Arrests Happening for Church Rioters

That'll fail.
Probably.
Disrupting a Church is illegal...
A misdemeanor.
That we know of so far....Much more to come out...
The videos are out there. We've yet to see anything of the sort.
If they were in a public venue, I'd say you'd have an argument, but according to the law, you can't go into a church and get loud and disrupt service...
True, but the details still matter.
Well, my goodness, it's about time you answered that question....Why was that so hard to say?
I don't like being bullied with useless questions.
Why? Because he took a job in law enforcement?
Because he is overseeing a law enforcement agency that is repeatedly abusing people in the community and depriving them of their constitutional rights, though violence and force.
 
Yeah? Well, you can't just do anything you want to do....
If law enforcement says they won't prosecute you for breaking the law, then you can do illegal things.
 
Everyone who participated in that assault on the church should be charged.
 
Considering he was intent on overturning the election by having state legislatures appoint electors for him despite the votes of the people of the state, it looks like he actually never really cared that much about public support.

If trying to steal an election from the voters doesn't lose support, what would?
His margin of victory over Cackles would probably have been significantly bigger had the rioters done what he told everyone to do instead of rioting.
 
If you hate criminals, then why do you love Trump and all his unaccountable thugs who are violating people's rights?

That's right. Because you're the modern day Polemarchus and refuse to listen.
Because they are leaders who closed open borders, lowered regs and taxes, invested in our military, held leftist schools accountable, inflation has stabilized, GDP is growing, law and order is the strategy, men aren’t allowed in women’s sports, enforce policing, grow our military, stand against Radical Islam

He didn’t elect himself. He won the EC AND the popular vote.

You are just butthurt
 
So the next democratic president should pardon all of these individuals and declare through the DoJ that interrupting church services will not be prosecuted federally, but anything in an abortion clinic will be aggressively prosecuted.

Is that the game now?
If that’s what they decide to do, you didn’t seem to have a problem with Biden’s record number of pardons.

The one thing they can’t pardon are the civil suits that could be brought against these protesters, civil rights is a big issue for the left as they scream it all the time.

So you believe people should have a right to disrupt churches and their worship?
 

It's really telling that they're like, unequal application of the law is a clear example of the weaponization of the federal government. And their response is, so we are going to unequally apply the law!
Imagine that, a DOJ swinging the pendulum the other way and allowing state and local governments to do their jobs. As we can see in Minn, they don't want to do that.
 
His margin of victory over Cackles would probably have been significantly bigger had the rioters done what he told everyone to do instead of rioting.
What does it say about his supporters when they vote for the guy who tried to take away the votes of millions of Americans in 2020?
 
It makes you a hypocrite. You're here beating your chest about prosecuting criminals but then turn around and support Trump even though he's a criminal.

If Trump uses the government to beat up peaceful left wing protestors, he won't lose your support. If Trump uses the government to prosecute enemies and protect allies who do the exact same crimes, he won't lose your support. If Trump corruptly pardons people who commit crimes on his behalf against people you hate, he won't lose your support.
Except the protester are not “peaceful” they violated the 1st Amendment rights and the civil rights of all those that were in church worshipping.

I see no difference in the BLM, ANTIFA, Jan 6, and these protests, and if you want to protest peacefully have at it, but violating others rights, not being peaceful? You get what you get.
 
Imagine that, a DOJ swinging the pendulum the other way and allowing state and local governments to do their jobs. As we can see in Minn, they don't want to do that.
States weren't prosecuting invasions into abortion clinics, which is why the federal government got involved in the first place.

So this DoJ is doing exactly what they accused others of doing.
 
Probably.
Glad we agree
A misdemeanor.
If they convict them of violating the Face Act, then It's more than a misdemeanor....Carries prison time...
The videos are out there. We've yet to see anything of the sort.
Videos are edited.
True, but the details still matter.
Follow the trial....
I don't like being bullied with useless questions.
So, just asking you the question is "bullying"?
Because he is overseeing a law enforcement agency that is repeatedly abusing people in the community and depriving them of their constitutional rights, though violence and force.
Enforcing the laws isn't abuse....Immigration is the Federal Government's responsibility, isn't that what you guy's were telling us for years? Like when Obama was deporting millions?
 
Except the protester are not “peaceful” they violated the 1st Amendment rights and the civil rights of all those that were in church worshipping.

I see no difference in the BLM, ANTIFA, Jan 6, and these protests, and if you want to protest peacefully have at it, but violating others rights, not being peaceful? You get what you get.
Words have meaning. You can't say people who were shouting or screaming are being violent.

