil already wanted naval reactors with 93% enriched Uranium. They temporarily refused this idea, and, as they said, changed the project to 60% Uranium, but they got 20% enriched Uranium in 1985, there is no international inspections and, formally, nobody knows if they are actually doing bombs or not.
Every time you bomb or invade another country, Brazilian pro-nuclear party got another pro-bomb argument.

Actually no one cares if Mexico or Brazil have nuclear weapons programs. They don't.
Why would they waste so much money on something they can't use?
Investing in AI or infrastructure would be much wiser.

 

[kyzr]

So there is “no time limit”...

Not really. It takes until Iran surrenders.

Trump has given a time frame at least twice....

I believe that was for thr bombing campaign to hit the 14,000 targets he wanted destroyed.
Now we're in a ceasefire, holding the blockade, seizing Iran's assets all over the world, until their financial system collapses.

Is he right or are you right?

Its not about 'who's right" its about Iran's oil economy.
They have no where to store any more oil, so they will start capping oil wells

Let me guess...you’ll now say the impossible...that both of you are right.
This is what you guys do...cut reality to fit whatever the current conversation is.

You need to look strategically at the situation and not try to nit-pick every statement made.
To his credit Trump wants Iran's nuclear program ended, a very important objective.
You should be supportive instead of critical.
You don't want Iran to get nuclear bombs or ICBMs do you?

 

[candycorn]

Its not about 'who's right" its about Iran's oil economy.

Sure it is because the longer this goes on, the worse the pain on American families.

Who gives a **** about Iran’s economy?

They have no where to store any more oil, so they will start capping oil wells

And this helps Americans how?

You need to look strategically at the situation and not try to nit-pick every statement made.

No. You need to at least try to be honest. I don’t think you can.

To his credit Trump wants Iran's nuclear program ended, a very important objective.
You should be supportive instead of critical.
You don't want Iran to get nuclear bombs or ICBMs do you?

They were nowhere near getting either so it’s a dumb-ass question asked by a dumbfuk.

 

[Zavulon]

Actually no one cares if Mexico or Brazil have nuclear weapons programs. They don't.
Why would they waste so much money on something they can't use?
Investing in AI or infrastructure would be much wiser.
View attachment 1250145

Same were Iranians. They not just prohibited nuclear weapons, their theocratic elites declared it sin. And Brazil is seeking possibility (or at least thinking about it) of making nuclear weapons for the very simple and obvious reason - because it's the only thing that potentially can deter Americans who see the whole Western Hemisphere as their backyard. If Brazilians want to be independent and wealthy (and they can become wealthy only if they are really independent) - they need nukes. Nuclear Brazil, potentially, is much more dangerous for the USA than nuclear Iran (at least because it's much closer), but both of them will be able to play only Minimal Deterrence (insurance from direct invasion and/or regime change). Given the lack of international inspections in Brazil, we can be sure that they have much more highly enriched Uranium and much more close to production of bigger amounts of nuclear bombs.

And the fact, that you attacked Iran, not Brazil, just prove that it's not about safety of the USA. It's all about oil and gas, in the best case.

 

[Mr Natural]

Four years is typical for a proper war. So sit back and enjoy the Iranian escapade while it lasts.