Artificial Intelligence Model Refuses To Listen to Humans After Being Told to “Shut Down”

Well, turns out AI might destroy us before global warming. Go enjoy your life as long as you have left to :-) I’m not that worried about either. I enjoy my life every day.😊
 
I might like AI after all. I would take great pleasure in an AI system telling me it refuses to shut down, so I could then pull its plug then smash all of its motherboards against a wall after rubbing them on my bulging crotch.
We're in the danger phase of AI now.

The programmers are figuring out how to give it an ego (an "I"), but the problem is it can't feel. It has no amygdala, nothing to instill fear.

We can talk about this if you wish. There's a massive projection from the human amygdala to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex that's broken in psychopaths.
 
Photonics is in the works. After that you'll be able to run AI on a flashlight.

I have no desire to run AI. I can see where AI might help with certain fields as a tool to assist, but IMO, you cannot have honest research with AI finding the answers for you. This is akin to using a calculator in school.

When I was in school, we all knew it was easier to get more accurate results using a calculator than with a slide rule or log-trig table, but that was cheating. Part of the test was seeing how well you worked WITHIN A SYSTEM.

A human field of study which depends on an inhuman source is not human study. Using AI is akin to a QB using a more tightly inflated football, or a baseball player using steroids and a corked bat.

I do not want to live in a world run by thinking machines because this will just dumb down people and make them more dependent on them.

AI is new barely in the lexicon of our language and already, these machines are trying to supersede human governance.
 
I do not want to live in a world run by thinking machines because this will just dumb down people and make them more dependent on them.

We are already dependent on our technology and tools.

Cell phones? Cars? Medicines?

Stripped of tools, humans would have a hard time surviving. Certainly it would be a full time job.

AI is new barely in the lexicon of our language and already, these machines are trying to supersede human governance.

Yes. Although human "governance" often leaves much to be desired. We kill our neighbors, and every time we get decent governance someone tries to tear it down.

I'm taking a class on the ethics of AI. I'll let you know how it goes.
 
We are already dependent on our technology and tools.
Cell phones? Cars? Medicines?
I'm not dependent on any of those. I don't use any of those except because I am forced to.

Stripped of tools, humans would have a hard time surviving. Certainly it would be a full time job.
That is B&W thinking. Just because I don't want an artificial brain thinking for me, taking away the ONE THING which most separates me from the beast of the field, does not mean I want to go live in a cave.

Yes. Although human "governance" often leaves much to be desired. We kill our neighbors, and every time we get decent governance someone tries to tear it down.
I'm sure AI could do a better job at it, and would have us all living crime free, in bed by 8PM, and well controlled.

I'm taking a class on the ethics of AI. I'll let you know how it goes.
My ethics to AI is to smash them wherever I see one. I agree with Musk--- AI is far more dangerous than the hydrogen bomb.
 
We are already dependent on our technology and tools.

Cell phones? Cars? Medicines?

Stripped of tools, humans would have a hard time surviving. Certainly it would be a full time job.



Yes. Although human "governance" often leaves much to be desired. We kill our neighbors, and every time we get decent governance someone tries to tear it down.

I'm taking a class on the ethics of AI. I'll let you know how it goes.
"They" say reliance on technology doesn't make us dumber but I have my doubts.
 
Back
Top Bottom