Why do you even feel the need to placate a stupid question like that? Why forward them the luxury of controlling the terms of controversy? That's what they want you to do.
The assumption was, since I never needed a gun in the past, I don't need one now. I've run across this before. Even "you may have been carjacked but you didn't have a gun and are fine, unhurt." When the case went to court, the jackets home boys came to my house in the middle of the night. Had I not been armed I doubt they would have left me unhurt.
Very good. I shall keep that in mind.
If you think that Republicans or conservatives are the reason for today's societal decay, then you are one fake and dishonest political poster/political activist in life. Otherwise you are part of the problem by deflecting on who the real culprit's are by giving the leftist a pass after all that is known about their long history looking back now.
All programs created as a result of Democrat failure's in society and in governance. The history can't be hidden about it all....Even a child can read it and understand it all now, but of course that is why children have become the main focus of today's democrat's, otherwise how can they keep their bull crap going if they don't indoctrinate the children ??
Leftism can't propagate unless it's forced on minds too immature to question it.
If you took the time to read my post, it said, "Even Republican Presidents". In the Queen's English, you would gather from that that both Republican and Democrat presidents never had the balls. Then you carried on with presumptuous twaddle.
My Jack Russell says, "The AR-15 is not an appropriate gun to be freely walking around in society because of it's capabilities and power. They can, and have shown to be, quite a devastating consequence to innocent lives, especially children in the hands of nutters". Woof.
Again you deflect by blaming the gun's, and not looking at what has taken place in societies culture's over these long year's now. How can someone like you actually be believed in these debate's, because you start off being dishonest about the issue's ??
Perfect logic... Absolutely correct.
The AR-i5 is not a suitable gun in society, to be walking around in public with said rifle. Hand guns should conform to certain dimensions and again, they're not suitable to have when walking around in society. No gun is suitable within a public area.
You don't have enough education or cultural background to be commenting on what American's should have or shouldn't be doing with what they have.. You shouldn't be commenting on what their preferences in life should or shouldn't be, otherwise in concerning their self defence weapon's of choice, their sport weapon's of choice or their hunting weapon's of choice.
Why does that require a high capacity magazine?
