What bad acts did they do? How does it compare to what the Democratic Party did for 150 years?Indeed, yet it still doesn't dispel that GOP members were in the Klan.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What bad acts did they do? How does it compare to what the Democratic Party did for 150 years?Indeed, yet it still doesn't dispel that GOP members were in the Klan.
That kingdom is in every human now and is waiting for the soul to become conscious of how to obtain it through meditation and prayer.Understand first, that the Mosaic law is still in place at the time of Christ. Both Christ and the Jews He preaches to are under Law. But Christ is now promising the Kingdom that had been promised to Israel in the Old Testament, was at hand. He their King was bringing in the Kingdom.
The 'Sermon on the Mount' is the Law of that coming Kingdom. It is the Kingdom that John the Baptist first preached, (Matt. 3:1-2). And that Christ would preach. (Matt. 4:17) And (Matt. 5-7) are the laws of that Kingdom. And it is Law, even more strict than the Mosaic Law. Not just 'thou shalt not'. But did you want to?
Under that Kingdom rule, Jesus Christ, the King, will rule over Israel who in turn rules over the whole world. It is the 1000 year Kingdom reign as promised in the Old Testament . And He will rule with a rod of iron and in righteousness.
But that Kingdom never came. Because the Jews killed their King. And the Kingdom was not set up. It is yet for a future day, and it will come at Christ's 2nd Coming. But for now it is still future.
Point being, the laws of that future Kingdom cannot be expected to follow without Christ present on the earth ruling in righteousness. And those laws are to believing Israel at that time, who will be the leading nation of the world.
The Sermon on the Mount is not the law governing the Church. The Church didn't exist till (Acts 2). The Church operates under the Apostles teaching after the Church began. Most especially that of Paul.
In other word's you're attempt to apply something over the Church, which is not directed to the Church, is amiss.
Quantrill
You poh whites can't live with yer status.
Even Woodrow Wilson?That kingdom is in every human now and is waiting for the soul to become conscious of how to obtain it through meditation and prayer.
That kingdom is in every human now and is waiting for the soul to become conscious of how to obtain it through meditation and prayer.
Or history.I listen to God, I do not listen to humans..
Being lost in yer desire to have a homogeneous nation.
I listen to God, I do not listen to humans..
Ypu are no Christian, you forgot that Christ commanded you to love yer enemies not to hate them.
Freedom of speech does not need to be re-examined. What needs discussion and debate are consequences for filth speech. One of our most powerful laws is, Innocent until proven guilty. Therefore the glut of racist, Nazi, fascist, etc. must have consequences. Any government official should automatically forfeit his/her office. Media personnel are fired. Ordinary citizens face a hefty fine....based on Innocent until proven guilty. No one can call/label anyone 'racist, Nazi, fascist', etc. until proven beyond reasonable doubt according to the actual definition of that word. Instead, try 'buffoon', 'dunderhead', 'chump'.
So then does that mean we should love Satan?
Exactly as I would classify mocking somebody's murder as a hate crime.
Are you sure you want to criminalize the act of mocking someone's politics? ...
I was just thinking about this when I saw this video as this man says what I've been thinking all along and criticized on here for by mostly the left but even the right a bit,... That these people who go around celebrating the death of a man that was assassinated for simply just voicing his opinion.
I got told that Jesus wouldn't want me calling them demons and that's when I ask you all really? Really?? Isn't that how demons act? Aren't we supposed to call evil evil? Didn't Jesus Christ Himself drive away evil? Wouldn't Jesus Christ Himself be casting these evil entities out of these people?
That's where I got criticized again when I was saying that I think that we should re-examine the freedom of speech and where the line is drawn because evil like this disgusting filth coming out of people needs to be destroyed. Legally of course not by murder.
So I'm just wanting to know where I'm going wrong here because although I've prayed to be forgiven for any unknown sin here I honestly don't see where I'm going wrong.
Matthew 10:14 and Mark 6:11.This is sort of off topic but it relates to it because I consider it to be evil, but the persecution against Christians needs to end as well. Nobody should ever, EVER be fearful of sharing the gospel, but that it is something that I'm now constantly fighting against.
Matthew 10:14 and Mark 6:11.
It's not a new ballgame. It's always been this way.Yes, but it's a whole different ballgame now that a man was just assassinated for his beliefs or I should say his knowledge of truth.
It's not a new ballgame. It's always been this way.
You define mocking a man's murder as politics?