There is no noose... Newsflash! Even if for some wacky reason, the Mueller debacle can demonstrate that there was collusion; it will amount to nothing legally speaking. Collusion isn't a crime. This dog and pony show has one goal. And two purposes. To tarnish Trumps image in the hopes that the Dems regain the house, and enough clout to try and impeach him. Or besmirch his reputation in hopes of damaging his chances at reelection.
Going on 2 years now, multiple investigations, hundreds of hours, thousands of documents reviewed, and millions of tax dollars spent to wage a partisan 'revenge' 'witch hunt'.
Their investigation, and the tools they acquired / used in their investigation - like the Warrants to wiretap/survey the opposing political party candidate and his team during a Presidential election, were in large part based on an unsubstantiated, false report filled with Russian propaganda - reports provided by Russians - from a foreign spy through a company that was working for the Russians.
FISA Warrants are based on FACTS. The Trump Dossier is UN-SUBSTANTIATED. (It has not been fully proven, no matter what your OPINION is.) The FISA Warrants were ILLEGAL, and they are just another example of the type of prosecutorial misconduct Rosenstein and Mueller have been proven to have engaged in in the past. (They intentionally withheld information that could have kept innocent people out of jail and CREATED FALSE CRIMES, using them to send innocent people to jail. How those SOBs did NOT go to jail themselves after such perpetrating such act that ruined people's lives in mind-numbing.)
The evidence collected - by multiple Intel agencies, organizations, and people like the US IG - all but destroys the on-going witch hunt, showing how criminally far the left has to go to try to CREATE a crime and a case with which to take Trump down.
Going on 2 years not, Democrats - Rosenstein, Mueller, etc ... - can not even provide evidence to prove a crime was committed warranting an investigation, let alone a crime was committed Trump was involved in.
In response to this FACT, Democrats become triggered and immediately fire back that the indictment of 2 Trump associates for Tax Evasion dating back to 2006 - BEFORE OBAMA WAS EVEN ELECTED PRESIDENT - somehow equates to 'RUSSIAN COLLUSION' involving Trump.
In response to that FACT, Democrats claim the indictment of a self-important, unpaid Trump volunteer for 'Lying to the FBI' by not remembering everything about an overheard conversation between this DRUNK volunteer and a supposed Aussie Rep in a British Pub Bathroom somehow equates to 'RUSSIAN COLLUSION' involving Trump.
In response to this FACT, snowflakes think Flynn being indicted for 'Lying to the FBI' by the anti-Trump- Pro-Hillary extremist FIRED Mueller team member / FBI agent exposed as having protected Hillary from Prosecution as well protecting her 2 aides from being indicted on the same charge he made against a Trump-Associate SOMEHOW equates to 'RUSSIAN COLLUSION' involving Trump.
...and when all this smoke and mirrors BS is wiped away and we get to THE most important part of this entire WITCH HUNT...
DEMOCRATS STILL CAN NOT PROVIDE ANY EVIDENCE TO PROVE A CRIME WAS EVER COMMITTED WARRANTING AN INVESTIGATION!