Violence involves physical acts to injure other or property.
 
Glad we agree
Sure.
If they convict them of violating the Face Act, then It's more than a misdemeanor....Carries prison time...
Nonviolent offenses are misdemeanors. Misdemeanors can carry prison time, up to 6 months if I'm not mistaken.
Videos are edited.
So you're just speculating/making things up.
Follow the trial....

So, just asking you the question is "bullying"?
It can be.
Enforcing the laws isn't abuse....Immigration is the Federal Government's responsibility, isn't that what you guy's were telling us for years? Like when Obama was deporting millions?
They're terrorizing people because they're minorities. They're attacking people who are exercising their constitutional rights. They're lying to us and the courts.

That's not enforcing the law.
 
You don’t have to be violent to be threatening. Kids were shaking and crying and they followed them to their cars. Additional charges are 100% coming. What’s funny is I answered you and you didn’t answer me.
It's a troll. Ignore it.
 
15th post
He's definitely a criminal. You ignore the evidence.

He's definitely abusing the government to go after his enemies. You ignore the evidence.

He's definitely using ICE to attack peaceful protestors. You ignore the evidence.

He's definitely using government to silence speech. You ignore the evidence.

He's definitely protecting criminals who commit crimes on his behalf. You ignore the evidence.

But since he's only abusing the rights of people you hate, none of this matters. You voted for this.
How is this any difference than the left excusing evidence?

Biden clearly violated our free speech, you ignored the evidence.

Biden violated the constitution of those that didn’t vaccinate for religious reasons, you ignored the evidence.

Biden didn’t enforce border restrictions and hurt this country, you ignored the evidence.

Biden messed up the pullout of Afghanistan and cost Americans lives and Afghans who had helped and supported the United States, one gentleman and his family who actually saved Biden’s life, you ignored the evidence the evidence.

Biden lied about inflation being at 9% when he was sworn into office, you ignored the evidence.

Biden has made several racist comments through the years, you ignored the evidence.

Biden claimed he was cognizant, when it was crystal clear he wasn’t, you ignored the evidence.

Biden weaponized the DOJ against his foes you ignored the evidence.

Seems the left and right ignore lots of stuff.
 
Sure.

Nonviolent offenses are misdemeanors. Misdemeanors can carry prison time, up to 6 months if I'm not mistaken.
That’s not what they were giving the 23 you were concerned about?
So you're just speculating/making things up.
No more so than you are… :dunno:
It can be.
Only if you’re trying to be less than honest with your argument…
They're terrorizing people because they're minorities.
They are only “terrorized” because they’re here illegally.
They're attacking people who are exercising their constitutional rights.
Constitutional rights do not mean that you can violate law. They have the right to an administrative hearing, and those removed have had that, and are ordered removed.
They're lying to us and the courts.
About what?
That's not enforcing the law.
Enforcement is what they’re doing.
 
How is this any difference than the left excusing evidence?
Let's see.
Biden clearly violated our free speech, you ignored the evidence.
We disagree on what the facts mean. This did come before SCOTUS and was rejected. Did they ignore the evidence?
Biden violated the constitution of those that didn’t vaccinate for religious reasons, you ignored the evidence.
Religious exemptions were allowed.
Biden didn’t enforce border restrictions and hurt this country, you ignored the evidence.
Fair. The extent to which it "hurt this country", is debatable.
Biden messed up the pullout of Afghanistan and cost Americans lives and Afghans who had helped and supported the United States, one gentleman and his family who actually saved Biden’s life, you ignored the evidence the evidence.
The pullout was messed up. As for the gentleman, saying he "saved Biden's life" is a bit of an exaggeration.
Biden lied about inflation being at 9% when he was sworn into office, you ignored the evidence.
I agree, that's untrue.
Biden has made several racist comments through the years, you ignored the evidence.
Some yes, but other's less so. There was one time where he was quoting someone else critically, and that was taken out of context.
Biden claimed he was cognizant, when it was crystal clear he wasn’t, you ignored the evidence.
We literally pressured him until he dropped out of the race.
Biden weaponized the DOJ against his foes you ignored the evidence.
You don't have evidence. You have an argument from incredulity. I say show me the evidence and your reply can be summarized by "don't be naive, of course he did it".
Seems the left and right ignore lots of stuff.
No one is perfect, but MAGA is completely delusional.
 
Lemon will be perp walked within 72 hours from now (10:00 AM PST Friday )
 
Back
Top Bottom